Structure-based or dynamic usage‑based instruction
long-term effects on (morpho)syntactic and lexical complexity in writing samples
This classroom study aims to explore the instructional effects of structure-based (SB) or dynamic usage-based (DUB) instruction with free response, communicative writing tasks after three years of L2-French instruction on linguistic complexity measures in (morpho)syntax and lexicon. We investigated data from forty-three young high school beginner learners of L2-French after three years of instruction with similar amounts of L2 exposure. The SB treatment included a traditional focus on explicit grammar; the DUB group was taught using the Accelerated Integrated Method, a highly communicative, meaningfocused method without explicit instruction, but with a great deal of exposure and repetition to induce frequency effects. Results after three years show that DUB instruction leads to more linguistic complexity in terms of various (morpho)syntactic and some lexical measures (multi-word sequences coverage). On other lexical measures (such as Guiraud index and average word length), no differences were found. The results are discussed using insights from the dynamic usage-based perspective.
Bartning, I. and Schlyter, S. (2004) Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. Journal of French Language Studies 14(3): 281–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269504001802
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Cortes, V. (2004) If you look at …: lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371
Bulté, B. and Housen, A. (2012) Deﬁning and Operationalising L2 Complexity. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.02bul
Bulté, B., Housen, A., Pierrard, M. and Van Daele, S. (2008) Investigating lexical proficiency development over time – the case of Dutch-speaking learners of French in Brussels. Journal of French Language Studies 18(3): 277–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269508003451
Cobb, T. (2010) Learning about language and learners from computer programs. Reading in a Foreign Language 22(1): 181.
Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossley, S. A., Cai, Z. and McNamara, D. S. (2012) Syntagmatic, paradigmatic, and automatic n-gram approaches to assessing essay quality. In P. M. McCarthy and G. M. Youngblood (eds) Proceedings of the 25th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference 214–19. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
De Graaff, R. (1997) The experanto experiment: effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 249–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197002064
DeKeyser, R. (2003) Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty, and M. H. Long (eds) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition 313–48. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Doughty, C. J. (2003) Instructed SLA: constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. J. Doughty, and M. H. Long (eds) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Doughty, C. and Varela, E. (1998) Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds) Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition 114–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (2002) Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 223–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002073
Ellis, R. (2008) Explicit form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. In B. Spolsky and F. Hult (eds) The Handbook of Educational Linguistics 437–55. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694138.ch31
Genesee, F. (1987) Learning Through Two Languages. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Gombert, W., Keijzer, M. and Verspoor, M. (2018) Explicit versus implicit instruction and accuracy in writing. A longitudinal study. Paper presented at AAAL Conference, Chicago, IL.
Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y. and Novella, M. (2015) Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning. Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages 48: 443–82. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.18goo
Granfeldt, J. and Ågren, M. (2014) SLA developmental stages and teachers’ assessment of written French: exploring Direkt Profil as a diagnostic assessment tool. Language Testing 31(3): 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214526178
Granfeldt, J., Nugues, P., Ågren, M., Thulin, J., Persson, E. and Schlyter, S. (2006) CEFLE and Direkt Profil: a new computer learner corpus in French L2 and a system for grammatical profiling. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation 565–70, Genoa, Italy.
Grant, L. and Ginther, A. (2000) Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing 9(2): 123–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00019-9
Guiraud, P. (1954) Les caractères statistiques du vocabulaire. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Harley, B. and Swain, M. (1984) The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Criper and A. Howatt (eds) Interlanguage 291–311. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hong, N. (2013) Dynamic usage-based approach to second language teaching. Unpublished PhD thesis. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Housen, A. and Kuiken, F. (2009) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 461–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048
Housen, A., Pierrard, M. and Van Daele, S. (2005) Structure complexity and the efficacy of explicit grammar instruction. Investigations in Instructed Second Language Acquisition 235–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197372.2.235
Hulstijn, Y. and De Graaff, R. (1994) Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review 11: 97–112.
Irshad, F. M. (2015) Second language development through the lens of a dynamic usage-based approach. Unpublished PhD thesis. Rijkuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Koster, D. E. S. (2015) A dynamic, usage-based approach to teaching L2 Dutch. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(2): 257–64. https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.4.2.08kos
Kyle, K. and Crossley, S. (2016) The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 34: 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003
Langacker, R. W. (2000) A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow and S. Kemmer (eds) Usage-based Models of Language 1–63. Stanford: CSLI.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012) On the roles of repetition in language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics Review 3(2): 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0009
Laufer, B. (2005) Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. Eurosla Yearbook 5(1): 223–50. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.5.11lau
Lightbown, P. M. and Spada, N. (1994) An innovative program for primary ESL in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly 28(3): 563–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587308
Lightbown, P. and Spada, N. (2013) How Languages are Learned (Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers) (4th edn). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lyster, R. (1987) Speaking immersion. Canadian Modern Language Review 43(4): 701–17. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.43.4.697
Mackey, A. (2006) Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics 27: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami051
Martinez, R. and Schmitt, N. (2012) A phrasal expressions list. Applied Linguistics 33(3): 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams010
Maxwell, W. (2001) Evaluating the effectiveness of the accelerative integrated method for teaching French as a second language. Unpublished MA thesis. University of London Institute in Paris, France.
Myles, F. (2012) Complexity, accuracy and ﬂuency: the role played by formulaic sequences in early interlanguage development. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken and I. Vedder (eds) Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA 71–93. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.04myl
Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L. (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50(3): 417–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L. (2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: the case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 555–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
Ortega, L. (2012) Interlanguage complexity: a construct in search of theoretical renewal. In B. Kortmann and B. Szmrecsanyi (eds) Linguistic Complexity: Second Language Acquisition, Indigenization, Contact 127–55. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Piggott, L. (2019) Effects of explicit and implicit form focused instruction on L2 writing and speaking: a two year classroom based study. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Robinson, P. (1996) Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 27–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014674
Rousse-Malpat, A. (2019) Effectiveness of explicit vs implicit L2 instruction. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Rousse-Malpat, A. and Verspoor, M. H. (2012) Measuring effectiveness in focus on form versus focus on meaning. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(2): 263–76. https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.1.2.07rou
Rousse-Malpat, A. and Verspoor, M. (2018) Foreign language instruction from a dynamic usage-based (DUB) perspective. In A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno and H. I. Park (eds) Usage-inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy 55–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.03rou
Rousse-Malpat, A., Verspoor, M. H. and Visser, S. (2012) Frans leren met AIM in het voortgezet onderwijs (Learning French with AIM in high school). Levende Talen Tijdschrift 3: 3–14.
Schmid, H. J. (2015) A blueprint of the entrenchment-and-conventionalization model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 3(1): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2015-0002
Scott, C. M. and Windsor, J. (2000) General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43(2): 324–39. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4302.324
Shook, D. (1994) FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-to-take phenomenon. Applied Language Learning 52: 57–93.
Spada, N. (1997) Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: a review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching 30(2): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012799
Spada, N. (2011) Beyond form-focused instruction: reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching 44(2): 225–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000224
Spada, N. and Tomita, Y. (2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: a meta‐analysis. Language Learning 60(2): 263–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x
Swain, M. (1988) Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal 6(1): 68–83. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v6i1.542
Tomasello, M. (2003) Constructing a Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Trahey, M. (1996) Positive evidence in second language acquisition: some long term effects. Second Language Research 12(2): 111–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200201
Trahey, M. and White, L. (1993) Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(2): 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011955
Véronique, D. (2009) L’acquisition de la grammaire du français, langue étrangère. Paris: Didier.
Verspoor, M. (2017) Complex dynamic systems theory and L2 pedagogy. In L. Ortega and Z. Han (eds) Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman 143–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.08ver
Verspoor, M. and Schmitt, N. (2013) Language and the lexicon in SLA. In The Routledge Encyclopedia of SLA 353–60. New York: Routledge.
Verspoor, M. and Smiskova, H. (2012) Foreign language writing development from a dynamic usage based perspective. In R. Manchón (ed.) L2 Writing Development: Multiple Perspectives 17–46. New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078303.17
Verspoor, M., de Bot, K. and Xu, X. (2015) The effects of English bilingual education in the Netherlands. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 3(1): 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.1.01ver
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S. and Xu, X. (2012) A dynamic usage-based perspective on L2 writing development. Journal of Second Language Writing 21(3): 239–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.007
West, L. and Verspoor, M. (2016) An impression of foreign language teaching approaches in the Netherlands. Levende Talen Tijdschrift 17(4): 26–36.
Williams, J. and Evans, J. (1998) What kind of focus and on which forms? In C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds) Focus on Form in Classroom Language Acquisition 139–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. and Kim, H. Y. (1998) Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy and Complexity. Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i.
Xu, H. and Lyster, R. (2014) Differential effects of explicit form-focused instruction on morphosyntactic development. Language Awareness 23(1–2): 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863899
Yang, Y. and Lyster, R. (2010) Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32: 235–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990519