Infants’ communicative ecologies and language policies in two contemporary Spanish families

Authors

  • Nieves Galera Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • David Poveda Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.22361

Keywords:

Family Language Policy, Non-conventional Families, Infants, Voicing, Language Socialization, Spanish families

Abstract

This article examines linguistic socialisation and communicative practices in contemporary Spanish families during a child’s first two years of life. We focus on two families who worked towards additive bilingualism in their family communicative practices, with the goal of promoting the acquisition of more than one language early on in the children’s development. The two cases reflect non-conventional family projects, one family led by a single mother by choice and one by a lesbian couple. Our analysis focuses on three aspects: 1) the interactional and communicative ecologies that emerge as part of the linguistic decisions made by the mothers, focusing particularly on the maternal voicing of children’s ‘talk’; 2) how these ecologies develop over the first two years of children’s
lives; 3) how these interactional dynamics intertwine with the linguistic and parenting ideologies of mothers. Our analysis contributes to unpacking how Family Language Policy operates during the early stages of children’s communicative development and shows how, in fact, family language planning practices and parental projects intertwine.

Author Biographies

Nieves Galera, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Nieves Galera has recently completed her Doctorate in Psychology at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain. She has participated in various projects on language development and language socialisation across contexts as well as European projects on early childhood and digital media.

David Poveda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

David Poveda is a professor in the Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology of the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain. He uses qualitative and ethnographic research methods to study child and adolescent semiotic practices in a variety of socio-educational contexts.

References

Barron-Hauwaert, S. (2004) Language strategies for bilingual families: The one-parent-one-language approach. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Blommaert, J. (2018) Family Language Planning as Sociolinguistic Biopower. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies 216: 1–7. https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/sites/default/files/download/TPCS_216_Blommaert_2.pdf.

Copland, F. and Creese, A. (2015) Linguistic ethnography: Collecting, analysing and presenting data. London: Sage.

Cowan, K. (2014) Multimodal transcription of video: Examining interaction in early years classrooms. Classroom Discourse 5(1): 6–21. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2013.859846.

de León, L. (2005) La llegada del Alma: Lenguaje, infancia y socialización entre los Tzotziles de Zinacantán. México: CIESAS-INAH-CONACULTA.

de León, L. and García-Sánchez, I. (2021) Language socialization at the intersection of the local and the global: The contested trajectories of input and communicative competence. Annual Review of Linguistics 7: 421–448. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030538.

Erickson, F. (2015) Oral discourse as a semiotic ecology: The coconstruction and mutual influence of speaking, listening, and looking. In D. Tannen, H. Hamilton, and D. Schiffrin (eds) The handbook of discourse analysis 422–446. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.

Faircloth, C. (2014) Intensive parenting and the expansion of parenting. In E. Lee, J. Bristow, C. Faircloth, and J. Macvarish (eds) Parenting culture studies 25–50. New York: Palgrave.

Faircloth, C. and Murray, M. (2015) Parenting: Kinship, expertise and anxiety. Journal of Family Issues 36(9): 1115–1129. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14533546.

Faircloth, C. and Gürtin, Z. B. (2018) Fertile connections: Thinking across assisted reproductive technologies and parenting culture studies. Sociology 52(5): 983–1000. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517696219.

Gershon, I. (2010) Media ideologies: An introduction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20(2): 283–293. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01070.x.

Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Goodwin, M. H. (1990) He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Heller, M. (2010) The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 101–114. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951.

Hepburn, A. and Bolden, G. B. (2013) The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In T. Stivers and J. Sidnell (eds) The handbook of conversation analysis 57–76. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Jociles, M. I., Rivas, A. M., Moncó, B., Villami, F., and Díaz, P. (2008) Una reflexión crítica sobre la monoparentalidad: El caso de las madres solteras por elección. Portularia 8(1): 265–274. Retrieved from: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1610/161017350016.pdf.

King, K. A. and Fogle, L. W. (2006) Bilingual parenting as good parenting: Parents’ perspectives on Family Language Policy for additive bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9(6): 695–712. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2167/beb362.0.

King, K. A. and Fogle, L. W. (2017) Family Language Policy. In T. McCarty and S. May (eds) Language policy and political issues in education. Encyclopedia of language and education 315–26. Cham: Springer.

Kroskrity, P. V. (2010a) Language ideologies – Evolving perspectives. Society and Language Use 7(3): 192–205.

Kroskrity, P. V. (2010b) Language ideologies. In J. Jaspers, J.-O. Östman, and J. Verschueren (eds) Handbook of pragmatics 192–211. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.7.13kro.

Moustaoui, A. (2020) Making children multilingual: Language policy and parental agency in transnational and multilingual Moroccan families in Spain. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 41(1): 108–120. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1621879.

Ochs, E., Solomon, O., and Sterponi, L. (2005) Limitations and transformations of habitus in child-directed communication. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 547–583. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054406.

Ochs, E. and Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2015) How post-industrial families talk. Annual Review of Anthropology 44: 87–103. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014027.

Oswell, D. (2013) The agency of children: From family to global human rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Poveda, D., Jociles, M. I., and Rivas, A. (2014) Socialization into single-parent-by-choice family life. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(3): 319–344. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12085.

Poveda, D., Moscoso, M. F., and Jociles, M. I. (2018) From reflexivity to normalization: Parents and children confronting disclosure in families formed through assisted reproduction involving gamete donation. Human Organization 77(1): 10–21.

Pylypa, J. (2011) Socialization for intensive mothering in the single parent, transnationally adoptive family. Journal of the Motherhood Initiative 2(1): 213–225. Retrieved from: https://jarm.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jarm/article/view/32368.

Raithelhuber, E. (2016) Extending agency: The merit of relational approaches for childhood studies. In F. Esser, M. Baader, T. Betz, and B. Hungerland (eds) Reconceptualising agency and childhood 89–102. Oxford: Routledge.

Relaño-Pastor, A. M. (2018) Understanding bilingualism in La Mancha schools: Emotional and moral stancetaking in parental narratives. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 31(2): 578–604. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.17002.rel.

Rowe, M. and Snow, C. (2020) Analyzing input quality along three dimensions: Interactive, linguistic, and conceptual. Journal of Child Language 47(1): 5–21. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000655.

Schwartz, M. (2010) Family Language Policy: Core issues of an emerging field. Applied Linguistics Review 1(1): 171–192. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110222654.171.

Tannen, D. (2007) Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse. In D. Tannen, S. Kendall, and C. Gordon (eds) Family talk: Discourse and identity in four American families 49–69. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Tannen, D. (2010) Abduction and identity in family interaction: Ventriloquizing as indirectness. Journal of Pragmatics 42(2): 307–316. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.002.

Titlestad, A. and Robinson, K. (2019) Navigating parenthood as two women: The positive aspects and strengths of female same-sex parenting. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 15(2): 186–209. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2018.1423660.

Urciuoli, B. (2008) Skills and selves in the new workplace. American Ethnologist 35(2): 211–228. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00031.x.

Wright, L. (2020) Critical perspectives on language and kinship in multilingual families. London: Bloomsbury.

Published

2022-11-22

How to Cite

Galera, N., & Poveda, D. (2022). Infants’ communicative ecologies and language policies in two contemporary Spanish families. Sociolinguistic Studies, 16(2-3), 223–255. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.22361