Helping EAL academics navigate asymmetrical power relations in co-authorship
Research-based materials for ERPP workshops
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.20495Keywords:
Exiled Academics, Co-Authorship Practices, EAL (English As An Additional Language) Academic Literacies Development, English For Research Publication Purposes (ERPP), Teaching MaterialsAbstract
This paper presents, discusses, and evaluates research-based materials for English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP) teaching, based on a study conducted with exiled academics supported by CARA (Council for At-Risk Academics) and their UK-based co-authors who provided textual interventions on their texts. Using data from interviews with exiled academics and their UK-based co-authors/mentors as well as their article drafts and textual interventions, we present teaching materials for ERPP workshops aimed at raising the participants’ awareness of issues that may arise in co-authorship involving asymmetrical power relations, such as those between exiled academics and their UK-based co-authors/mentors. The materials take the shape of data-based scenarios which ask workshop attendees to consider experiential co-authorship narratives involving (i) the issue of ‘parochialism’, i.e., failure to indicate the relevance of one’s research to a larger audience, (ii) issues with the type and amount of feedback regarding writer development and text production, (iii) blurred lines of co-authorship roles, and (iv) authority issues in interdisciplinary collaborative writing. Each scenario is followed by a research-informed discussion. We argue that scenario-based awareness-raising activities can sensitize all parties in asymmetrical co-authorship pairs/groups to common challenges that arise in such collaborations, help them navigate collaborative writing successfully, and encourage them to reflect on their own co-authorship practices. We conclude by discussing the merits of the scenario-based approach to developing materials for ERPP teaching.
References
Barry, C. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., Bradley, C., & Stevenson, F. (1999). Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 9(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129121677
Belcher, D. (2007). A bridge too far? TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 396–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00066.x
Belcher, D. D., Serrano, F. J. B., & Yang, H. S. (2016). English for professional academic purposes. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 502–514). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657455-52
Bennett, K. (2014). The smeiperiphery of academic writing: Discourses, communities and practices. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137351197
Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: Views of researchers in a British medical faculty. British Medical Journal, 314(7086), 1009–1012). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009
Bozeman, B., Fay, D., Slade, C. P., Bozeman, B., Fay, Á. D., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 1–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8
Bozeman, B., & Youtie, J. (2016). Trouble in paradise: Problems in academic research co-authoring. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(6), 1717–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11948-015-9722-5/FIGURES/1
Çakir, M. P., Acartürk, C., Alkan, S., & Akbulut, U. (2019). Multi-authoring and its impact on university rankings: A case study of CERN effect on Turkish universities. Studies in Higher Education, 44(6), 1052–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1414780
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2010). Making professional academic writing practices visible: Designing research-based heuristics to support English-medium text production. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice (pp. 321–345). Cambridge University Press.
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2019). Collaborative writing, academic socialization, and the negotiation of identity. In P. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice writers and scholarly publication (pp. 177–194). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-510
Duff, P. A. (2010). Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000048
Ede, L. S., & Lunsford, A. A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Southern Illinois University Press.
Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner: The relational turn in expertise. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3969-9
Feak, C. B., & Swales, J. M. (2010). Writing for publication: Corpus-informed materials for postdoctoral fellows in perinatology. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice (pp. 279–300). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587862
Harwood, N. (2010). Research-based materials to demystify academic citation for postgraduates. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory & practice (pp. 301–321). Cambridge University Press.
Harwood, N., & Petric, B. (2017). Experiencing master’s supervision: Perspectives of international students and their supervisors. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315680934
Harwood, N., & Petric, B. (2019). Helping international master’s students navigate dissertation supervision: Research-informed discussion and awareness-raising activities. Journal of International Students, 9(1), 150–171. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v9i1.276
Heron, M., Parkinson, T., Alajaj, N., & Khuder, B. (2020). Interdisciplinary collaborative writing for publication with exiled academics: The nature of relational expertise. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1845953
Hren, D., Sambunjak, D., Ivaniš, A., Marušic, M., & Marušic, A. (2007). Perceptions of authorship criteria: Effects of student instruction and scientific experience. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(7), 428–432. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.017160
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, Ken. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
Khuder, B., & Petric, B. (2020). Academic socialisation through collaboration: Textual interventions in supporting exiled scholars’ academic literacies development. Education and Conflict Review, 3, 24–28.
Khuder, B. (2021). Science in exile: EAL academic literacies development of established Syrian academics. (Unpublished PhD thesis), Birkbeck, University of London.
Khuder, B., & Petric, B. (2021). Walking on thin ice: Reflexivity in doing ethnography. In I. Guillén-Galve & A. Bocanegra-Valle (Eds.), Ethnographies of academic writing research: Theory, methods, and interpretation (pp. 106–123). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/RMAL.1.06KHU
Khuder, B., & Petric, B. (2022). Academic texts in motion: A text history study of co-authorship interactions in writing. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 3(1), pp. 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.22001.khu
King, J. (2016). Interview with James King (IIE-SRF). International Journal of Research from the Front-Line, 1(2), 10–16.
Kuld, L., & O’Hagan, J. (2018). Rise of multi-authored papers in economics: Demise of the ‘lone star’ and why? Scientometrics, 114(3), 1207–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2588-3
Kwiek, M. (2020). What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: Changing national patterns in global contexts. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1749254
Larivière, V., Pontille, D., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2021). Investigating the division of scientific labor using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT). Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1162/QSS_A_00097
Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2020). Teaching English for research publication purposes (ERPP): A review of language teachers’ pedagogical initiatives. English for Specific Purposes, 59, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.002
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Routledge.
Lingard, L., Schryer, C. F., Spafford, M. M., & Campbell, S. L. (2007). Negotiating the politics of identity in an interdisciplinary research team. Qualitative Research, 7(4), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107082305
Logan, J. M., Bean, S. B., & Myers, A. E. (2017). Author contributions to ecological publications: What does it mean to be an author in modern ecological research? In PLoS ONE, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179956
Mena, I. B., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Capobianco, B. M. (2013). Socialization experiences resulting from doctoral engineering teaching assistantships. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2013.11777285
Miller, J. L. (1992). Exploring power and authority issues in a collaborative research project. Theory Into Practice, 31, 165–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/1476403
Murray, R., & Cunningham, E. (2011). Managing researcher development: ‘Drastic transition’? Studies in Higher Education, 36(7), 831–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.482204
Parish, A. J., Boyack, K. W., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research. PLoS ONE, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0189742
Parkinson, T., Zoubir, T., Abdullateef, S., Abedtalas, M., Alyamani, G., Al Ibrahim, Z., Al Husni, M., Omar, F. A., Hajhamoud, H., Iboor, F., Allito, H., Jenkins, M., Rashwani, A., Sennou, A., & Shaban, F. (2018). ‘We are still here’: The stories of Syrian academics in exile. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 20(3/4), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-06-2018-0013
Primack, R. B., Cigliano, J. A., & Parsons, C. (2014). Co-authors gone bad – how to avoid publishing conflicts. Biological Conversation, 167, 277–280. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320714002304?via%3Dihub
Sheikh, K. (2016). Scholars describe exodus from Syria. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5683
Stoller, F. L. (2016). EAP materials and tasks. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of english for academic purposes (pp. 577–591). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657455-58
Storch, N. (2018). Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 51(2), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000034
Tarkang, E. E., Kweku, M., & Zotor, F. B. (2017). Publication practices and responsible authorship: A review article. Journal of Public Health in Africa, 8(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.4081/JPHIA.2017.723
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Cognition and language. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology. Plenum Press.
Wallerstein, I. M. (1991). Geopolitics and geoculture: Essays on the changing world-system. Cambridge University Press.
