A genre and discourse-based examination of audio commentary

Authors

  • Melody Denny University of Northern Colorado Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.17841

Keywords:

feedback, audio commentary, student perceptions, genre analysis, discourse analysis

Abstract

Providing comments on student writing is one of the most important, difficult, and time-consuming activities instructors undertake. Many studies have examined written feedback, and much research has shown the problems associated with this form, ranging from time spent providing thoughtful feedback to students’ confusion about the commentary. Some instructors have used audio commentary to address these issues. Audio commentary has been researched for years; the results have indicated that students prefer audio commentary, and it is perceived as more personal and positive by instructors and students. To date, little research has looked closely at audio commentary to understand if or how it might differ from written in form and function. This research uses as multicase approach and genre analysis to examine the organisational moves and discourse analysis uncover why audio commentary is perceived differently by both producers and consumers of this genre. Results show that audio commentary does not differ in form or function from its written counterpart, but metadiscursive features may play a role in how the genre is perceived by both instructors and students, providing real evidence of how audio commentary is different from written.

Author Biography

  • Melody Denny, University of Northern Colorado

    Melody Denny is an assistant professor and writing center director in the Department of English, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, at the University of Northern Colorado, United States. Her research interests include writing center studies, discourse and conversation analysis, composition pedagogy, responding to student work, and environmental writing and rhetoric.

References

Anson, C. M. (1997) In our own voices: Using recorded commentary to respond to writing. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 69: 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.6909

Bhatia, V. K. (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.

Bardine, B. A., Bardine, M. S., and Deegan, E. F. (2000) Beyond the red pen: Clarifying our role in the response process. English Journal 90(1): 94–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/821738

Bauer, S. (2011) When I stopped writing on their papers: Accommodating the needs of student writers with audio comments. English Journal 101(2): 64–67.

Berzsenyi, C. A. (2001) Comments to comments: Teachers and students in written dialogue about critical revision. Composition Studies 29(2): 71–92.

Bilbro, J., Iluzada, C., and Clark, D. E. (2013) Responding effectively to composition students: Comparing student perceptions of written and audio feedback. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 24(1): 47–83.

Bowden, D. (2018) Comments on student papers: Student perspectives. Journal of Writing Assessment, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.journalofwritingassessment.org/article.php?article=121.

Bradshaw, M. J. (2019) Practical tips for use of audio feedback on student writing assignments. Nurse Educator 45(2): 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000681

Cann, A. (2014) Engaging students with audio feedback. Bioscience Education 22(1): https://doi.org/10.11120/beej.2014.00027

Cavanaugh, A. J. and Song, L. (2014) Audio feedback versus written feedback: Instructors’ and students’ perspectives. MERLOT Journal of Online Teaching and Learning 10(1): 122–138.

Connors, R. and Lunsford, A. A. (1993) Teacher’s rhetorical comments on student papers. College Composition and Communication 44: 200–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/358839

Creswell, J. W. (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches, 4th Edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Cunningham, J. M. (2019) Composition students’ opinions of and attention to instructor feedback. Journal of Response to Writing 5(1): 4–38.

Devitt, A., Reiff, M. J., and Barwashi, A. (2004) Scenes of Writing: Strategies for Composing with Genres. New York: Pearson.

Edington, A. (2004) Encourage collaboration with students on teacher response. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 31(3): 287–296.

Fawcett, H. and Oldfield, J. (2016) Investigating expectations and experiences of audio and written assignment feedback in first-year undergraduate students. Teaching in Higher Education 21(1): 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1115969

Ferris, D. (1997) The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly 31(2): 315–339. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3588049. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588049

Grouling, J. (2018) The genre of teacher comments from hard copy to iPad. Journal of Response to Writing 4(1): 70–99.

Hanna, K. J. (2006) Student perceptions of teacher comments: Relationships between specific aspects of teacher comments and writing apprehension. Thesis and Dissertations. Retrieved from https://commons.und.edu/theses/895.

Hillocks, G. (1986) Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching English. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

Hyland, K. (2005) Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2016) Writing with attitude: Conveying a stance in academic texts. In E. Hinkel (ed.) Teaching Grammar to Speakers of Other Languages, 246–265. New York: Routledge.

Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., and Wells, J. (2007) Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students’ sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(2): 3–25. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i2.1724

Ice, P., Swan, K., Diaz, S., Kupczynski, L., and Swan-Dagen, A. (2010) An analysis of students’ perceptions of the value and efficacy of instructors’ auditory and text-based feedback modalities across multiple conceptual levels. Journal of Educational Computing Research 43(1): 113–134. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.43.1.g

Johns, A. M. (2003) Genre and ESL/EFL composition instruction. In B. Knoll (ed.), Exploring the Dynamics of Second Language Writing, 195–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524810.014

Johnstone, B. (2008) Discourse analysis (2nd Ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Keane, K., McCrea, D., and Russell, M. (2018) Personalizing feedback using voice comments. Open Praxis 10(4): 309–324. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.4.909

Killoran, J. B. (2013) Reel-to-reel tapes, cassettes, and digital audio media: Reverberations from a half-century of recorded-audio response to student writing. Computers and Composition 30: 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2013.01.001

Knauf, H. (2016) Reading, listening, and feeling: Audio feedback as a component of an inclusive learning culture at universities. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 41(1): 442–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1021664

Knoblauch, C. H. and Brannon, L. (1981) Teacher commentary on student writing: The state of the art. Freshman English News 10(2): 1–3.

Lees. E. O. (1979) Evaluating student writing. College Composition and Communication 30: 370–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/356714

Lunt, T. and Curran, J. (2010) Are you listening? The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback. Assessment in Higher Education 35: 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902977772

Mackiewicz, J. and Thompson, I. K. (2015) Talk about Writing: The Tutoring Strategies of Experienced Writing Center Tutors. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768595

McEnery, T., Xiao, R., and Tono, Y. (2006) Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. New York: Routledge.

Merry, S. and Orsmond, P. (2008) Students’ attitudes to and usage of academic feedback provided via audio files. Bioscience Education E-Journal 11. Retrieved from www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol11/beej-11-1.pdf. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.11.3

Mellen, C. and Sommers, J. (2003) Audiotaped response and the two-year-campus writing classroom: The two-sided desk, the ‘guy with the axe,’ and the chirping birds. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 31(1): 25–39.

Mirador, J. F. (2000) A move analysis of written feedback in higher education. RELC Journal 31(1): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820003100103

Nichol, D. (2010) From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35(5): 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559

Olsen, G. A. (1982) Beyond evaluation: The recorded response to essays. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 8: 121–123.

Oomen-Early, J., Bold, M., Wiginton, K. L., Gallien, T. L., and Anderson, N. (2008) Using asynchronous audio communication (ACC) in the online classroom: A comparative study. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 4: 267–276.

Parkes, M. and Fletcher, P. (2017) A longitudinal, quantitative study of student attitudes towards audio feedback for assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 42(7): 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1224810

Podis, L. A. and Podis, J. M. (1986) Improving our responses to student writing: A process-oriented approach. Rhetoric Review 5(1): 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198609359139

Prokofieva, A. and Hirschberg, J. (2014) Hedging and speaker commitment. Sematic Scholar. Retrieved on 6 June 2020 from https://tinyurl.com/54j32256.

Saldana, J. (2015) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Sommers, J. (1989) The effects of tape-recorded commentary on student revision: A case study. Journal of Teaching Writing 8: 49–75.

Sommers, J. (2012) Response rethought … again: Exploring recorded comments and the teacher-student bond. Journal of Writing Assessment 5(1). Retrieved on 6 June 2020 from http://www.journalofwritingassessment.org/article.php?article=59.

Sommers, N. (1982) Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication 33: 148–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/357622

Smith, S. (1997) The genre of the end comment: Conventions in teacher response to student writing. College Composition and Communication 48: 249–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/358669

Sperling, M. (1994) Constructing the perspective of teacher-as-reader: A framework for studying response to student writing. Research in the Teaching of English 28: 175–207.

Sprinkle, R. S. (2004) Written commentary: A systematic, theory-based approach to response. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 31(3): 273–286.

Stern, L. A. and Solomon, A. (2006) Effective faculty feedback: The road less travelled. Assessing Writing 11: 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2005.12.001

Straub, R. (1996) The concept of control in teacher response: Defining the varieties of ‘directive’ and ‘facilitative’ commentary. College Composition and Communication 47: 223–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/358794

Straub, R. (1997) Students’ reactions to teacher comments: An exploratory study. Research in the Teaching of English 31(1): 91–119.

Still, B. (2006) Talking to students: Embedded voice commenting as a tool for critiquing student writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 20: 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651906290270

Still, B. and Koerber, A. (2010) Listening to students: A usability evaluation of instructor commentary. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 24: 206–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651909353304

Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. and Feak, C. B. (2004) Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills (2nd Ed.) Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Treglia, M. O. (2008) Feedback on feedback: Exploring student responses to teachers’ written commentary. Journal of Basic Writing 27(1): 105–137. https://doi.org/10.37514/JBW-J.2008.27.1.06

Underwood, J. S. and Tregidgo, A. P. (2006) Improving student writing through effective feedback: Best practices and recommendations. Journal of Teaching Writing 22(2): 73–97.

Published

2021-08-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Denny, M. . (2021). A genre and discourse-based examination of audio commentary. Writing and Pedagogy, 12(2-3), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.17841