Examining the (in)compatibility of formal project report writing and notions of agency and creativity in the written work of chemistry majors at a Singaporean university
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.20356Keywords:
ACADEMIC LITERACIES, CONTINGENCY, AGENCY, REFLEXIVITYAbstract
I set out in this article to address the question of whether it is possible to be creative and agentive when the written content involves information of a factual, statistical, or empirical nature. In examining the matter of creativity and agentivity in such writing, I seek to locate my understanding of both areas in the realm of the situated, subjective, and the reflexive, and the expression of creativity as an enactment and enablement of these three qualitative dimensions through(out) the fluidity and contingency of the composing process and experience. My discussion first provides an account of my own reflexive positioning as a writing teacher. This section is followed by a review of relevant literature in the area of academic literacies and the way knowledge and disciplinarity as they are captured and naturalized in written text may be challenged for their supposed representation of static and depersonalized views of meaning. Thereafter I consider PW308 – a course in scientific project report writing – and feedback from a group of third-year chemistry students with respect to the situatedness of their individual experiences as they went about composing their project report.
References
Beijaard, D. (2019) Teacher learning as identity learning: Models, practices, and topics. Teachers and Teaching 25(1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406022019.1542871
Canagarajah, S. (2006) TESOL at forty: What are the issues? TESOL Quarterly 40(1): 9–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264509
Coffin, C., Curry, M., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T., and Swann, J. (2003) Teaching Academic Writing: A Toolkit for Higher Education. London: Routledge.
Connelly, F. and Clandinin, D. (1999) Knowledge, context, and identity. In F. Connelly and D. Clandinin (eds) Shaping a Professional Identity: Stories of Education Practice, 1–5. New York: Columbia University.
Freire, P. (1998) Teachers as Cultural Workers: Letters to Those Who Dare to Teach. Boulder: Westview.
Jenkins, J. (2014) English as a Lingua Franca in the International University: The Politics of Academic English Language Policy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798157
Kennedy, D. (2020) Academic writing as community of practice: Peer ethnography research in the EFL classroom. In J. Bradley and D. Kennedy (eds) Bringing Forth a World: Engaged Pedagogy in the Japanese University, 48–66. Leiden: Brill.
Lillis, T. (2003) Student writing as academic literacies: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education 17(3): 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666848
Lillis, T., and Turner, J. (2001) Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education 6(1): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510020029608
Minakova, V. and Canagarajah, S. (2020) Monolingual ideologies versus spatial repertoires: Language beliefs and writing practices of an international STEM scholar. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1768210
Nadal-Burgues, N. (2014) Project specification: Creativity and rhetoric in scientific research. Journal of Organizational Change Management 27(5): 807–818. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2014-0176
Prior, P. (1998) Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Scott, M. and Turner, J. (2004) Creativity, conformity and complexity in academic writing: Tensions at the interface. In M. Baynham, A. Deignan, and G. White (eds) Applied Linguistics at the Interface: Selected Papers from the Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, 145–155. London: Equinox.
Shanahan, T. and Shanahan, C. (2012) What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders 32(1): 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
Toh, G. (2016) Graduate school academic writing in a Japanese situation: Drawing on the design perspective towards an affirmation of English as a Lingua Franca. Englishes in Practice 3(2): 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/eip-2016-0002
