Unveiling the rationale of soft hate speech in multimodal artefacts
a critical framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.22363Keywords:
Silvia Romano, multimodal critical discourse studies (MCDS), multimodal argumentation, (soft) hate speechAbstract
This article sets out to outline a methodological framework that enables us to unravel the underlying reasoning of covert hatred (i.e. soft hate speech), through an examination of the ways in which this is realised and, moreover, argumentatively justified in multimodal artefacts of the mainstream press. It focuses on a controversial case study – the release of the Italian hostage Silvia Romano – and how it was covered on the front pages of two right-wing Italian newspapers. It draws on the premises of multimodal critical discourse studies (MCDS), proposing a micro-level cross-fertilisation of a social semiotic discourse–analytical perspective for the analysis of multimodal meaning(s), realised on newspaper front pages, with the Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT), which focuses on the analysis of argumentative inferences that stem from multimodal representational meaning(s).
References
Alkiviadou, N. (2017) Regulating hate speech in the EU. In S. Assimakopoulos, Baider, F. H. and Millar, S. (eds) Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective 6–10. Cham: Springer.
Amossy, R. (2005) The argumentative dimension of discourse. In van Eemeren, F. H. and Houtlosser, P. (eds) Practices of Argumentation 87–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.2.08amo
Amossy, R. (2009a) The New Rhetoric’s inheritance. Argumentation and discourse analysis. Argumentation 23(3): 313–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-009-9154-y
Amossy, R. (2009b) Argumentation in discourse: A socio-discursive approach to arguments. Informal Logic 29(3): 252–67. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v29i3.2843
Assimakopoulos, S. (2020) Incitement to discriminatory hatred, illocution and perlocution. Pragmatics and Society 11(2): 177–95. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18071.ass
Assimakopoulos, S., Baider, F. H. and Millar, S. (eds) (2017) Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A discourse-Analytic Perspective. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5
Assimakopoulos, S. and Serafis, D. (2020) [Hate rhetoric and hate speech: Homophobic tendencies in online news portal comments]. In Boukala, S. and Stamou, A. (eds), [Critical Discourse Analysis: (De)constructing Greek Reality], 589–621. Athens: Nissos.
Baider, F. H., Assimakopoulos, S. and Millar, S. (2017) Hate speech in the EU and the C.O.N.T.A.C.T. project. In Assimakopoulos, S., Baider, F. H. and Millar, S. (eds) Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective 1–6. Cham: Springer.
Baider, F. H., Millar, S. and Assimakopoulos, S. (2020) Hate speech: Definitions, interpretations and practices. Pragmatics and Society 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.11.2
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C. and McEnery, T. (2013) Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Balirano, G. and Hughes, B. (eds) (2020) Homing in on HATE: Critical Discourse Studies of Hate Speech, Discrimination and Inequality in the Digital Age. Napoli: Paolo Loffredo Editore.
Bednarek, M. and Caple, H. (2012) News discourse. London/New York: Continuum.
Bell, A. (1991) The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
Boukala, S. (2016) Rethinking topos in the discourse historical approach: endoxon seeking and argumentation in Greek media discourses on ‘Islamist terrorism’. Discourse Studies 18(3): 249–68. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461445616634550
Boukala, S. (2019) European Identity and the Representation of Islam in the Mainstream Press: Argumentation and Media Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Breazu, P. and Machin, D. (2018) A critical multimodal analysis of the Romanian press coverage of camp evictions and deportations of the Roma migrants from France. Discourse & Communication 12(4): 339–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318757774
Breazu, P. and Machin, D. (2019) Racism toward the Roma through the affordances of Facebook: Bonding, laughter and spite. Discourse & Society 30(4): 376–94. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0957926519837396
Breazu, P. and Machin, D. (2022) ‘It’s still them’: Concealed racism against Roma in Romanian television news. Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture 28(1): 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2021.1976134
Coelho, Z. P. (2008) Front page layout and reading paths: The influence of age on newspaper reading. Communication Studies 4: 1–15.
Council of the European Union (2008) Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law. Official Journal of the European Union L 328/55. Available at: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:328:0055:0058:en:PDF
ECRI – European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (2017) Annual report on ECRI’s activities covering the period from 1 January to 31 December 2016. ECRI report. Available at: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/ecri/activities/Annual_Reports/Annual%20report%202016.pdf
Ettema, J. (2007) Journalism as reason-giving: Deliberative democracy, institutional accountability, and the news media’s mission. Political Communication 24(2): 143–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701312860
Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd edn). London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) Critical Discourse Analysis. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed) Introduction to Discourse Studies 258–84. London: Sage.
Faloppa, F. (2011) Razzisti a Parole (per Tacer dei Fatti) [Racists in Words (Not to Mention Facts). Rome: Laterza.
Faloppa, F. (2020) #Odio: Manuale di Resistenza alla Violenza delle Parole [#Hate: Manual of Resistance to Verbal Violence]. Milano: UTET.
Faso, G. (2008) Lessico del Razzismo Democratico: Le Parole Che Escludono [The Vocabulary of Democratic Racism: Words That Exclude]. Rome: DeriveApprodi.
Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J. E. (eds) (2018) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Taylor & Francis.
Forchtner, B. and Tominc, A. (2012) Critique and argumentation: On the relation between the Discourse-Historical Approach and Pragma-Dialectics. Journal of Language and Politics 11(1): 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.1.02for
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973) Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1985) Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, Ch. M. I. M. (1999) Construing Experience Through Meaning. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, Ch. M. I. M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn). London: Arnold.
Herman, T. (2018) Éclairages, dimension rhétorique et argumentation à l’épreuve des tweets de Donald Trump. Argumentation et Analyse du Discours 20. https://doi.org/10.4000/aad.2504
Herman, T. and Serafis, D. (2019) Emotions, argumentation and argumentativity: Insights from an analysis of newspapers headlines in the context of the Greek crisis. Informal Logic 39(4): 373–400. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338233701_Emotions_Argumentation_and_Argumentativity_Insights_from_an_Analysis_of_Newspaper_Headlines_in_the_Context_of_the_Greek_Crisis
Ihnen, C. and Richardson, J. E. (2011) On combining Pragma-Dialectics with Critical Discourse Analysis. In Feteris, E. T., Garssen, B. and Snoeck Henkemans, F. (eds) Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren 231–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.163.16ihn
Kim, Y. S. and Chung, D. S. (2017) Anatomy of front pages: Comparison between The New York Times and other U.S. major metropolitan newspapers. International Journal of Communication 11: 949–66.
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2015) The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation 29(2): 115–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9348-4
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2017) The rhetorical and argumentative potentials of press photography. In A. Tseronis and C. Forceville (eds.), Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres 51–80. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14.03kje
Kress, G. (2010) Multimodality: A Social-Semiotic Approach to Contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual design. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1998) Front pages: (The critical) analysis of newspaper layout. In Bell, A. and Garrett, P. (eds) Approaches to Media Discourse 186–219. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold Publishers.
Kopytowska, M. (ed) (2017) Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism Across Space and Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ledin, P. and Machin, D. (2020) Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Bloomsbury.
Leeds, L. (2003) Disentangling perceptions of subtle racist speech: A cultural perspective. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22(2): 145–68. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0261927X03022002001
Machin, D. (2013) What is multimodal critical discourse studies? Critical Discourse Studies 10(4): 347–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813770
Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2012) How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
Maneri, M. and Quassoli, F. (eds.). (2020) Un Attentato ‘Quasi Terroristico’. Macerata 2018, Il Razzismo e la Sfera Pubblica al Tempo dei Social Media [A ‘Quasi-Terrorist’ Attack. Macerata 2018, Racism and the Public Sphere at the Time of Social Media]. Rome: Carocci.
Martínez Lirola, M. (2017) Linguistic and visual strategies for portraying immigrants as people deprived of human rights. Social Semiotics 27(1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1137164
Martínez Lirola, M. (2022) Critical analysis of dehumanizing news photographs on immigrants: Examples of the portrayal of non-citizenship. Discourse & Society 33(4) (online first: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F09579265221088121)
Matsuda, M. J. (1989) Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim’s story. Michigan Law Review 87(8): 2320–81.
O’Halloran, K. L., Pal, G. and Jin, M. H. (2021) Multimodal approach to analysing big social and news media data. Discourse, Context and Media 40: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100467
Palmieri, R. (2014) Corporate Argumentation in Takeover Bids. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.4.3.06bre
Pasternack, S. and Utt, S. H. (1986) Subject perception of newspaper characteristics based on front page design. Newspaper Research Journal 8(1): 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F073953298600800103
Pinto, R. C. (2001) Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Reisigl, M. (2014) Argumentation analysis and the discourse-historical approach: A methodological framework. In Hart, C. and Cap, P. (eds) Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies 67–96. London: Bloomsbury.
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2001) Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2016) The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies 23–61. London: Sage.
Reisner, A. E. (1992) The news conference: How daily newspaper editors construct the front page. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 69(4): 971–86. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F107769909206900416
Richardson, J. E. (2004) (Mis)Representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.9
Rigotti, E. and Greco, S. (2019) Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04568-5
Rigotti, E. and Greco Morasso, S. (2010) Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The procedural and material components. Argumentation 24: 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9190-7
Rocci, A. and Pollaroli, C. (2018) Introduction: Multimodality in argumentation. Semiotica 2018(220): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0150
Serafis, D., Greco, S., Pollaroli, C. and Jermini-Martinez Soria, C. (2020a) Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers. Critical Discourse Studies 17(5): 545–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1701509
Serafis, D., Greco, S., Pollaroli, C. and Jermini-Martinez Soria, C. (2020b) Multimodal Arguments in the Mainstream Press: Illustrating Portrayals of Migration. In Julie Cook (ed.), Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 12. Ontario: University of Windsor. Retrieved 6 June 2022 from https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA12/Wednesday/14/
Serafis, D. and Herman, T. (2018) Media discourse and pathos: sketching a critical and integrationist approach – Greek and French headlines before the Greek referendum of 2015. Social Semiotics 28(2): 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1291139
Serafis, D., Raimondo, C., Assimakopoulos, S., Greco, S. and Rocci, A. (2021) Argumentative dynamics in representations of migrants and refugees: Evidence from the Italian press during the ‘refugee crisis’. Discourse & Communication 15(5): 559-581. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F17504813211017706
Serafis, D. (forthcoming) Authoritarianism on the Front Page: Multimodal Discourse and Argumentation in Times of Multiple Crises in Greece. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins.
Soral, W., Bilewicz, M. and Winiewski, M. (2017) Exposure to hate speech increases prejudice through desentization. Aggressive Behavior 44: 136–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21737
Tseronis, A. (2015) Multimodal argumentation in news magazine covers: A case study of front covers putting Greece on the spot of the European economic crisis. Discourse, Context and Media 7: 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.003
Tseronis, A. and Forceville, C. (eds) (2017) Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14
van Dijk, T. A. (1991) The interdisciplinary study of news as discourse. In Bruehn-Jensen, K. and Jankowski, N. (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Mass Communication Research 108–20. London: Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001) Critical discourse analysis. In Tannen, D. Schiffrin, D. and Hamilton, H. (eds) Handbook of Discourse Analysis 352 –371. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008) Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
van Dijk, T. A. (2015) Critical discourse analysis. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E. and Schiffrin, D. (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd edn) 466–85. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Eemeren, F. H. (2018) Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer.
van Eemeren, F. H. and Garssen, B. (2009). Fallacies of composition and division revisited. Cogency 1(1): 23–42.
van Eemeren, F. H. and Grootendorst, R. (2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, F. H. and Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2017) Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation (2nd edn). New York: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, T. (1993a) Genre and field in critical discourse analysis: A synopsis. Discourse & Society 4(2): 193–223.
van Leeuwen, T. (1993b) Language and representation – the recontextualization of participants, activities and reactions. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Sydney.
van Leeuwen, T. (1996) The representation of social actors. In Caldas-Coulthard, C. and Coulthard, M. (eds) Texts and Practices – Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis 32–70. London: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Leeuwen, T. and Wodak, R. (1999) Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies 1(1): 83–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005
Weber, A. (2009) Manual on Hate Speech. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds) (2016) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd edn). London: Sage.
Zampa, M. (2017) Argumentation in the Newsroom. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
