Engaging in a University Curriculum Involving Sustainability Themes

A Two-Year Case Study of a First-year Writing Course

  • Tara Hembrough Southeastern Oklahoma State University
Keywords: FIRST-YEAR COMPOSITION, WRITING PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION, ASSESSMENT, ECOCOMPOSITION, ENVIRONMENTALLY THEMED COMPOSITION, PLACE-BASED COMPOSITION, SUSTAINABILITY, INTERDISCIPLINARY COURSEWORK, PROGRAM DESIGN, RETENTION

Abstract

Writing about environmental and sustainability issues has grown in popularity, especially in lower-division writing courses. Yet, for teachers and writing program administrators, what are the benefits and drawbacks in asking students to interact with place-based discourses? How does implementing an ecocomposition curriculum and sustainability topics in first-year composition affect students’ writing outcomes? This article discusses a two-year, case study at a comprehensive research university of an experimental course-design model involving 1,421 students and 63 teachers. Students engaged with the university’s sustainability theme in Composition I, as well as other courses. This article includes a description of Composition I’s framework and its assessment practices, and raters measure the writing outcomes for the class’s major essay, a literature review. Overall, teachers utilizing ecocomposition practices presented students with a cohesive, relevant curriculum and assisted them in developing and organizing the literature review; writing and thinking about diverse spaces related to their experiences, majors, and futures; and forging and documenting campus and local ties, including through community-based learning. The study’s results have implications for teaching ecocomposition and sustainability themes in first-year composition.

Author Biography

Tara Hembrough, Southeastern Oklahoma State University

Dr. Tara Hembrough is an Assistant Professor at Southeastern Oklahoma State University. She teaches in the English Department and serves as the Area Head for Professional and Technical Writing. Her forthcoming publications concern student veterans and writing program administration.

References

Adler-Kassner, L. (2012). The companies we keep or the companies we would like to try to keep: Strategies and tactics in challenging times. WPA 36 (1), 119-140.

Aitchison, D. (2015). Decline and renewal in the liberal arts as themes for first-year writing. Journal of General Education, 64 (3), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.5325/jgeneeduc.64.3.0157 https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2015.0020

Alaimo, S. (2010). Sustainable this, sustainable that: New materialisms, post-humanism, and unknown futures. PMLA, 127 (3), 558-564. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2012.127.3.558

Berlin, J. (1996). Rhetorics, Poetics, and Cultures: Refiguring College English Studies. Urbana, IL: NCTE.

Beaufort, A. (2012). College writing and beyond: Five years later. Composition Forum, 26. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ985817.pdf.

Bovill, C.; Bulley, C., and Morss, K. (2011). Engaging and empowering first-year students through curriculum design. Teaching in Higher Education, 16 (2), 197-209. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/43904/. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.515024

Brown, S. (1999). Composing the eco wars: Toward a literacy of resistance. JAC, 19 (2), 215-239. http://www.jaconlinejournal.com/archives/vol19.2/brown-composing.pdf.

Cooper, M. (1986). The ecology of writing. College English, 48, 364-375.
http://links.jstor.org/ sici?sici=00100994%28198604%2948%3A4%3C364%3ATEOW%3E2.0.CO%3B2-F.

Corbo, A. (2010). 'Still deciding': Working with learning communities. Business Communication Quarterly, 73 (20), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569910367602

Cresswell, J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Davis, R. (2013). A place for ecopedagogy in community literacy. Community Literacy Journal, 7 (2), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1353/clj.2013.0001

Dewey, J. (1915). Democracy and Education. New York: Free Press.

Dobrin, S. and Weisser, C. (2002a). Breaking ground in ecocomposition: Exploring relationships between discourse and environment. College English, 64 (5), 566-589.

Dobrin, S. and Weisser, C. (2002b). Natural Discourse: Toward Ecocomposition. Albany, NY: SUNY P. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250754

Fitts, K. (2005). Ideology, life practices, and pop culture: So why is this called writing class? Journal of General Education, 54 (2), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2005.0018

Friedman, S. (2013). This way for vampires: Teaching first-year composition in 'challenging times.' Teaching and Learning, 6 (1), 77-84.

Gaard, G. (2001). Ecofeminism and ecocomposition: Pedagogies, perspectives, and intersections. In C. Weisser and S. Dobrin (Eds), Ecomposition: Theoretical and Pedagogical Approaches, 163-178. Albany, NY: SUNY P.

Garrett, N., Bridgewater, M., and Feinstein, B. (2017). How student performance in first-year composition predicts retention and overall student success. In T. Ruecker (Ed.), Retention, Persistence, and Writing Programs, 93-113. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.7330/9781607326021.c006

Gates, J. and Mirkin, C. (2012). Encouraging STEM students is in the national interest. Chronicle for Higher Education. http://www.chronicle.com/article/Encouraging-STEM-Students-Is/132425.

Goggin, P. and Waggoner, Z. (2005). Sustainable development: Thinking globally and acting locally in the writing classroom. Composition Studies, 33 (2), 45-67. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43501623.

Graff, G. and Hoberek, A. (1999). Hiding It from the kids (with apologies to Simon and Garfunkel). College English 62 (2), 242-254. https://doi.org/10.2307/379020

Heiman, J. (2014). Odd topics and open minds: Implementing critical thinking in interdisciplinary, thematic writing courses. Pedagogy, 14 (1), 107-135. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-2348929

Hothem, T. (2009). Suburban studies and college writing: Applying ecocomposition. Pedagogy, 9 (1), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-2008-016

House, V. (2016). Keeping writing weird: A call for eco-administration and engaged writing programs. Community Literacy Journal, 11 (1), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1353/clj.2016.0014

Johnson-Sheehan, R. (2007). Composing nature. The Writing Instructor. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ824638.pdf.

Killingsworth, J. (2005). From Environmental Rhetoric to Ecocomposition and Ecopoetics: Finding a place for professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14 (4), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1404_1

Lindholdt, P. (2001). Restoring bioregions through applied composition. In C. Weisser and S. Dobrin (Eds), Ecocomposition: Theoretical and Pedagogical Approaches, 235-252. Albany, NY: SUNY P.

Long, M. (2001). Education and environmental literacy: Reflections on teaching ecocomposition in Keene State College's environmental house. In C. Weisser and S. Dobrin (Eds), Ecocomposition: Theoretical and pedagogical approaches, 131-145. Albany, NY: SUNY P.

Lotto, E. (2001). Written in its own season: Nature as ground in the postmodern world. In C. Weisser and S. Dobrin (Eds), Ecocomposition: Theoretical and Pedagogical Approaches, 253-264. Albany, NY: SUNY P.

Maloney, W. (2003). Connecting the texts of their lives to academic literacy: Creating success for at-risk first-year college students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46 (8), 664-673. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40017171.

Marx, S. (2008). 'Think global, write local: Sustainability and English composition.' Paper presented at UC/CSU/CCC Sustainability Conference, August 3. Cal. Poly. San Luis Obispo, CA. http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/susconf/98.

McFarlane, D. and Ogazon, A. (2011). The challenges of sustainability education. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3 (3), 81-107.

McKnight, M. (2001). Reviewed work: Ecocomposition: Theoretical and pedagogical approaches by Christian R. Weisser and Sidney I. Dobrin. JAC, 21 (4), 927-933.
http://www.jaconlinejournal.com/archives/vol21.4/mcknight-ecocomposition.pdf.

Merriam, S. (1985). The case study in educational research: A review of selected literature. Journal of Educational Thought, 19 (3), 204-217. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23768608.

Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Merrill-Ingram, A. (2001). Service learning and ecocomposition: Developing sustainable practices through inter- and extradisciplinarity. In C. Weisser and S. Dobrin (Eds), Ecocomposition: Theoretical and Pedagogical Approaches, 209-233. Albany, NY: SUNY P.

Moekle, K. (2010). Rhetoric, environmental pragmatism, and the ecology of writing. Transformations, 21 (1), 112-122. http://www.academia.edu/3651999/transFORMATIONS_The_Journal_of_Inclusive_Scholarship_and_Pedagogy_Issue_21.1_TEACHING_EARTH.

Monsma, B. (2001). Writing home: Composition, campus ecology, and webbed environments. In C. Weisser and S. Dobrin (Eds), Ecocomposition: Theoretical and Pedagogical Approaches, 281-290. Albany, NY: SUNY P.

Nowacek, R. (2011). Agents of Integration: Understanding Transfer as a Rhetorical Act. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Orr, D. (1990). The liberal arts, the campus, and the biosphere. Harvard Educational Review, 60 (2), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.60.2.41178578550r631u

Orr, D. (1991). What is education for? Six myths about the foundations of modern education and six new principles to replace them. The Learning Revolution, 52. http://www.eeob.iastate.edu/classes/EEOB590A/marshcourse/V.5/V.5a%20What%20Is%20Education%20For.htm.

Owens, D. (2001). Composition and Sustainability: Teaching for a Threatened Generation. Urbana, IL: NCTE.

Rinto, E. and Cogbill-Seiders, E. (2015). Library instruction and themed composition courses: An investigation of factors that impact student learning. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41 (1), 14-20. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/lib_articles/475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.11.010

Ritter, N. (1999). Teaching Interdisciplinary Thematic Units in Language Arts. (Rep. No. 142). Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English and Communication.

Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based Education. Great Barrington, MA: Orion Press.

Sommers, N. and Saltz, L. (2004). The novice as expert: Writing the freshmen year. College Composition and Communication, 56 (1), 124-149. https://doi.org/10.2307/4140684

Sponeberg, A. (2012). Course theme and ideology in the freshman writing classroom. Pedagogy, 12 (3), 544-549. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1625298

Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Szostak, R. (2003). 'Comprehensive' curricular reform: Providing students with a map of the scholarly enterprise. Journal of General Education, 52 (1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2003.0022

Sumner, D. (2001). Don't forget to argue: Problems, possibilities, and ecocomposition. In C. Weisser and S. Dobrin (Eds), Ecomposition: Theoretical and Pedagogical Approaches, 265-280. Albany, NY: SUNY P.

[University name omitted]. (2014). Factbook: 2012-2013.

Tizon, C. (2016). Snapshot Report - Persistence and Retention. National Student Clearinghouse, https://nscresearchcenter.org/snapshotreport-persistenceretention22/.

Walker, P. (2010). (Un)earthing a vocabulary of values: A discourse analysis for ecocomposition. Composition Studies, 38 (1), 69-87. http://www.uc.edu/content/dam/ uc/journals/composition-studies/docs/backissues/38-1/38.1%20Walker.pdf.

Weisser, C. and Dobrin, S. (2001). Breaking new ground in ecocomposition: An introduction. In C. Weisser and S. Dobrin (Eds), Ecocomposition: Theoretical and Pedagogical Approaches, 1-10. Albany, NY: SUNY P.

Yin, R. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Weed, A. (2003). Critical transcendence in composition and literature. Journal of General Education, 52 (1), 14-19.

Zerbe, M. (2007). Composition and the Rhetoric of Science: Engaging the Dominant Discourse. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Published
2019-11-27
How to Cite
Hembrough, T. (2019). Engaging in a University Curriculum Involving Sustainability Themes. Writing & Pedagogy, 11(2), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.34315
Section
Research Matters