Denying a God of Mercy
Masculinity and Samson Agonistes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rst.24834Keywords:
Tragedy, John Milton, Samson Agonistes, toxic masculinity, Book of Judges, Chorus, violenceAbstract
This essay concerns itself with notions of masculinity in John Milton’s Samson Agonistes. Essentially, the essay argues that the violence in the play is a direct result of concepts of masculinity and the projection of those concepts onto God. The characters in the play repeatedly fail to recognize a God of compassion or mercy, preferring to remain within their notions of a voluntarist, vindictive, vengeful, and violent God. The argument considers the relationship of the play with the Book of Judges before shifting its focus to the Chorus, particularly their activity in framing and controlling the narrative. The play gives us various hints as to why we should pause before following their interpretations. The essay then examines a motif of hands/touch, which intersects with the motif in Paradise Lost, but to very different outcomes. The ending of the play is catastrophic and a direct result of an adherence to a particular view of
God and an inability to entertain other views.
References
Burbery, T. J. 2007. Milton The Dramatist. Medieval & Renaissance Literary Studies. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Carey, J. 2002. A work in praise of terrorism? September 11 and Samson Agonistes. Times Literary Supplement, Sept. 6, 16–19.
English Bible, The. King James Version. Volume One: The Old Testament. (2012). In The English Bible. King James Version. Volume One: The Old Testament, edited by Herbert Marks. A Norton Critical Edition. W.W. Norton & Company. (Originally published 1611)
English Bible, The. King James Version. 2012. In The English Bible. King James Version. Volume Two: The New Testament and the Apocrypha, edited by Gerald Hammond and Austin Busch. A Norton Critical Edition, W.W. Norton & Company. (Originally published 1611).
Gay, D. 2002. Endless Kingdom: Milton’s Scriptural Society. Newark: University of Delaware Press.
Hammond, P. 2014. Milton and the People. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682379.001.0001
Herman, P. C. 2005. Destabilizing Milton: “Paradise Lost” and the Poetics of Incertitude. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05304-6
Herman, P. C. 2018. “Milton among the terrorologists.” In Terrorism and Literature, by P. C. Herman, 486–504. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316987292.028
Kelley, M. R. and Wittreich, J. eds. 2002. Altering Eyes: New Perspectives on Samson Agonistes. Newark: University of Delaware Press.
Langer, A. 2020. “Temporal succession in Samson Agonistes.” Philosophy and Literature 44(2): 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2020.0023
———. 2021. “Samson’s Lockean person: Prefigurations of Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding in Milton’s Samson Agonistes.” The Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 21(3): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jem.2021.0016
Lash, A. P. 2021. “Milton and the tragic reader.” Ex-position 46: 83–104.
Lerner, R. 2020. “Civil death in early modern England.” Exemplaria 32(4): 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2020.1846347
Lodine-Chaffey, J. 2019. “John Milton’s Samson Agonistes: Deathly selfhood.” Parergon 36(1): 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1353/pgn.2019.0006
Milton, J. 1998 [1644]. “Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce.” In The Riverside Milton, edited by R. Flannagan, 926–976. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
———. 1998 [1674]. “Paradise Lost.” In The Riverside Milton, edited by R. Flannagan, 297–710. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
———. 1998 [1671]. “Samson Agonistes.” In The Riverside Milton, edited by R. Flannagan, 784–844. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Mohamed, F. G. 2011. Milton and the Post-Secular Present: Ethics, Politics, Terrorism. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
———. 2022. “On race and historicism: A polemic in three turns.” ELH 89(2): 377–405. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2022.0014
Mohamed, F. G. and P. Fadely, eds. 2017. Milton’s Modernities: Poetry, Philosophy, and History from the Seventeenth Century to the Present. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv47w7jw
Moore, G. 2019. “Resistable Samson: Milton, iconoclasm, and non-human agencies in seventeenth-century England.” English Literary Renaissance 49(3): 330–359. https://doi.org/10.1086/704508
Rudrum, A. 2002. “Milton scholarship and the Agon over Samson Agonistes.” The Huntington Library Quarterly 65(3/4): 465–488.
Shawcross, J. T. 2001. The Uncertain World of Samson Agonistes. Studies in Renaissance Literature. Martlesham: D.S. Brewer.
Wittreich, J. 1987. Feminist Milton. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
———. 2002. Shifting Contexts: Reinterpreting Samson Agonistes. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501743603
