Surveillance in New Religious Movements

Scientology as a Case Study

Authors

  • Susan Raine University of Alberta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.v28i1.63

Keywords:

surveillance, new religious movements, Scientology

Abstract

Contemporary discourse on surveillance tends not to account for the types of surveillance and security measures that both traditional and alternative religions adopt. Certainly, many religions have for centuries recorded, and thus, monitored, the lives of their followers. English parish records noting lives, baptisms, deaths and so forth is one such example originating in the sixteenth century. When one thinks of contemporary surveillance, however, more sophisticated strategies involving new technologies typically comes to mind. This article offers an examination of the numerous traditional and newer surveillance techniques of one particular new religious movement—Scientology. This movement employs a variety of stratagems in order to preserve a high level of secrecy regarding both its central doctrines and some of its activities. This article suggests that Scientology’s surveillance methods are driven not only by the group’s desire to protect its interests, but also by the quest for control (and hence, for power) that the group’s founder, L. Ron Hubbard, sought throughout his life and left as an institutional legacy after his death.

References

Atack, John. 1990. A Piece of Blue Sky: Scientology, Dianetics and L. Ron Hubbard Exposed. New York: Carol Publishing Group.

Bainbridge, W.S. and R. Stark. 1980. “Scientology: To be Perfectly Clear.” Sociological Analysis 41: 128–136. doi:10.2307/3709904

Behar, Richard. 1991. “The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power.” Time May 6, 52–60.

Beit-Hallahmi, Benjamin. 2003. “Scientology: Religion or Racket?” Marburg Journal of Religion 8(1).

http://www.uni-marburg.de/religionwissenschaft/journal/mjr/kent3.html accessed September 11, 2003

Bromley, David G., and Mitchell Bracey Jr. 1998. “The Church of Scientology: A Quasi Religion.” In Sects, Cults and Spiritual Communities: A Sociological Analysis, edited by William W. Zellner and Marc Petrowsky, 141–156. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Brown, Janelle. 1998. “A Web of Their Own.” http://archive.salon.com/21st/feature/1998/07/15feature.html, accessed November 10, 2003.

Burroughs, William. 1993. What is Scientology? Los Angeles, CA: Bridge Publications.

———. 1991. Ali’s Smile: Naked Scientology. Bonn: Expanded Mind Editions. Church of Scientology International.

Claridge, Thomas. “Church of Scientology Found Guilty.” The Globe and Mail [Toronto] 27 June 1992. A17.

Cooper, Paulette. 1971. The Scandal of Scientology. New York: Tower Publications.

Corydon, Bent. 1996. L. Ron Hubbard, Messiah or Madman? New York: Barricade Books.

Darroch, Wendy. “Church ‘Plants’ Stole Files Trial Told.” Toronto Star 30 April 1992. A23.

Dunphy, Bill. “Secret Files Reported.” Toronto Sun 30 April 1992.

Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage

Freedom. 2001. “Is Bad Research and Prejudice ‘Academic Freedom’?” Church of Scientology International. 4(1): 6.

———.1998. “Sowing the Seeds of Intolerance.” Church of Scientology International. 2(1): 8–9.

Haggerty, Kevin D. and Richard V. Ericson. 2000. “The Surveillant Assemblage.” British Journal of Sociology. 51(4): 605–622. doi:10.1080/00071310020015280

Harper’s Magazine. 2003. “Stayin’ Alive.” November.

Hubbard, L. Ron. 1982. “The Cause of Crime.” Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin. (6 May)

———. 1977. “Classified Confessional.” Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin. (3 March).

———. 1976. Modern Management Technology Defined. Los Angeles: Publications Organization.

———. 1975. Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary. Los Angeles, CA: Publications Organization.

———. 1970b. Introduction to Scientology Ethics. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: The American St. Hill Organization.

———. 1970a. “Statistics, Management By.” HCO Policy Letter, in The Organization Executive Course: An Encyclopaedia of Scientology Policy. Executive Division 7. (1976). 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Publications Organization.

———. 1968d. “Cancellation of Fair Game.” HCO Policy Letter, in The Organization Executive Course: An Encyclopaedia of Scientology Policy. HCO Division 1. (1976). 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Publications Organization.

———. 1968c. “Sea Org Internes.” HCO Policy Letter, in The Organization Executive Course: An Encyclopaedia of Scientology Policy. HCO Division 1. (1976). 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Publications Organization.

———. 1968b. “Security Checks Abolished.” HCO Policy Letter, in The Organization Executive Course: An Encyclopaedia of Scientology Policy. HCO Division 1. (1976). 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Publications Organization.

———. 1968a. “Organization – The Flaw.” HCO Policy Letter, in Organization Executive Course: An Encyclopaedia of Scientology Policy. HCO Division 1. 1976. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Publications Organization.

———. 1967. “Penalties for Lower Conditions.” Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter. 18 October.

———. 1965c. “Suppressive Persons, Main Characteristics of.” HCO Policy Letter, in The Organization Executive Course: An Encyclopaedia of Scientology Policy. HCO Division 1. 1976. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Publications Organization.

———. 1965b. “Staff Member Reports.” HCO Policy Letter, in Organization Executive Course: An Encyclopaedia of Scientology Policy. HCO Division 1. (1976). 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Publications Organization.

———. 1965a. “Statistics for Divisions.” HCO Policy Letter, in Organization Executive Course: An Encyclopaedia of Scientology Policy. HCO Division 1. (1976). 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Publications Organization.

———. 1962. “Religion.” HCO Policy Letter, in The Organization Executive Course: An Encyclopaedia of Scientology Policy. Executive Division 7. (1976). 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Publications Organization.

———. 1961b. “Sec Check Whole Track.” HCO Bulletin, in The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology. Volume IV. (1976). Los Angeles, CA: The American Saint Hill Organization.

———. 1961a. “The Only Valid Security Check.” HCO Bulletin, in The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology. Volume IV. (1976). Los Angeles, CA: The American Saint Hill Organization.

———. 1960. “Security Checks.” HCO Bulletin, in The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology. Volume IV. (1976). Los Angeles, CA: The American Saint Hill Organization.

Jacobsen, Jeff. 2000. “The Eyes of Scientology.” http://www.lisamcpherson.org/cams/jeff_cameras.htm?FACTNet, accessed 10 September, 2008.

Kent, Stephen A. 2001. “Brainwashing programs in The Family/Children of God and Scientology.” In Misunderstanding Cults, edited by Benjamin Zablocki and Thomas Robbins, 349–378. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

———. 2000. Brainwashing in Scientology’s Rehabilitation Project Force (RPF). Hamburg: Behorde fur Inneres—Arbeitsgruppe Scientology.

———. 1999c. “Scientology—Is this a Religion?” Marburg Journal of Religion. 4(1): 1-28. http://www.uni-marburg.de/religionwissenschaft/journal/mjr/kent3.html, accessed September 11, 2003.

———. 1999b. “The Creation of ‘Religious’ Scientology.” Religious Studies and Theology. 18(2): 97–127.

———. 1999a. “The Globalization of Scientology: Influence, Control and Opposition in Transnational Markets.” Religion. 29: 147–169.

Krakauer, Jon. (2003). Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith. New York: Doubleday.

Kumar, J.P. 1997. “Fair Game: Leveling the Playing Field in Scientology Litigation.” The Review of Litigation. 16(3): 747–772.

Lane, Jodi and Stephen Kent. 2008. “Politiques de Rage et Narcissisme Malin.” Criminologie. 41(2): 117–155. (English version available at http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/skent/Linkedfiles/LaneKent/HubbardsNarcissism_EN_December08-2008.pdf)

Leiby, Richard. 1981. “Sect Courses Resemble Science Fiction.” Clearwater Sun [Florida]. August 30: 1A, 2A.

Lippard, Jim and Jeff Jacobsen. 1995. “Scientology v. the Internet: Free Speech and Copyright Infringement on the Information Super-Highway.” Skeptic 3(3): 35–41.

Lyon, David. 2007. Surveillance Studies: An Overview. Cambridge: Polity Press.

———. 2003. Surveillance After September 11. Cambridge: Polity Press.

———. 2001. Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. Buckingham: Open University Press.

———. 1994. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Mann, Jim. “Five Scientology Leaders Receive Prison Sentences.” Los Angeles Times 7 December 1979.

Marks, Peter. 2005. “Imagining Surveillance: Utopian Visions and Surveillance Studies.” Surveillance and Society. 3(2/3): 222–239.

Marlowe, Steve. 2002. “What’s New About the ‘New Surveillance’? Classifying for Change and Continuity.” Surveillance & Society. 1(1): 9–29.

———. 1995. “Electric Eye in the Sky: Some Reflections on the New Surveillance and Popular Culture” in Cultural Criminology, edited by Jeff Ferrell and Clinton R. Saunders, 106–141. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

———. 1982. “Staff Alert” Sea Organization Religious Technology Center Conditions Order 5. (November 25). 2.

Marx, Gary T. 1988. Undercover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Melton, Gordon. 2000. The Church of Scientology. Salt Lake City, UT: Signature Books.

Miller, Russell. 1987. Bare-Faced Messiah: The True Story of L. Ron Hubbard. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

Operation Clambake. “Scientology censor software cracked!” http://www.xenu.net/archive/events.censorship/wordlist.html, accessed November 10, 2003.

Orwell, George. 1949. Nineteen Eighty-Four. Reprint. 2000 by London: Penguin.

Passas, Nikos and Castillo, Manuel, Escamilla. 1992. “Scientology and its ‘Clear’ Business.” Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 10(1): 103–116. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370100110

Pignotti, Monica. 1989. “My Nine Lives in Scientology.” http://www-2.cscmu.edu/~dst/Library/Shelf/pignotti/, accessed November 10, 2003.

“Police Work for Scientology.” St. Petersburg Times 22 March 2001. Reitman, Janet. 2006. “Inside Scientology.” http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/9363363/inside_scientology/3, accessed December 29, 2008.

Ronningstam, Elsa F. 2005. Identifying and Understanding the Narcissistic Personality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ross, Rick. 1998. “Another View of Scientology’s ‘ScienoSitter’.” http://www.rickross.com/reference/scientology/Scien46.html, accessed Retrieved September 9, 2003.

Sherman, Chris. 2002. “Google Airs Scientology Infringement Demand.” http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/print.php/3100_9321, accessed October 9, 2003.

Solomon, Dorothy Allred. (2003). Predators, Prey, and Other Kinfolk: Growing Up in Polygamy. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

St. Petersburg Times. 2001. “Police Work for Scientology.” 22 March.

Straus, Roger. 1986. “Scientology ‘Ethics’: Deviance, Identity and Social Control in a Cult-Like Social World.” Symbolic Interaction. 9(1): 67–82. doi:10.1525/si.1986.9.1.67

Thomas, Keith. 1971. Religion and the Decline of Magic. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Touretzky, David and Peter Alexander. 2003. “A Church’s Lethal Contract.” Razor. 4(1): 88–95.

United States District Court for the District of Columbia. 1995. “Religious Technology Centre vs. Arnaldo Pagliarini Lerma et al. United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia.” Court Case C.A. No. 95-1107-A. “Plaintiff’s Exhibits, Vol. 2. Nos. 44a-dd”

———. 1980. “United States of America v. Jane Kember, Morris Budlong a/k/a Mo Budlong. Sentencing Memorandum of the United States of America.” Criminal No. 78–401 (2) & (3). (December 16): 36pp.

———. 1979. “United States of America vs. Mary Sue Hubbard et. al. Stipulation of Evidence.” Criminal No. 78–401, October 25: 283pp.

Urban, Hugh. 2006. “Fair Game: Secrecy, Security, and the Church of Scientology in Cold War America.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion. 74(2): 356–389. doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfj084

Wallis, Roy. 1973 “Religious Sects and the Fear of Publicity.” New Society. 7 June: 52–54.

———. 1977. The Road to Total Freedom: A Sociological Analysis of Scientology. New York: Columbia University Press.

Whitehead, Harriet. 1987. Renunciation and Reformulation: A Study of Conversion in an American Sect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Young, Robert Vaughn. 1997b. “On Lack of Privacy.” http/wwwfactnet.org/Scientology/Robert_Vaughn_Young/19970827_The_Scn_1984_Par, accessed 20 September, 2003

———.1997a. “Re: The Scn/1984 Parallel – Doublethink (RVY).” http://www.holysmoke.org/rvy/49.htm, accessed 20 September, 2003.

Published

2009-07-17

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Raine, S. (2009). Surveillance in New Religious Movements: Scientology as a Case Study. Religious Studies and Theology, 28(1), 63-94. https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.v28i1.63