‘I do the peer review by myself’

A Chinese international student’s approach to process writing

Authors

  • Magda Tigchelaar University of Toronto Mississauga Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.20355

Keywords:

Chinese international students, Activity Theory, process writing

Abstract

In response to increasing interest in Vygotskian sociocultural theory in second-language learning (Lantolf and Thorne, 2006; Swain, Kinnear, and Steinman, 2015) and the call for understanding language-learning processes in relation to contexts surrounding individuals (e.g., Polio and Williams, 2009; Ferris and Hedgcock, 2014), this study adopts a sociocultural approach – more specifically, an activity theory (Leont’ev, 1981) framework – to explore an undergraduate student’s approach to L2 writing in a preparatory writing course. Using a single case study design (Duff, 2014), I investigated how a student from China learned to write academic papers that met the academic norms in an English as a second language (ESL) writing class in an American university. Specifically, I analyzed how his writing activity aligned with his instructor’s proposed approach to a writing task. Through the analysis of course materials, the participant’s written work, observations, email communications, and interviews, I tracked how his agency (Bhowmik, 2016; Casanave, 2012; Lee, 2008; Saenkhum, 2016) as a writer developed over his first semester in the ESL program. Findings indicate that while the participant did not follow the operations assigned by the instructor, he acted strategically to accomplish selected parts of his writing assignments. His mediated actions were driven by his goals and motives that were understood from within his social and cultural environments, and interacted with each other in a dynamic and constructive manner. Overall, the study underscores the need for flexible approaches to writing instruction and the usefulness of employing activity theory as a framework in studying L2 writing processes.

Author Biography

  • Magda Tigchelaar, University of Toronto Mississauga

    Magda Tigchelaar is assistant professor in the Department of Language Studies at the University of Toronto Mississauga, Canada.

References

Bhowmik, S. K. (2016) Agency, identity and ideology in L2 writing: Insights from the EAP classroom. Writing and Pedagogy 8(2): 275–308. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.26864

Canagarajah, A. S. (2013) Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073889

Casanave, C. (2012) Controversy and change in how we view L2 writing in international contexts. In L. Alsagoff, S. L. McKay, G. Hu and W. A. Renandya (eds) Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language, 282–297.

Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Coughlan, P. and Duff, P. (1994) Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. Lantolf and G. Appel (eds) Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research, 173–193. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Duff, P. A. (2014) Case study research on language learning and use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 34: 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000051

Duff, P. and Anderson, T. (2016) In J. D. Brown and C. Coombs (eds) Cambridge Guide to Language Research. Cambridge University Press.

Emig, J. (1967) On teaching composition: Some hypotheses as definitions. Research in the Teaching of English 1(2): 127–135. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED022783.pdf

Engeström, Y. (1999) Activity theory and individual social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettenen, and R. L. Punamaki (eds) Perspectives on Activity Theory: 1–15. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003

Ferris, D. and Hedgcock, J. (2014) Teaching L2 Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813003

Flower, L. and Hayes, J. R. (1981) A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 32(4): 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Fujioka, M. (2014) L2 student-U.S. professor interactions through disciplinary writing assignments: An activity theory perspective. Journal of Second Language Writing 25: 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.004

Gan, Z. (2009) ‘Asian learners’ re-examined: An empirical study of language learning attitudes, strategies and motivation among mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 30, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630802307890

Green, S. (2013) Novice ESL writers: A longitudinal case-study of the situated academic writing processes of three undergraduates in a TESOL context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12, 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.04.001

Gu, Q. and Schweisfurth, M. (2006) Who adapts? Beyond cultural models of ‘the’ Chinese learner. Language, Culture, and Curriculum 19, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310608668755

Huang, J. and Brown, K. (2009) Cultural factors affecting Chinese ESL students’ academic learning. Education 129, 643–653.

Horowitz, D. M. (1986) Process, not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly 20, 141–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586397

Hyland, K. (2013) Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 22: 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.003

Institute for International Education (2018) Open Doors. Retrieved 7 May, 2019, from https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Publications/Open-Doors/Data/International-Students/Leading-Places-of-Origin

Juffs, A. and Friedline, B. E. (2014) Sociocultural influences on the use of a web-based tool for learning English vocabulary. System 42: 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.10.015

Lantolf, J. P. (2000) Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, 1–26. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315624747-1

Lantolf, J. P. (2005) Sociocultural and second language learning research: An exegesis. In E. Hinkel (ed.) Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, 335–354. Routledge.

Lantolf, J. P., and Appel, G. (1994) Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. (2006) Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford University Press.

Lee, H. (2008) Learner agency and identity in second language writing. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics 156, 109–128. https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034425

Leont’ev, A. N. (1981) The problem of activity in psychology. In J. Wertsch (ed.) The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, 37–71. Sharpe.

Li, G., Chen. W., and Danmu, J. (2009) Determinants of international students’ academic performance: A comparison between Chinese and other international students. Journal of Studies in International Education 14: 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315309331490

Li, Y. (2013) Three ESL students writing a policy paper assignment: An activity-analytic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(2): 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.006

Li, W. and Zhu, H. (2013) Translanguaging identities and ideologies: Creating transnational space through flexible multilingual practices amongst Chinese university students in the UK. Applied Linguistics 34(5): 516–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt022

Liou, T. (2014) Chinese-speaking international students’ experiences and perspectives of ESL university writing programs. Dissertation Abstracts International 74: 7-A(E).

Mak, and Lee. (2014) Implementing assessment for learning in L2 writing: An activity theory perspective. System 47, 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.018

Myles, J. and Cheng, L. (2003) The social and cultural life of non-native English speaking international graduate students at a Canadian university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(3): 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00028-6

Polio, C. and Williams, J. (2009) Teaching and testing writing. In M. Long and C. Doughty (eds) The Handbook of Language Teaching, 486–517. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch26

Ranta, L. and Meckelborg, A. (2013) How much exposure to English do international graduate students really get? Measuring language use in a naturalistic setting. Canadian Modern Language Review 69, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.987

Roebuck, R. (2000) Subjects speak out: How learners position themselves in a psycholinguistic task. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, 81–98. Oxford University Press.

Saenkhum, T. (2016) Decisions, Agency, and Advising: Key Issues in the Placement of Multilingual Writers into First-Year Composition Courses. Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.7330/9781607325482

Sharma, B. K. (2015) Interactional concerns in implementing group tasks: Addressing silence, dominance, and off-task talk in an academic writing class. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 9(3): 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.914522

Sharp, L. A. (2016) Acts of writing: A compilation of six models that define the processes of writing. International Journal of Instruction 9(2): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.926a

Swain, M., Kinnear, P., and Steinman, L. (2015) Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Education: An Introduction through Narratives (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093182

Tardy, C. (2009) Building Genre Knowledge. Parlor Press.

Terraschke, A., and Wahid, R. (2011) The impact of EAP study on the academic experiences of international postgraduate students in Australia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10(3): 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.003

Williams, J. D. (2003) Preparing to Teach Writing: Research, Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607461

Yang, L. (2014) Examining the mediational means in collaborative writing: Case studies of undergraduate ESL students in business courses. Journal of Second Language Writing 23: 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.01.003

Yu, S. and Lee, I. (2015) Understanding EFL students’ participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory perspective. Language Teaching Research 19(5): 572–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541714

Yu, S. and Lee, I. (2016) Exploring Chinese students’ strategy use in a cooperative peer feedback writing group. System 58: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.02.005

Zamel, V. (1983) The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly 17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586647

Zhu, W. and Mitchell, D. A. (2012) Participation in peer response as activity: An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective. TESOL Quarterly 46(2): 362–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.22

Published

2021-08-15

Issue

Section

Research Matters

How to Cite

Tigchelaar, M. . (2021). ‘I do the peer review by myself’: A Chinese international student’s approach to process writing. Writing and Pedagogy, 12(2-3), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.20355