Towards a critical stylistics of disability

Authors

  • Rod Hermeston Sheffield Hallam University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.34022

Keywords:

disability, language, stylistics, description, transitivity, evaluation

Abstract

This article sets out the initial terrain for a critical stylistics of disability exposing the linguistic structures that encode often harmful ideologies surrounding disabled people. Disabled people are represented in literature and the media in general as ‘other’, and as curiosities to be described and explained. They are represented stereotypically as pitiable, evil, burdensome, as ‘Super Cripples’ or super humans, or as self-pitying. Such depictions can be internalised by and harmful to disabled people. Analysis will need to acknowledge that disabled people are frequently foregrounded as socially deviant in representations. Areas for analysis will include the author status as disabled or non-disabled, narrative mode, and the use of disability as metaphor. However, major areas for study will be description in noun phrases, transitivity analysis and the language of appraisal and evaluation. These can be scrutinised to expose the manner in which ideologies and stereotypes of disability are encoded.

Author Biography

  • Rod Hermeston, Sheffield Hallam University

    Rod Hermeston is a disabled linguist. He has previously specialised in the topic of language and identity in nineteenth-century Tyneside dialect songs. However, he also had experience as a disability journalist for seven years and this article marks a return to the topic of disability for him. He is an Associate Lecturer in English Language at Sheffield Hallam University.

References

Barnes, C. (1992) Disabling Imagery and the Media. Halifax: The BCODP and Ryburn Publishing. Retrieved on 13 February 2017 from http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/Barnes-disabling-imagery.pdf.

Bolt, D. (2014) The Metanarrative of Blindness. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Burton, D. (1982) Through glass darkly. In R. Carter (ed.) Language and Literature 195–214. London: George Allan.

Cameron, C. (2011) Whose problem? In G. Craig, M. Mayo, K. Popple, M. Shaw and M. Taylor (eds) The Community Development Reader. Bristol: Policy Press.

Campbell, F. K. (2009) Contours of Ableism. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245181

Clarke, J. (2004) Mad, bad and dangerous: the media and mental illness. Mental Health Practice 7(10): 16–19. Retrieved on 7 June 2017 from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.lcproxy.shu.ac.uk/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=b4132f1a-21b8-4ded-94d1-b0a679af4a85%40sessionmgr104&vid=1&hid=128. https://doi.org/10.7748/mhp2004.07.7.10.16.c1815

Corker, M. and French, S. (eds) (1999a) Disability Discourse. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Corker, M. and French, S. (1999b) Reclaiming discourse in disability studies. In M. Corker and S. French (eds) Disability Discourse 1–11. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Davis, L. J. (2013) Introduction. In L. J. Davis (ed.) The Disability Studies Reader (4th edn) 1–14. New York and London: Routledge.

Fowler, R. (1977) Linguistics and the Novel. London: Methuen.

Fowler, R. (1996) Linguistic Criticism (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Garland-Thomson, R. (1997) Extraordinary Bodies. New York: Columbia University Press.

Garland-Thomson, R. (2009) Staring. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Goatly, A. (2007) Washing the Brain. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Gosling, J. (2011) Abnormal (Kindle edn). London: Bettany Press.

Gregoriou, C. (2007) Deviance in Contemporary Crime Fiction. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230207219

Gregoriou, C. (2014) The linguistic levels of foregrounding in stylistics. In M. Burke (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics 87–100. London and New York: Routledge.

Grue, J. (2015) Disability and Discourse Analysis. Farnham: Ashgate.

Hall, A. (2016) Literature and Disability. London and New York: Routledge.

Haller, B. A. (2010) Representing Disability in an Ableist World. Louisville: The Advocado Press.

Hoover, D. L. (2016) Mind-style. In V. Sotirova (ed.) The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics 325–40. London and New York: Bloomsbury.

Hughes, B. (2012) Fear, pity and disgust. In N. Watson, A. Roulstone and C. Thomas (eds) Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies 67–77. London and New York: Routledge.

Jeffries, L. (2010) Critical Stylistics. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jeffries, L. (2014) Critical stylistics. In M. Burke (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics 408–20. London: Routledge.

Jeffries, L. (2015) Critical stylistics. In V. Sotirova (ed.) The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics 157–76. London and Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Leech, G. N. and Short, M. H. (1981) Style in Fiction. London and New York: Longman.

Mallett, R. (2009) Choosing ‘stereotypes’. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 9(1): 4–11. Retrieved on 15 February 2017 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.lcproxy.shu.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2009.01111.x/full. https://doi.org/

1111/j.1471-3802.2009.01111.x

Mallet, R. and Runswick-Cole, K. (2014) Approaching Disability. London and New York: Routledge.

Mallett, R. and Slater, J. (2014) Language. In C. Cameron (ed.) Disability Studies 91–4. Los Angeles and London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957701.n29

Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910

Mills, S. (2004) Discourse (2nd edn). London: New York.

Mills, S. (2005) Feminist Stylistics. London and New York: Routledge.

Mitchell D. T. and Snyder, S. L. (2000) Narrative Prosthesis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Murray, S. (2014) From Virginia’s sister to Friday’s silence. In A. M. Sánchez-Arce (ed.) Identity and Form in Contemporary Literature 246–61. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

Reeve, D. (2012) Psycho-emotional disablism. In N. Watson, A Roulstone and C. Thomas (eds) Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies 78–92. London and New York: Routledge.

Rieser, R. and Mason, M. (1990) Disability Equality in the Classroom. London: Inner London Education Authority.

Semino, E. (2014) Pragmatic failure, mind style and characterisation in fiction about autism. Language and Literature 23(2): 141–58. Retrieved on 24 April 2017 from http://journals.sagepub.com.lcproxy.shu.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1177/0963947014526312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947014526312

Semino, E. and Swindlehurst, K. (1996) Metaphor and mind style in Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Style 30(1): 143–66. Retrieved on 26 April 2017 from http://search.proquest.com.lcproxy.shu.ac.uk/docview/231175307/fulltextPDF/21B69714D9C8433CPQ/1?accountid=13827

Shakespeare, T. (2014) Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited (2nd edn). London and New York: Routledge.

Siebers, T. (2008) Disability Theory. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.309723

Simpson, P. (1993) Language, Ideology and Point of View. London and New York: Routledge.

Simpson, P. (2004) Stylistics (Kindle edn). London and New York: Taylor & Francis.

Thomas, C. (2007) Sociologies of Disability and Illness. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Thompson, G. (2014) Introducing Functional Grammar (3rd edn). Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

Toolan, M. (1998) Language in Literature. London and New York: Arnold.

Van Leeuwen, T. (1996) The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds) Texts and Practices 32–70. London and New York: Routledge.

Published

2017-09-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hermeston, R. (2017). Towards a critical stylistics of disability. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 1(1), 34-60. https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.34022