Myopic Misunderstandings?

A Reply to Meyer (JMA 35(2), 2022)

Authors

  • Tymon de Haas University of Groningen
  • Thomas P. Leppard Florida State University
  • Jitte Waagen Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Toby Wilkinson University of Cambridge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jma.27148

Keywords:

discussion and debate, survey practices, off-site data

Abstract

This paper engages with Nathan Meyer’s (2022) paper ‘Finding Sites in Mediterranean Survey’. Building upon longstanding critiques of Mediterranean survey practices, Meyer argues for a re-direction of survey practices. We feel that several of his core arguments reflect an unbalanced view on the role of site and off-site data in Mediterranean surveys, conflating intensive and siteless surveys. Moreover, while these critiques seem to us unnecessarily negative regarding the analytical potential of off-site data, they also reflect an overconfident attitude towards the use of site data for comparative purposes.

References

Alcock, S., and J. Cherry 2004 Introduction. In S. Alcock and J. Cherry (eds.), Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World, 1-9. Oxford: Oxbow.

Alcock, S.E., J.F. Cherry and J.L. Davis 1994 Intensive survey, agricultural practice, and the classical landscape of Greece. In I. Morris (ed.), Classical Greece: Ancient Histories and Modern Archaeologies, 137-70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Attema, P., J. Bintliff, M. van Leusen … F. Vermeulen and A. Vionis 2020 A guide to good practice in Mediterranean surface survey projects. Journal of Greek Archaeology 5: 1-62. https://doi.org/10.32028/9781789697926-2

Attema, P., P. Carafa, W. Jongman … R. Witcher and N. Wouda 2022 The Roman Hinterland Project: integrating archaeological field surveys around Rome and beyond. European Journal of Archaeology 25: 238-58. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2021.51

Banning, E.B. 2021 Sampled to death? The rise and fall of probability sampling in archaeology. American Antiquity 86: 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2020.39

Banning, E.B., A.L. Hawkins, S.T. Stewart, P. Hitchings and S. Edwards 2017 Quality assurance in archaeological survey. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 24: 466-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9274-2

Barker, G., and D. Mattingly 1999 General editors’ introduction: the POPULUS project. In J. Bintliff and K. Sbonias (eds.), Reconstructing Past Population Trends in Mediterranean Europe, iii-ix. Oxford: Oxbow.

Bevan, A., and J. Conolly 2009 Modelling spatial heterogeneity and nonstationarity in artifact-rich landscapes. Journal of Archaeological Science 36: 956-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2008.11.023

Bevan, A., and A. Wilson 2013 Models of settlement hierarchy based on partial evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science 40: 2415-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.12.025

Bintliff, J., P. Howard and A. Snodgrass (eds.) 2007 Testing the Hinterland: The Work of the Boeotia Survey (1989-1991) in the Southern Approaches to the City of Thespiae. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

Bintliff, J., and A. Snodgrass 1988 Off-site pottery distributions: a regional and interregional perspective. Current Anthropology 29: 506-13. https://doi.org/10.1086/203668

Blanton, R. 2001 Mediterranean myopia. Antiquity 75(289): 627-29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00035­98X00088918

Blanton, R. 2004 Settlement pattern and population change in Mesoamerican and Mediterranean civilizations: a comparative perspective. In S. Alcock and J. Cherry (eds.), Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World, 206-32. Oxford: Oxbow.

Bowes, K. (ed.) 2021 The Roman Peasant Project 2009-2014: Excavating the Roman Rural Poor. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9781949057089

Casarotto, A., T.D. Stek, J. Pelgrom, R.H. van Otterloo and J. Sevink 2018 Assessing visibility and geomorphological biases in regional field surveys: the case of Roman Aesernia. Geoarchaeology 33: 177-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21627

Cherry, J.F. 1983 Frogs round the pond: perspectives in current archaeological survey projects in the Mediterranean region. In D. Keller and D. Rupp (eds.), Archaeological Survey in the Mediterranean Area. British Archaeological Reports, International Series 155: 375-416. Oxford: Archaeopress.

Crema, E.R. 2022 Statistical inference of prehistoric demography from frequency distributions of radiocarbon dates: a review and a guide for the perplexed. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 29: 1387-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-022-09559-5

de Haas, T. 2012 Beyond dots on the map: intensive survey data and the interpretation of small sites and off-site distributions. In P. Attema and G. Schoerner (eds.), Comparative Issues in the Archaeology of the Roman Rural Landscape: Site Classification between Survey, Excavation and Historical Categories. Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 88: 55-79. Portsmouth, Rhode Island: Journal of Roman Archaeology.

de Haas, T., and M. van Leusen 2020 FAIR survey: improving documentation and archiving practices in archaeological field survey through CIDOC CRM. Fasti On Line Documents and Research 12. Online: http://www.fastionline.org/docs/FOLDER-sur-2020-12.pdf.

de Haas, T., and M. van Leusen 2023 Digital data integration in Mediterranean field survey archaeology: status quo and future perspectives. In T. Kalayci and K. Lambers (eds.), Digital Archaeology: Promises and Impasses. Leiden: Sidestone Press.

Drennan, R.D. 2009 Statistics for Archaeologists: A Common Sense Approach (2nd edn). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0413-3

Fentress, E. 2000 What are we counting for? In R. Francovich and H. Patterson (eds.), Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages, 44-52. Oxford: Oxbow.

Forbes, H. 2013 Off-site scatters and the manuring hypothesis in Greek survey archaeology: an ethnographic approach. Hesperia 82: 551-94. https://doi.org/10.2972/hesperia.82.4.0551

Given, M. 2004 Mapping and manuring: can we compare sherd density figures? In S. Alcock and J. Cherry (eds.), Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World, 13-21. Oxford: Oxbow.

Hayes, P. 1991 Models for the distribution of pottery around former agricultural settlements. In A. Schofield (ed.), Interpreting Artefact Scatters: Contributions to Ploughzone Archaeology. Oxbow Monograph 4: 81-92. Oxford: Oxbow.

Heinzelmann, M., and D. Jordan 2012 Amiternum and the upper Aterno-valley: approaching a Sabine-Roman town and its territory. In F. Vermeulen, G.-J. Burgers, S. Keay and C. Corsi (eds.), Urban Landscape Survey in Italy and the Mediterranean, 23-33. Oxford: Oxbow. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1dk2b.7

Knodell, A.R., T.C. Wilkinson, T.P. Leppard and H.A. Orengo 2023 Survey archaeology in the Mediterranean world: regional traditions and contributions to long-term history. Journal of Archaeological Research 31: 263-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-022-09175-7

Kowalewski, S. 2008 Regional settlement pattern studies. Journal of Archaeological Research 16: 225-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-008-9020-8

Lloyd, J., and G. Barker 1981 Rural settlement in Roman Molise: problems of archaeological survey. In G. Barker and R. Hodges (eds.), Archaeology and Italian Society. British Archaeological Reports, International Series 102: 289–304. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.

Mattingly, D. 2000 Methods of collection, recording and quantification. In R. Francovich and H. Patterson (eds.), Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages, 5-15. Oxford: Oxbow.

Meyer, N. 2022 Finding sites in Mediterranean survey. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 35: 143-68. https://doi.org/10.1558/jma.25520

Pettegrew, D. K. 2001 Chasing the classical farmstead: assessing the formation and signature of rural settlement in Greek landscape archaeology. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 14: 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1558/jmea.v14i2.189

Stek, T.D., and J. Waagen 2022 Scratching the surface: integrating low-visibility zones and large rural sites in landscape archaeology using point sampling. Journal of Field Archaeology 47: 228-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2022.2031466

Strupler, N. 2021 Re-discovering archaeological discoveries. Experiments with reproducing archaeological survey analysis. Internet Archaeology 56. Online. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.56.6

Waagen, J. 2014 Evaluating background noise: detailed assessment of an intensive field survey surface record. Journal of Field Archaeology 39: 417-29. https://doi.org/10.1179/0093469014Z.00000000099

Whitelaw, T. 2012 The urbanisation of prehistoric Crete: settlement perspectives on Minoan state formation. In I. Schoep, T. Tomkins and J. Driessen (eds.), Back to the Beginning: Reassessing Social and Political Complexity on Crete during the Early and Middle Bronze Age, 114-76. Oxford: Oxbow. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1dphz.10

Wilkinson, M.D., M. Dumontier, I. Aalbersberg … J. Zhao and B. Mons 2016 The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3: 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Witcher, R. 2006 Broken pots and meaningless dots? Surveying the rural landscapes of Roman Italy. Papers of the British School at Rome 74: 39-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068246200003226

Witcher, R. 2012 ‘That from a long way off look like farms’: the classification of Roman rural sites. In P. Attema and G. Schoerner (eds.), Comparative Issues in the Archaeology of the Roman Rural Landscape: Site Classification between Survey, Excavation and Historical Categories. Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 88: 11-30. Portsmouth, Rhode Island: Journal of Roman Archaeology.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-26

Issue

Section

Discussion and Debate

How to Cite

de Haas, T., Leppard, T. P., Waagen, J., & Wilkinson, T. (2023). Myopic Misunderstandings? A Reply to Meyer (JMA 35(2), 2022). Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 36(1), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1558/jma.27148