Neo-Whorfianism goes to school
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.21050Keywords:
Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis, Linguistic AnthropologyAbstract
Linguistic relativity today: Language, mind, society, and the foundations of Linguistic Anthropology Marcel Danesi (2021) New York: Routledge. Pp. 172. ISBN 9780367431730 (hbk) ISBN 9780367431723 (pbk) ISBN 9781003001669 (eBook)
References
Berlin, B. and Kay, P. (1969) Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Boas, F. (1945) Race and democratic society. New York, NY: J. J. Augustin.
Lucy, J. A. (1997) Linguistic relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 291–311. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.291.
Lucy, J. A. (2001) Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. In N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes (eds) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 903–906. Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier.
Malinowski, B. (1922) Argonauts of the western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. New York, NY: Dutton.
Pae, H. K. (2020) Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture. Cham: Springer.
Whorf, B. L. (1940) Science and linguistics. MIT Technology Review 42: 229–249.
Whorf, B. L. (1956) In J. B. Carroll (ed.) Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
