Crafting scenes
Improving narrative writing through imaginative embodiment and linguistic choices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.26816Keywords:
writing instruction, primary school writing, narrative writing, metalinguistic understanding, qualitative researchAbstract
Effective narrative writers create immersive reader experiences through precise linguistic choices. Teachers can support effective linguistic choice-making in young writers through the process of imaginative embodiment, a method of narrative thinking framed by cognitive stylistics concepts and their embodied effects. In this article, I assess the effects of an imaginative embodiment pedagogy on fifth grade writers’ narratives by examining how their linguistic choices contribute to immersion. As part of the study, four Grade 5 teachers attended a training session on imaginative embodiment and applied the approach throughout a nine-week narrative writing unit with 12 students via one-on-one writing conferences. To study the effects of the approach, a linguistic analysis was conducted on student writing completed before and after the writing unit. The analysis was driven by a stylistic checklist that codes grammatical features to embodied effects, as well as an interpretive analysis of these features’ overall effectiveness on immersion. Findings suggested that students’ linguistic choices changed in response to learning the process of imaginative embodiment. Specifically, choices were characterized by their embodied effects, contributing to greater textual immersion. This suggests that teaching imaginative embodiment can improve writers’ narratives by affording them specific strategies for expressing meaning.
References
Anderson, C. (2000). How’s it going?: A practical guide to conferring with student writers. Heinemann.
Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.). F-10 curriculum, learning areas, English. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/learning-areas/
Bergen, B. (2012). Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. Basic Books.
Berry, R. (2005). Making the most of metalanguage. Language Awareness, 14(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410508668817
Camps, A., & Milian, M. (2000). Metalinguistic activity in learning to write. Amsterdam University Press.
Carter, R., & Nash, W. (1990). Seeing through language: A guide to styles of English writing. Wiley-Blackwell.
Chen, H., & Myhill, D. (2016). Children talking about writing: Investigating metalinguistic understanding. Linguistics and Education, 35, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.07.004
Common Core State Standards. (2010). National Governors Association and Council of Chief School Officers. https://www.thecorestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/
Cushing, I. (2021). Re-contextualising cognitive grammar for school teaching. In M. Giovanelli, C. Harrison, & L. Nuttall (Eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Grammar and Style (pp. 241–259). Bloomsbury.
Department for Education. (2013). English programmes of study Key Stages 1 and 2. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7de93840f0b62305b7f8ee/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_English_220714.pdf
Gaiman, N. (2008). The Graveyard Book. Harper Collins.
Gavins, J. (2007). Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Gebhard, M., Chen, I., & Britton, L. (2014). ‘Miss, nominalization is a nominalization’: English language learners’ use of SFL metalanguage and their literacy practices. Linguistics and Education, 26, 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.003
Gibbs, R. (2006). Metaphor interpretations as embodied simulation. Mind & Language, 21(3), 434–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x
Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4–6: A national survey. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1086/651193
Giovanelli, M. (2014). Teaching grammar structure and meaning: Exploring theory and practice for post-16 English language teachers. Routledge.
Giovanelli, M., & Harrison, C. (2018). Cognitive grammar in stylistics: A practical guide. Bloomsbury Academic.
Giovanelli, M., & Harrison, C. (2022). Cognitive grammar in the classroom: A case study. In S. Zyngier & G. Watson (Eds.), Pedagogical Stylistics in the 21st Century (pp. 131–158). Palgrave Macmillan.
Gombert, E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Graham, S., Capizzi, A., Harris, K., Hebert, M., & Morphy, P. (2014). Teaching writing to middle school students: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 27, 1015–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9495-7
Gutierrez, X. (2008). What does metalinguistic activity in learners’ interaction during a collaborative L2 writing task look like? The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00785.x
Healey, B., & Gardner, P. (2021). Writing, grammar and the body: A cognitive stylistics framework for teaching upper primary narrative writing. Literacy, 55(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12242
Healey, B., & Gardner, P. (2022). Writer agency, choice-making and embodied grammar. English in Australia, 57(1), 39–52.
Healey, B., & Gardner, P. (2023). Explicit embodiment of narrative worlds: A case study of student-teacher concept-led grammar conferencing for writing. Language Awareness, 32(2), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2022.2092122
Holme, R. (2009). Cognitive linguistics and language teaching. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kolln, M. (2007). Rhetorical Grammar: Grammatical Choices, Rhetorical Effects (5th ed.). Pearson.
Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.
Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Macken-Horarik, M., Sandiford, C., Love, K., & Unsworth, L. (2015). New ways of working ‘with grammar in mind’ in school English: Insights from systemic functional grammatics. Linguistics and Education, 31, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.07.004
Malakoff, M. (1992). Translation ability: A natural bilingual and metalinguistic skill. In R. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 515–530). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Morpurgo, M. (1985). Why the Whales Came. Heinemann.
Myhill, D. (2021). Grammar reimagined: Foregrounding understanding of language choice in writing. English in Education, 55(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2021.1885975
Myhill, D. (2022). Grammar as choice: Teaching students the craft of writing. Journal of Teaching Writing, 36(1), 17–36.
Myhill, D., Jones, S., Lines, H., & Watson, A. (2012). Re-thinking grammar: The impact of embedded grammar teaching on students’ writing and students’ metalinguistic understanding. Research Papers in Education, 72(2), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.637640
Myhill, D., Lines, H., & Jones, S. (2018). Writing like a reader: Developing metalinguistic understanding to support reading-writing connections. In R. Joshi (Ed.), Reading-Writing Connections: Towards Integrative Literacy Science (Vol. 19). Springer.
Myhill, D., Lines, H., & Watson, A. (2012). Making meaning with grammar: A repertoire of possibilities. English in Australia, 47(3), 29–38.
Norriss, A. (2004). Aquila. Puffin.
Rule, H. (2017). Sensing the sentence: An embodied simulation approach to rhetorical grammar. Composition Studies, 45(1), 19–38.
Sands, K. (2015). The blackthorn key. Simon and Schuster.
Scott, J. (2013). Creative writing and stylistics: Creative and critical approaches. Palgrave Macmillian.
Scott, J. (2016). Worlds from Words: Theories of world-building as creative writing toolbox. In J. Gavins & E. Lahey (Eds.), World Building: Discourse in the Mind (pp. 127–145). Bloomsbury.
Semino, E., & Culpeper, J. (2002). Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Snyders, C., & Bahnson, S. (2014). I wish we could make books all day!: An observational study of kindergarten children during writing workshop. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(6), 405–414.
Stockwell, P. (2015). Cognitive stylistics. In R. Jones (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 233–245). Routledge.
Stockwell, P. (2020). Cognitive poetics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Talmy, L. (2000). Towards a cognitive semantics, Vol 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge University Press.
Tolkien, J. R. R. (2002). The lord of the rings. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
van Lier, L. (1998). The relationship between consciousness, interaction and language learning. Language Awareness, 7(2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658419808667105
Watson, A., & Newman, R. (2017). Talking grammatically: L1 adolescent metalinguistic reflection on writing. Language Awareness, 26(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1410554
