A Necessary Debate

The Quality and Role of Artifact Data from Archaeological Field Survey

Authors

  • Nathan Meyer The British School at Athens

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jma.27149

Keywords:

discussion and debate, artifact data, field survey

Abstract

The rigor and vitality of a discipline, indeed the ability to make socially meaningful contributions, is founded not solely on the accumulation of observational data but also on principled and reasoned debate concerning theory and method. For that reason, I wish to thank the editorial team at JMA for inviting me to respond to the paper by de Haas, Leppard, Waagen and Wilkinson. To the degree that the authors have missed or misconstrued several of my arguments is no doubt due in part to my own failings in presenting them. Significantly, however, it is also the result of differing intellectual commitments. I address this key, latter point first, and then respond to some of what I consider more minor points.

References

Bevan, A., J. Conolly, S. Colledge, C. Frederick, C. Palmer, R. Siddall and A. Stellatou 2013 The long-term ecology of agricultural terraces and enclosed fields from Antikythera, Greece. Human Ecology 41: 255-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9552-x

Caraher, W.R., R.S. Moore and D.K. Pettegrew 2014 Pyla-Koutsopetria I. Archaeological Survey of an Ancient Coastal Town. American Schools of Oriental Research, Archaeological Reports 21. Boston: American Schools of Oriental Research. https://doi.org/10.5615/j.ctvj7wksw

Given, M., and A.B. Knapp 2003 The Sydney Cyprus Survey Project: Social Approaches to Regional Archaeological Survey. Monumenta Archaeologica 21. Los Angeles: UCLA Institute of Archaeology.

Gregory, T.E. 2004 Less is better: the quality of ceramic evidence from archaeological survey and practical proposals for low-impact survey in a Mediterranean context. In E.-F. Athanassopoulos and L. Wandsnider (eds.), Mediterranean Archaeological Landscapes: Current Issues, 15-36. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.9783/9781934536285.15

Meyer, N. 2022 Finding sites in Mediterranean survey. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 35: 143-68. https://doi.org/10.1558/jma.25520

Meyer, N., T.E. Gregory and R. Schon 2003 Pottery collection, pottery analysis, and GIS mapping. In M. Given and A.B. Knapp, The Sydney Cyprus Survey Project: Social Approaches to Regional Archaeological Survey. Monumenta Archaeologica 21: 48-52. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.

Strupler, N. 2021 Re-discovering archaeological discoveries. Experiments with reproducing archaeological survey analysis. Internet Archaeology 56. Online. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.56.6

Tartaron, T.F., T.E. Gregory, D.J. Pullen … W.R. Caraher and D.K. Pettegrew 2006 The Eastern Korinthia Archaeological Survey: integrated methods for a dynamic landscape. Hesperia 75: 453–523. https://doi.org/10.2972/hesp.75.4.453

Wilkinson, M., M. Dumontier, I. Aalbersberg … J. Zhao and B. Mons 2016 The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3: 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Downloads

Published

2023-10-26

Issue

Section

Discussion and Debate

How to Cite

Meyer, N. (2023). A Necessary Debate: The Quality and Role of Artifact Data from Archaeological Field Survey. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 36(1), 138-142. https://doi.org/10.1558/jma.27149