The significance of activist language policies in public debate – a concern for language planning agencies?

Authors

  • Mats Landqvist Södertörn University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.18282

Keywords:

language policy and planning, metapragmatics, discrimination

Abstract

This article discusses the relationship between official language planning and policies concerning language usage that are increasingly emerging in anti-discriminatory contexts. It is suggested that the social function of lexical meaning needs to be given more attention, i.e. the meaning that arises from a person’s choice of words, especially in public discourse and debate. For this reason, it is further suggested that public debates be analysed with metapragmatic concepts providing useful links between lexical indexes to (ideological) loyalties and social identity or attribution of social identity. The notion of a diverse meaning allocation is contextualised in the principles governing official language planning agencies in Sweden. It is concluded that the prevalence of, for example, plain language principles in official language planning may be balanced with a more complex policy, taking a larger span of potential lexical significance into consideration.

Author Biography

Mats Landqvist, Södertörn University

Mats Landqvist is a professor of Swedish. His research interests are language policy and language and knowledge.

References

Agha, A. (2004) Registers of Language. In A. Duranti (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology 23–45. Oxford: WIley-Blackwell.

Agha, A. (2006) Language and Social Relations, Vol. 24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ahmed, S. (2012) On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham and London: Duke University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822395324-005

Athanasopoulos, P., Bylund, E., Montero-Melis, G., Damjanovic, L., Schartner, A., Kibbe, A., Riches, N. and Thierry, G. (2015) Two languages, two minds: flexible cognitive processing driven by language of operation. Psychological Science 26(4): 518–26. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0956797614567509

Blommaert, J. and Rampton, B. (2011) Language and superdiversity. Diversities 13(2): 1–22.

Butler, J. (1997) Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.

Cassels Johnson, D. and Ricento, T. (2013) Conceptual and theoretical perspectives in language planning and policy: situating the ethnography of language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 219: 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2013-0002

Cooper, R. L. (1989) Language Planning and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cornelius, E. (2015) Defining ‘plain language’ in contemporary South Africa. Stellen bosch Papers in Linguistics 44: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5774/44-0-190

Cosenza, J. (2010) SLOW: Crip theory, dyslexia and the borderlands of disability and ablebodiedness. Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies 6(2): 1–11.

Deumert, A. (2019) Sensational signs, authority and the public sphere: Settler colonial rhetoric in times of change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 23(5): 467–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12377

Duranti, A. (2009) Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader 402–34. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

ElSherief, M., Kulkarni, V., Nguyen, D., Yang Wang, W., and Belding, E. (2018) Hate lingo: A target-based linguistic analysis of hate speech in social media. Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

Familjeliv (2018) Kan ni sluta använda hen!?!? [forum information]. https://www.familjeliv.se/forum/thread/79028265-kan-ni-sluta-anvanda-hen/0/search/modern

Foucault, M. (1982) The subject and power. Critical Inquiry 8(4): 777–95.

Gal, S. (2019) Making registers in politics: Circulation and ideologies of linguistic authority. Journal of Sociolinguistics 23(5): 450–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12374

Haugen, E. (1974) Sociology of Language in Sweden-Thelander Mats. Grepp och begrepp i språksociologin. Lund (Sweden): Studentlitteratur. Ord Och Stil. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500007302

Heyd, T. and Schneider, B. (2019) The sociolinguistics of late modern publics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 23(5): 435–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12378

Hult, F. M. and Hornberger, N. H. (2016) Revisiting orientations in language planning: Problem, right, and resource as an analytical heuristic. The Bilingual Review/La revista bilingüe 33(3): 30.

Irvine, J. T. (2001) Style as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In P. Eckert & J. R. Rickford (eds.) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511613258.002

Irvine, J. T., and Gal, S. (2009) Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader 402–34. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Josephson, O. (2015) Den svenska språkvårdens centralstyrning. Språk Och Stil 2(S): 186–90.

Josephson, O. (2018) Språkpolitik. Stockholm: Morfem.

Källkvist, M. and Hult, F. M. (2016) Discursive mechanisms and human agency in language policy formation: Negotiating bilingualism and parallel language use at a Swedish university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.956044

Kumari Campbell, F. A. (2008) Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory. Disability & Society 23(2): 151–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701841190

Landqvist, M. (2015a) A professional-cultural approach to discrimination: Constructions of police discrimination in two European countries. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10(3): 313–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1071822

Landqvist, M. (2015b) Vad är språklig diskriminering? En analytisk prövning av några pejoriseringsteorier. In M. Landqvist (ed.) Från Social Kategorisering Till Diskriminering: Fyra Studier Av Språk Och Diskriminering Och Ett Modellförslag 97–122. Huddinge: Södertörns högskola. https://doi.org/10.33063/diva-376239

Landqvist, M. (2018) Språkpolitik som ett inslag i kampen mot diskriminering. Språk & Stil NF 28: 176–202. https://doi.org/10.33063/diva-376239

Landqvist, M. (2019) Semiotic spaces in antidiscriminatory political discourse: Naming practices as indexes. Language in Society 48(5): 721–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404519000459

Landqvist, M. and Spetz, J. (2020) Ten years with the Swedish Language Act. Current Issues in Language Planning 21(3): 1–16.

Lind Palicki, L. (2015) Principer och språksyn i språkvårdens diskussioner–exemplet samkönad. In M. Landqvist (ed.) Från Social Kategorisering Till Diskriminering: Fyra Studier Av Språk Och Diskriminering Och Ett Modellförslag 123–52. Text och samtalsstudier från Södertörns högskola 4: 123–52. Huddinge: Södertörns Högskola. https://doi.org/10.7577/nbf.548

Lotman, M. (2002) Umwelt and semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 30(1): 33–40.

Lotman, Y. M. (1990) Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: IB Taurus.

Melin, L. (2020) DN Debatt. ‘När man inte får säga vissa ord blir språket oklart’. Dagens Nyheter, 13 January.

Nord, A., Nyström Höög, C. and Tønnesson, J. L. (2015) Klarspråk och klarspråksarbete–ett tema i tiden. Sakprosa 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5617/sakprosa.1284

Pauwels, A. (2003) Linguistic Sexism and Feminist Linguistic Activism. In J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (eds) The Handbook of Language and Gender 550–70. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch24

Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2016) The discourse-historical approach (DHA). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies 3: 23–61.

RFSL [The Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Intersex Rights] (2019) Word list, updated 9 May. www.rfsl.se/hbtqi-fakta/begreppsordlista

Ricento, T. (2000) Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(2): 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00111

Ross, D. G. (2015) Monkeywrenching plain language: Ecodefense, ethics, and the technical communication of ecotage. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 58(2): 154–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2015.2425135

SFS 2009:600 Språklag [Language Act].

SFS 2017:1081 Diskrimineringslag [Discrimination Act].

Shohamy, E. (2006) Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. Abingdon: Routledge.

Shohamy, E. (2009) Language policy as experiences. Language Problems and Language Planning 33(2): 185–9. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.33.2.06sho

Silverstein, M. (2003) Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23: 193–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(03)00013-2

Socialstyrelsen [The National Board of Health and Welfare] (2019) Word list, updated 1 May. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/dokumentwebb/ovrigt/jamlikhet-hbtq-ordlista.pdf

Spetz, J. (2019) Språklagen Och Medborgaren. Språkrådet: Institute for Language and Folklore.

Spitzmüller, J. (2015) Graphic variation and graphic ideologies: a metapragmatic approach. Social Semiotics 25(2): 126–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1010323

Spitzmüller, J. (2019) Sociolinguistics going ‘wild’: The construction of auratic fields. Journal of Sociolinguistics 23(5): 505–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12383

Spohr, D. (2017) Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media. Business Information Review 34(3): 150–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382117722446

Språkrådet [The Language Council of Sweden] (2020) Retrieved on 16 March 2020 from https://www.isof.se/om-oss/kontakt/sprakradet/in-english.html

Tavits, M. and Pérez, E. O. (2019) Language influences mass opinion toward gender and LGBT equality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(34): 16781–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908156116

Teleman, U. (2001) Grammatiken och språknormerna. Sprog i Norden. 103–18. http://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/sin/issue/archive

Tomlinson, M. and Millie, J. (2017) Introduction: Imagining the monologic. In M. Tomlinson and J. Millie (eds) The Monologic Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190652807.001.0001

Torop, P. (2005) Semiosphere and/as the research object of semiotics of culture. Sign Systems Studies 33(1): 159–71.

Vogel, A. (2014) Laddade ord. Hur nya uttryck, som kategoriserar människor, tas in i svenskan. I: Språk Och Stil 24: 72–100,

Wojahn, D. (2015) Språkaktivism: Diskussioner om feministiska språkförändringar i Sverige från 1960-talet till 2015. Dissertation, Uppsala universitet, Uppsala

Published

2021-04-27

How to Cite

Landqvist, M. (2021). The significance of activist language policies in public debate – a concern for language planning agencies?. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 5(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.18282

Issue

Section

Articles