The Augustinian Perspective on the Transmission of Original Sin and Assisted Reproductive Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.31054Keywords:
Augustine of Hippo, original sin, assisted reproductive technologies, sexuality, Christian theologyAbstract
St. Augustine of Hippo believed that original sin is transmitted through concupiscent intercourse. The new assisted reproductive
technologies (ARTs) now allow humans to create children without any intercourse, thus opening the theological possibility for circumventing the transmission of original sin, if Augustine was correct in his theory. This article will first examine Augustine’s speculative theology of prelapsarian sexual intercourse and procreation, followed by his view on the postlapsarian transmission of original sin. Second, I will describe assisted reproductive technologies, with a focus on in-vitro fertilization. I will then, third, place ARTs within an Augustinian theology of the transmission of original sin, underscoring the implications for a free will, Protestant Christian anthropology, Christology, soteriology, and missiology. I will conclude the article by considering the role of historical theology for modern scientific advancements such as ARTs.
References
Asch, Adrienne and Rebecca Marmor. 2008. “Assisted Reproduction.” In From Birth to Death and Bench to Clinic: The Hastings Center Bioethics Briefing Book for Journalists, Policymakers, and Campaigns, edited by Mary Crowley, 5–10. Garrison, NY: Hastings Center.
Augustine. 1996a. Against Julian. In Saint Augustine on Marriage and Sexuality, edited by Elizabeth Clark. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
———. 1996b. Epistle 6. In Saint Augustine on Marriage and Sexuality, edited by Elizabeth Clark. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
———. 1996c. On the Good of Marriage. In Saint Augustine on Marriage and Sexuality. Edited by Elizabeth Clark. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
———. 1996d. To Turbantius. In Saint Augustine on Marriage and Sexuality. Edited by Elizabeth Clark. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
Augustine. 1972. City of God. Translated by Henry Bettenson. London: Penguin.
Berkhoff, Louis. 1996. Systematic Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Cahill, Lisa Sowle. 2004. Bioethics and the Common Good. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press. https://doi.org/10.5840/pmlt2004352
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 1987. Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation: Replies to Certain Questions of the Day: Donum vitae. Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference.
Denlinger, Aaron. 2009. “Calvin’s Understanding of Adam’s Relationship to His Posterity: Recent Assertions of the Reformer’s ‘Federalism’ Evaluated.” Calvin Theological Journal 44: 226–250.
Fisher, George Park. 1868. “The Augustinian and the Federal Theories of Original Sin Compared.” The New Englander 27: 468–516.
Fletcher, Joseph. 1966. Morals and Medicine. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.
Gallagher, James. 2013. “UK Government Backs Three-person IVF.” BBC News. June 27. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-23079276
Gerrish, B. A. 2006. “The Place of Calvin in Christian Theology.” In Cambridge Companions to John Calvin, edited by Donald K. McKim, 289–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Griniezakis, Makarios and Nathaniel Symeonide. 2009. “Twin Conception (Didimogenesis) and Ensoulment.” Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 15(1): 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1558/hrge.v15i1.35
Honey, Colin. 1984. “The Ethics of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.” Modern Christian 26: 1-12.
Hunter, David G. 1997. Marriage and Virginity (Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century). Hyde Park, NY: New City.
Kauffman, H. 2009. “Designer Babies Ethical?” CBS News. March 3. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/designer-babies-ethical/
Keenan, James F. 2013. “Vatican II and Theological Ethics.” Theological Studies 74: 162–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056391307400109
Meeks, Wayne A. 1993. The Origins of Christian Morality. New Haven, CT: Yale.
Parens, Eric and A. Asch. 1999. “The Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Genetic Testing: Reflections And Recommendations.” Special Supplement. Hastings Center Report 29: S1-S22. https://doi.org/10.2307/3527746
Qian, N. 2008. “Missing Women and the Price of Tea in China: The Effect of Sex-Specific Earnings on Sex Imbalance.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(3): 1251-1285. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.1251
Richie, C. 2015. “Feminist Bioethics, Pornography, and the Reproductive Technologies Business.” International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bio-ethics Blog. October 5. http://www.ijfab.org/blog/2015/10/feminist-bio-ethics-pornography-and-the-reproductive-technologies-business/
———. 2014. “The Augustinian Legacy of the Procreative Marriage: Contemporary Implications and Alternatives.” Feminist Theology 23(1): 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0966735014542376
———. 2012a. “A Christian Understanding of In-Vitro Fertilization.” Ministry International Journal for Pastors 8(7): 14-17.
———. 2012b. “Applying Catholic Responsibility to In-Vitro Fertilization: Obligations to the Spouse, the Body, and the Common Good.” Christian Bioethics 18(3): 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbs025
Ryan, Maura. 2001. Ethics and Economics of Assisted Reproduction: The Cost of Longing. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Sidhu, J. 2012. “How To Buy a Daughter.” Slate. September 14. http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2012/09/sex_selection_in_babies_through_pgd_americans_are_paying_to_have_daughters_rather_than_sons_.html
Trost, L.W. and Brannigan, R.E., 2012. “Oncofertility and the Male Cancer Patient.” Current Treatment Options in Oncology 13(2): 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-012-0191-7
