Audience awareness in elementary school students’ texts

Variations within and between grades 1–3

Authors

  • Gustaf B Skar Norwegian University of Science and Technology Author
  • Arne Johannes Aasen Norwegian University of Science and Technology Author
  • Anne H Kvistad Norwegian University of Science and Technology Author
  • Marita B Johansen Norwegian University of Science and Technology Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.21541

Keywords:

writing development, elementary school, text analysis, AUDIENCE AWARENESS, ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WRITING, WRITING DEVELOPMENT

Abstract

In this study, we investigated audience awareness characteristics in elementary school students’ texts. To achieve this goal, we used a cross-sectional study design and sampled texts from 90 students in grades 1–3 (N = 270). These texts formed a corpus that was qualitatively analyzed by the research team. We used descriptive statistics to identify audience awareness patterns. Based on previous research, we expected to find considerable variation within and between grades. Therefore, we posed the following two research questions: (1) What characterizes audience awareness within grades 1–3? and (2) How does audience awareness develop between grades 1–3? We found that students used various rhetorical moves oriented toward the audience, such as greetings and closings, meta-text, explanations, and justifications. The results indicated that the students exhibited several characteristics related to audience awareness in all three grades. However, the variation within the grades was significant, while the variation between the grades was less pronounced.

References

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Berge, K. L. (2012). Hva er det systemisk-funksjonell grammatikk ikke gjør? Om forskjellen mellom SFL og tekstvitenskap. In T. Hestbæk Andersen & M. Boeriis (Eds.), Nordisk Socialsemiotik. Pædagogiske, multimodale og sprogvidenskabelige landvindinger (pp. 299–318). Syddansk Universitetsforlag.

Berge, K. L., Evensen, L. S., & Thygesen, R. (2016). The wheel of writing: A model of the writing domain for the teaching and assessing of writing as a key competency. The Curriculum Journal, 27(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1129980

Berninger, V. W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511269

Block, M. K., & Strachan, S. L. (2019). The impact of external audience on second graders’ writing quality. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 58(2). https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol58/iss2/5

Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29(5), 591–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599408248175

Brisk, M. E. (2012). Young bilingual writers’ control of grammatical person in different genres. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1086/663733

Carvalho, J. B. (2002). Developing audience awareness in writing. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(3), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00175

Cassirer, P. (2003). Stil, stilistik & stilanalys. Natur och kultur.

Cohen, M., & Riel, M. (1989). The effect of distant audiences on students’ writing. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312026002143

Durán, L. (2017). Audience and young bilingual writers. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(1), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X16683420

Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 665–697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665

Evensen, L. S. (2002). Convention from below: Negotiating interaction and culture in argumentative writing. Written Communication, 19(3), 382–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/074108802237750

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. http://www.jstor.org/stable/356600

Gamlem, S. M., Rogne, W. M., Rønneberg, V., & Uppstad, P. H. (2020). Study protocol: DigiHand – the emergence of handwriting skills in digital classooms. Nordic Journal of Literacy Research, 6(2), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v6.2115

Graham, S. (1997). Executive control in the revising of students with learning and writing difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.223

Graham, S. (1999). The role of text production skills in writing development: A special issue - I. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(2), 75–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511267

Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406

Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Hebert, M. (2011). It is more than just the message: Presentation effects in scoring writing. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v44i4.6687

Graham, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2016). Writing education around the globe: Introduction and call for a new global analysis. Reading and Writing, 29(5), 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9640-1

Graham, S., Skar, G. B., & Falk, D. Y. (2021). Teaching writing in the primary grades in Norway: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 34(2), 529–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10080-y

Gregg, N., Sigalas, S. A., Hoy, C., Wisenbaker, J., & McKinley, C. (1996). Sense of audience and the adult writer: A study across competence levels. Reading and Writing, 8(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00423929

Gwet, K. L. (2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability. Advanced Analytics, LLC.

Håland, A., Hoem, T. F., & McTigue, E. M. (2019). Writing in first grade: The quantity and quality of practices in Norwegian classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-018-0908-8

Holliway, D. R., & McCutchen, D. (2004). Audience perspective in young writers’ composing and revising. In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (Vol. 13, pp. 87–101). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1

Kellogg, R. T. (1999). The psychology of writing. Oxford University Press.

Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1

Kroll, B. M. (1978). Cognitive egocentrism and the problem of audience awareness in written discourse. Research in the Teaching of English, 12(3), 269–281. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40170715

Limpo, T., & Graham, S. (2020). The role of handwriting instruction in writers’ education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1692127

Midgette, E., Haria, P., & MacArthur, C. (2008). The effects of content and audience awareness goals for revision on the persuasive essays of fifth- and eighth-grade students. Reading and Writing, 21(1–2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9067-9

Moore, N. S., & MacArthur, C. A. (2012). The effects of being a reader and of observing readers on fifth-grade students’ argumentative writing and revising. Reading and Writing, 25(6), 1449–1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9327-6

Pinto, G., Tarchi, C., & Bigozzi, L. (2016). Development in narrative competences from oral to written stories in five- to seven-year-old children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.001

Purves, A. C. (1992). Conclusion. In A. C. Purves (Ed.), The IEA study of written comprehension II: Education and performance in fourteen countries (Vol. 2, pp. 199–203). Pergamon.

Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., Tillema, M., Van Steendam, E., Raedts, M., den Bergh, H., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., Tillema, M., Van Steendam, E., & Raedts, M. (2012). Writing. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 3: Application to learning and teaching (pp. 189–227). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13275-009

Roen, D. H., & Willey, R. J. (1988). The effects of audience awareness on drafting and revising. Research in the Teaching of English, 22(1), 75–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171133

Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088397014004004

Russell, D. R., & Yañez, A. (2003). ‘Big picture people rarely become historians’: Genre systems and the contradictions of general education. In C. Bazerman & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves, writing societies: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 331–362). WAC Clearinghouse. http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies

Sato, K., & Matsushima, K. (2006). Effects of audience awareness on procedural text writing. Psychological Reports, 99(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.99.1.51-73

Sharples, M. (1999). How we write: Writing as creative design. Routledge.

Skar, G. B. (2017). The Norwegian national sample-based writing test 2016: Technical report. Nasjonalt senter for skriveopplæring og skriveforsking. http://www.skrivesenteret.no/uploads/files/Skriveproven2017/NSBWT2017.pdf

Skar, G. B., Aasen, A. J., & Jølle, L. (2020). Functional writing in the primary years: Protocol for a mixed-methods writing intervention study. Nordic Journal of Literacy Research, 6(1), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v6.2040

Skar, G. B., Jølle, L., & Aasen, A. J. (2020). Establishing scales to assess writing proficiency development in young learners. Acta Didactica Norge, 14(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.7909

Skar, G. B., Kvistad, A. H., Johansen, M. B., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Aasen, A. J. (2022). Identifying Texts in the Warning Zone: Empirical Foundation of a Screening Instrument to Adapt Early Writing Instruction. Writing & Pedagogy, 13.1, 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.22095

Skar, G. B., Lei, P.-W., Graham, S., Aasen, A. J., Johansen, M. B., & Kvistad, A. H. (2021). Handwriting fluency and the quality of primary grade students’ writing. Reading and Writing, 35, 509–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10185-y

Wollman-Bonilla, J. E. (2001). Can first-grade writers demonstrate audience awareness? Reading Research Quarterly, 36(2), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.2.4

CC BY-NC-ND logo

Published

2022-07-02

Issue

Section

Young Students’ Writing Development

How to Cite

Skar, G. B., Aasen, A. J., Kvistad, A. H., & Johansen, M. B. (2022). Audience awareness in elementary school students’ texts: Variations within and between grades 1–3. Writing and Pedagogy, 13(1-3), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.21541

Most read articles by the same author(s)