Engaging Islam

Conversion or Crusade for Cusanus, Juan de Segovia, and Libellus to Leo X

Authors

  • Christopher M Bellitto Kean University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rst.27185

Keywords:

Islam, Cusanus, Juan de Segovia, Tommaso Giustiniani, Vincenzo Querini, Christian heresy

Abstract

What was the proper approach to countering Islam in the late Middle Ages? If Islam was seen as a Christian heresy in accordance with a common medieval interpretation, the church’s battle against Muslims was seen in ad intra terms. If Islam was treated as a separate religion, an ad extra approach followed. In either case, would unity and peace be best achieved via negotiations or force, particularly around 1453 when Constantinople fell to Muslim forces? We begin with Nicholas of Cusa and Juan de Segovia, then turn to Tommaso Giustiniani and Vincenzo Querini in their Libellus and Leonem decem (1513). They pushed the Medici pope to counter Islam using language of the just war tradition because they saw Muslims as apostate Christians. Considering these three approaches side by side, we witness Christian leaders wrestling with religious, political, and military considerations in deciding how best to counter the Islamic 
advance during a crucial half-century. 

References

Beall, Stephen, ed., and trans. 2016. Paolo Giustiniani and Pietro Querini. Libellus Addressed to Leo X, Supreme Pontiff. Milwaukee WI: Marquette University Press.

Bellitto, Christopher M. 2019. “Language, Leaders, and Locations of Church Reform in the Libellus ad Leonem Decimum.” In Nicholas of Cusa and Times of Transition, edited by Thomas M. Izbicki, Jason Aleksander, and Donald F. Duclow, 145–158. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004382411_011

Bowd, Stephen D. 2002. Reform Before the Reformation: Vincenzo Querini and the Religious Renaissance in Italy. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004475724

de Las Casas, Bartolomé. 1992. In Defense of the Indians, translated and edited by Stafford Poole. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.

Euler, Walter Andreas. 2019a. “Nicholas of Cusa and Martin Luther on Islam.” Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 26: 137–151. https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v26i1.11847

———. 2019b. “Una ecclesia in rituum varietate: Unity and Diversity of the Church according to Nicholas of Cusa.” In Nicholas of Cusa and Times of Transition, edited by Thomas M. Izbicki, Jason Aleksander, and Donald F. Duclow, 3–14. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004382411_002

Grellard, Christophe. 2020. La possibilità dell’errore. Pensare la tolleranza nel Medioevo. Rome: Aracne editrice.

Hollmann, Joshua. 2017. The Religious Concordance: Nicholas of Cusa and Christian-Muslim Dialogue. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004337466

Hopkins, Jasper, trans. 2001. Complete Philosophical and Theological Treatises of Nicholas of Cusa, 2 vols. Minneapolis, MN: The Arthur J. Banning Press.

Housley, Norman. 2017. “Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini, Nicholas of Cusa, and the Crusade: Conciliar, Imperial, and Papal Authority.” Church History 86: 643–667. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009640717001275

———. 2021. “The Papacy, Conciliarism and Crusade, 1449–1517.” The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 72: 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022046920000639

Mayer, Annemarie C. 2019. “Llull and Inter-Faith Dialogue.” In A Companion to Ramon Llull and Llullism, edited by Amy M. Austin and Mark D. Johnston, 146-175. Leiden: Brill.

Monfasani, John. 2019. “Cusanus, the Greeks, and Islam.” In Nicholas of Cusa and Times of Transition, edited by Thomas M. Izbicki, Jason Aleksander, and Donald F. Duclow, 96–112. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004379671_007

Ron, Nathan. 2019. “Erasmus’ Attitude toward Islam in Light of Nicholas of Cusa’s De pace fidei and Cribratio Alkorani.” Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 26: 113-136. https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v26i1.11846

Sackville, L. J. 2019. “The Church’s Institutional Response to Heresy in the 13th Century.” In A Companion to Heresy Inquisitions, edited by Donald S. Prudlo, 108–140. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004393875_006

Stone, Gregory. 2019. “Ramon Llull and Islam.” In A Companion to Ramon Llull and Llullism, edited by Amy M. Austin and Mark D. Johnston, 119–145 Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004379671_006

Tanner, Norman, gen. ed. 1990. Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, 2 vols. London/Washington, DC: Sheed & Ward/Georgetown University Press.

Tolan, John V. 2019. Faces of Muhammad: Western Perceptions of the Prophet from the Middle Ages to Today. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691186115

———. 2002. Saracens: Islam in the Medieval European Imagination. New York: Columbia University Press.

Valkenberg, Pim. 2014. “Una Religio in Rituum Varietate: Religious Pluralism, the Qur’an, and Nicholas of Cusa.” In Nicholas of Cusa and Islam: Polemic and Dialogue in the Late Middle Ages, edited by Ian Christopher Levy, Rita George-Tvrtkovic, and Donald F. Duclow, 30–48. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274761_005

Watanabe, Morimichi. 2014. “Cusanus, Islam, and Religious Tolerance.” In Nicholas of Cusa and Islam: Polemic and Dialogue in the Late Middle Ages, edited by Ian Christopher Levy, Rita George-Tvrtkovic, and Donald F. Duclow, 9–19, Leiden: Brill,

Wolf, Anne Marie. 2014. Juan de Segovia and the Fight for Peace: Christians and Muslims in the Fifteenth Century. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpj73vh

Published

2024-09-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bellitto, C. M. (2024). Engaging Islam: Conversion or Crusade for Cusanus, Juan de Segovia, and Libellus to Leo X. Religious Studies and Theology, 42(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1558/rst.27185