Validating scales for the early development of writing proficiency

Authors

  • Jeppe Bundsgaard Aarhus University Author
  • Kristine Kabel Aarhus University Author
  • Jesper Bremholm National Centre for Reading, Danish University Colleges Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.21491

Keywords:

student texts, early writing development, Rasch model, validating linguistic framework, lower primary school, Denmark

Abstract

This paper aims to validate scales for the early development of writing proficiency based on a framework used to linguistically describe multiple dimensions of writing development in 6–9 year-old Danish-speaking students and to lay the statistical foundation for empirically describing proficiency levels in emergent writers. The analysis is based on the Rasch model and was conducted on texts (n = 803) written by Year 0–2 students using the computer app WriteReader. The paper introduces both the model and the theory behind it, including the rationale for using this model, and it presents the main analytical steps taken and decisions made in the study, which is part of the large-scale Danish research project entitled Teaching Platform for Developing and Automatically Tracking Early Stage Literacy Skills (ATEL, 2018–2023). The results show that it is possible to identify detailed levels of early writing development in four dimensions: 1) text construction, 2) sentence construction, 3) verbals, and 4) modifiers.

References

Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., & Wilson, M. (2012). The Rasch rating model and the disordered threshold controversy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(4), 547–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164411432166

Andersen, E. B. (1973). Conditional inference for multiple choice questionnaires. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 26(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1973.tb00504.x

Andersen, T. H., & Holsting, A. E. M. (2015). Teksten i grammatikken [The text in the grammar]. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.

Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871

Bremholm, J., Bundsgaard, J., & Kabel, K. (2022). Proficiency levels for early writing development. Writing & Pedagogy, 13(1–3), 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.22133

Bundsgaard, J., & Kreiner, S. (2020). RDigram: Analysis of items from tests and surveys [Manual].

Bundsgaard, J., Kabel, K., & Bremholm, J. (2021). Rasch-analyser af data fra ATEL-projektet. DPU, Aarhus University.

Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.

Crosthwaite, P. (2016). A longitudinal multidimensional analysis of EAP writing: Determining EAP course effectiveness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 166e178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.04.005

Diderichsen, P. (1946). Elementær dansk grammatik [Elementary Danish grammar]. Gyldendal.

Donahue, C., & Lillis, T. (2014). Models of writing and text production. In E.-M. Jakobs & D. P. Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (pp. 55–78). De Gruyter.

Evensen, L. S. (1997). Å skrive seg stor: Utviking av koherens og social identitet i tidlig skriving [To write one self bigger: Development of coherence and social identity in early writing]. In L. S. Evensen & T. L. Hoel (Eds.), Skriveteorier og skolepraksis (pp. 155–178). LNU/Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.

Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in ‘GNYS AT WRK.’ The Reading Teacher, 36(2), 192–200. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20198182

Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Read Writ, 26, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2

Hall-Mills, S., & Apel, K. (2015). Linguistic feature development across grades and genre in elementary writing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(2), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning (Reprint ed.). Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Education.

Hansen, E., & Heltoft, L. (2011). Grammatik over det Danske Sprog [Danish Language Grammar]. Det Danske Sprog og Litteraturselskab & Syddansk Universitetsforlag.

Harpin, W. (1976). The second R: Writing development in the junior school. Unwin.

Hudson, R. (2009). Measuring maturity. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, M. Nystrand & J. Riley (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of writing development (1st ed., pp. 349–362). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. National Council of Teachers of English.

Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. Longman.

Jeffery, J. V., Elf, N., Skar, G. B., & Wilcox, K. C. (2019). Writing development and education standards in cross-national perspective. Writing & Pedagogy, 10(3), 333–370. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.34587

Kabel, K., Bremholm, J., & Bundsgaard, J. (2022). A framework for identifying early writing development. Writing & Pedagogy, 13(1–3), 51–88. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.21467

Kelderman, H. (1988). Common item equating using the loglinear Rasch model. Journal of Educational Statistics, 13(4), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986013004319

Korsgaard, K., Vitger, M., & Hannibal, S. (2015). Opdagende skrivning – en vej ind i læsningen [Explorative writing – a pathway to reading]. Dansklærerforeningen.

Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2011). Item screening in graphical loglinear Rasch models. Psychometrika, 76(2), 228–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-011-9203-y

Kress, G. (1982). Learning to write. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. Routledge.

Krogh, E., & Jakobsen, K. S. (Eds.). (2019). Understanding young people’s writing development. London: Routledge.

Liberg, C. (1993). Hur barn lär sig läsa och skriva [How children are learning (themselves) to read and write]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Linacre, J. M. (2003). Estimating 50% cumulative probability (Rasch-Thurstone) thresholds. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(4), 901. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt164e.htm

Lord, F. M., Tukey, J. W., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

Mair, P., Hatzinger, R., & Maier, M. J. (2020). eRm: Extended rasch modeling [manual]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=eRm

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.

Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2013). Goodness-of-fit assessment of item response theory models. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 11(3), 71–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2013.831680

McGee, L. M., & Richgels, D. J. (2000). Literacy’s beginnings: Supporting young readers and writers (3rd edition). Allyn and Bacon.

Ministry of Children and Education (2019a). Børnehaveklassen. Fælles Mål [Year 0. Common Standards]. Retrieved on 1 September 2021 from: http://www.emu.dk

Ministry of Children and Education (2019b). Faghæfte for dansk [National curriculum for Danish L1]. Retrieved on 1 September 2021 from: http://www.emu.dk

Mueller, M. (2020). iarm: Item analysis in Rasch models [Manual]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=iarm

Myhill, D. (2008). Towards a linguistic model of sentence development in writing. Language and Education, 22(5), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152655

O’Donnell, R. C., Griffin, W. J., & Norris, R. C. (1967). Syntax of kindergarten and elementary school children: A transformational analysis. NCTE Research report no. 8, National Council of Teachers of English.

Perrera, K. (1984). Children’s Writing and Reading: Analysing Classroom. Blackwell.

R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [manual]. https://www.R-project.org/

Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danmarks Pædagogiske Institut.

Robitzsch, A., Kiefer, T., & Wu, M. (2020). TAM: Test analysis modules [manual]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TAM

Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M. (2000). Interpreting literature: The role of appraisal. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Researching language in schools and communities (pp. 222–244). Cassell.

Skar, G. B., Jølle, L., & Aasen, A. J. (2020). Establishing rating scales to assess writing proficiency development in young learners. Acta Didactica Norden, 14(1), 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/adno.7909

Weaver, C. (1996). Teaching grammar in context. Heinemann.

Weigle, S. C., & Friginal, E. (2015). Linguistic dimensions of impromptu test essays compared with successful student disciplinary writing: Effects of language background, topic, and L2 proficiency. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 18, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.03.006

Wilson, M. R. (2011). Some notes on the term: ‘Wright Map.’ Rasch Measurement Transactions, 25(3), 1331. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt253b.htm

Wray, D., & Medwell, J. (2006). Progression in writing and the Northern Ireland levels for writing: A research review undertaken for CCEA. University of Warwick.

Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. MESA Press.

WriteReader. (2020). WriteReader vision for increasing literacy skills in classroom and at home. WriteReader. https://www.writereader.com/our-vision/

Wu, M., & Adams, R. J. (2013). Properties of Rasch residual fit statistics. Journal of Applied Measurement, 14(4), 339–355. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24064576/

Published

2022-07-02

Issue

Section

Young Students’ Writing Development

How to Cite

Bundsgaard, J., Kabel, K., & Bremholm, J. (2022). Validating scales for the early development of writing proficiency. Writing and Pedagogy, 13(1-3), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.21491