Promoting equity in the writing classroom through critical self-reflection
A cross-site examination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.24425Keywords:
anti-racism, anti-bias, writing, reflective practice, online learningAbstract
This study presents findings and strategies found to be successful through encouraging reflective thinking about classroom practices related to access, equity, and diversity. We asked, ‘How does classroom practice change when teachers reflect on equitable instruction? Do teachers recognize biased practices in their classroom? How might a teacher’s instruction unknowingly create barriers for students, thus limiting student learning?’ Over the course of one semester, participants worked collaboratively to reflect on equitable classroom practices to affect student voices. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study was conducted through virtual discussions and online platforms. Here, we share reflections that surfaced during the online discussions.
References
Berlin, J. (1988). Rhetoric and ideology in the writing class. College English, 50(5), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.2307/377477
Bloom, L. (1996). Freshman composition as a middle-class enterprise. College English, 58(6), 654–675. https://doi.org/10.2307/378392
De Hertogh, L. (2018). Feminist digital research methodology for rhetoricians of health and medicine. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 43(4), 480–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651918780188
de Müeller, G., & Ruiz, I. (2017). Race, silence, and writing program administration: Study of US college writing programs. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 40(2), 19–39.
Desimone, L. (2011). The primer on effective professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200616
Fecho, B., & Allen, J. (2004). Teacher inquiry into literacy, social justice, and power. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Methods of Research on Teaching the English Language Arts (2nd ed., pp. 211–244). Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
Fox, T. (1990). Basic writing as cultural conflict. The Journal of Education, 172(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205749017200112
Guerra, P., & Nelson, S. (2009). Changing professional practice requires changing beliefs. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(5), 354–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000509
Huot, B. (2002). (RE)Articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning. Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt46nx5z
Inoue, A. (2015). Antiracist writing assessment ecologies: Teaching and assessing writing for a socially just future. The WAC Clearinghouse. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2015.0698
Jaworski, B. (1993). The professional development of teachers – The potential of critical reflection. Journal of In-Service Education, 19(3), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305763930190307
Lieberman, A., & Nelson, S. (2008). Chapter Two: Developing Capacities. In A. Lieberman & Miller, L. (Eds.), Teachers and professional communities: Improving teaching and learning (pp. 18–28). Teachers College Press.
Malarky, T. (2005). Introduction for equity: What does it mean for teacher research? Working toward equity: Writings and resources from the teacher research collaborative (pp. 11–26). National Writing Project.
McCarthey, S., & Mkhize, D. (2013). Teachers’ orientations towards writing. Journal of Writing Research, 5(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.05.01.1
Mentor, M., & Sealey-Ruiz, Y. (2021). Doing the deep work of antiracist pedagogy: Toward self-excavation for equitable classroom teaching. Language Arts, 99(1), 19–24.
Richards, D. (2020). Introduction: The politics, praxis, and performativity of teacher neutrality. In D. Richards (Ed.), On teacher neutrality: Praxis, politics, and performativity (pp. 3–24). Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.7330/9781607329992
Werder, C. (2000). Rhetorical agency: Seeing the ethics of it all. WAP: Writing Program Administration, 24(1–2), 7–26.
Yancey, Kathleen. (1998). Reflection in the writing classroom. Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt46nsh0