Pseudonymous Writing and Improved Course Engagement Using Blogs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v5i2.231Keywords:
blogs, participation, pseudonyms, engagement, active readingAbstract
This study examines students’ use of pseudonymous writing on blogs as a means of engaging with course material in college-level courses. The authors analyse qualitative data from course evaluations from over 40 sections of 13 different courses (N = 1011 students), which were offered between 2005 and 2010 on two different campuses in the northeastern United States. Findings reveal that students perceive improvement in their peer interactions and class participation when provided with the opportunity to further class discussions on class blogs under the guise of a pseudonym. The authors contend that using semi-public blogs as an alternative forum for discussion encourages students to read actively, improve their written communication skills, and engage in dialogue and meaning-making.
References
Ammarell, G. (2000) Network newsgroups as a teaching tool in the social sciences. Teaching Sociology 28(2): 153–59.
Bean, J. (2001) Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bell, M. (2001) Online role-play: Anonymity, engagement and risk. Educational Media International Education Research Complete 38(4): 251–260. Retrieved from EBSCO Host on 7 June 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523980110105141.
Chambliss, M. J. (1995) Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly 30(4): 778–807.
Chester, A. and Gwynne, G. (1998) Online teaching: Encouraging collaboration through anonymity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4:0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083–6101.1998.tb00096.x.
Franklin, B. (1722) “Silence Dogood, No. 2.” retrieved on 12 July 2011 from http://franklinpapers.org/franklin/framedVolumes.jsp.
Freeman, M. A. and Capper, J. M. (1999) Exploiting the web for education: An anonymous asynchronous role simulation. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 15 (1): 95–116.
Herrington, A. J. (1981) Writing to learn: Writing across the disciplines. College English 43(4): 379–387.
Hodges Persell, C. (2004) Using focused web-based discussions to enhance student engagement and deep understanding. Teaching Sociology 32(1): 61–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0403200107.
Howard, J. R., Short, L. B. and Clark, S. M. (1996). Students’ participation in the mixed-age college classroom. Teaching Sociology 24(1): 8–24.
Jaffee, D. (1997) Asynchronous learning: Technology and pedagogical strategy in a distance learning course. Teaching Sociology 25(4): 262–277.
Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., VanDerHeide, J., Kuhn, D. and Andriessen, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly 46(3): 273–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/rrQ.46.3.4.
Pearson, A. F. (2010) Real problems, virtual solutions: Engaging students online. Teaching Sociology 38(3): 207–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092055X10370115.
Sorcinelli, M. D., and Elbow, P. (eds.) (1997) Writing to Learn: Strategies for Assigning and Responding to Writing across the Disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 69. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tiene, D. (2000) Online discussions: A survey of advantages and disadvantages compared to face-to-face discussions. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 9(4): 369–382.
Valentine, C. G. (2001) Electronic sex-talk: The uses and dynamics of computer-mediated discussion groups in a team-taught human sexuality class. Teaching Sociology 29(1): 48–61.
Warschauer, M. (2010) New tools for teaching writing. Language Learning & Technology 14(1), 3–8.
Weaver, R. R. and Qi, J. (2005) Classroom organization and participation: College students’ perceptions. Journal of Higher Education 76(5): 570–601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0038.