A Logico-Indigenous Critique of Atalia Omer’s Critical Caretaker Binary

Authors

  • Adam Stewart Crandall University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.34745

Keywords:

Atalia Omer, Boolean algebra, Critics Not Caretakers, Indian residential schools, Russell T. McCutcheon

Abstract

In this article I do three things. First, I describe the logical coherence of the critic caretaker binary articulated by Russell T. McCutcheon, which argues that, in order to be successful at their work, it is necessary for scholars of religion to be critics, not caretakers, of the religions they study. Second, I describe the logical incoherence of the more recent critical caretaker binary proposed by Atalia Omer, which argues that, when they encounter conflict or social injustice, scholars of religion can successfully operate in a third mode of practice that combines those of critic and caretaker. Finally, using the example of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, I very briefly illustrate how the critical caretaker binary is not only illogical, but also ethically negligent, as its application among Indigenous subjects does violence to these individuals in ways that could be avoided by adhering to the critic caretaker binary.

References

Abler, Thomas S. 2006. “A Mi’kmaq Missionary among the Mohawks: Silas T. Rand and His Attitudes towards Race and ‘Progress.’” In With Good Intentions: Euro-Canadian and Aboriginal Relations in Colonial Canada, edited by Celia Haig-Brown and David A. Nock, 72–86. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

Aboriginal Healing Foundation. 2006. Promising Healing Practices in Aboriginal Communities. Vol. 3 of Final Report of the Aboriginal Healing Foundation. Ottawa: Aboriginal Healing Foundation.

Dewar, Jonathan, Rosalie Favell, and Adam Stewart. 2015. Celebrating Resilience. Exhibited at the Closing Ceremonies of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, May 31–June 3. Aboriginal Heritage Component, Museums Assistance Program, Department of Canadian Heritage, Government of Canada.

Gaertner, David. 2016. “ ‘Aboriginal Principles of Witnessing’ and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.” In Arts of Engagement: Taking Aesthetic Action In and Beyond the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, edited by Dylan Robinson and Keavy Martin, 135–56. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

Gaertner, David. 2014. “20 October 2008: Translating Reconciliation.” In Translation Effects: The Shaping of Modern Canadian Culture, edited by Kathy Mezei, Sherry Simon, and Luise von Ftotow, 444–458. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Griffiths, Paul J. 1998. “Response: Some Conclusions about Critical Intelligence: A Response to Russell T. McCutcheon.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 66 (4): 893–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/66.4.893

Health Canada. 2016. “Indian Residential Schools Resolution Health Support Program.” http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fniah-spnia/services/indiresident/irspi-eng.php

Korteweg, Lisa, and Emily Root. 2016. “Witnessing Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug’s Strength and Struggle: The Affective Education of Reconciliation in Environmental Education.” Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 21: 178–197.

Mack, Burton. 2001. “Caretakers and Critics: On the Social Role of Scholars Who Study Religion.” Council of Societies for the Study of Religion Bulletin 30: 32–38.

Malacrida, Claudia. 2015. A Special Hell: Institutional Life in Alberta’s Eugenic Years. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

McCutcheon, Russell T. 2012. “A Direct Question Deserves a Direct Answer: A Response to Atalia Omer’s ‘Can a Critic Be a Caretaker Too?’” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 80 (4): 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfs071

———. 2001. Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion. Albany: State University of New York Press.

———. 1998. “Talking Past Each Other—Public Intellectuals Revisited: Rejoinder to Paul J. Griffiths and June O’Connor.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 66 (4): 911–917. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/66.4.911

———. 1997a. “A Default of Critical Intelligence? The Scholar of Religion as Public Intellectual.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 65 (2): 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/65.2.443

———. 1997b. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse of Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. New York: Oxford University Press.

Miller, J.R. 1996. Shingwauk’s Vision: A History of Native Residential Schools. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Milloy, John S. 2017. A National Crime: The Canadian Government and the Residential School System. Second edition. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

Mosby, Ian. 2013. “Administering Colonial Science: Nutrition Research and Human Biomedical Experimentation in Aboriginal Communities and Residential Schools, 1942–1952.” Histoire Sociale/Social History 46(91): 145–172.

Niezen, Ronald. 2013. Truth and Indignation: Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Indian Residential Schools. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

O’Connor, June. 1998. “Response: The Scholar of Religion as Public Intellectual: Expanding Critical Intelligence.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 66(4): 897–910. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/66.4.897

Omer, Atalia. 2013a. “In the Critic vs. Caretaker Dichotomy A Magic Dwells: Parroting McCutcheon, Policing ‘Religion’ (A Rejoinder to Merinda Simmons).” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 25(4–5): 382–402.

———. 2013b. When Peace Is Not Enough: How the Israeli Peace Camp Thinks about Religion, Nationalism, and Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

———. 2012. “On Professor McCutcheon’s (Un)critical Caretaking.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 80(4): 1083–1097. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfs079

———. 2011. “Can a Critic Be a Caretaker too? Religion, Conflict, and Conflict Transformation.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 79(2): 459–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfq076

Rand, Silas Tertius. 1894. Legends of the Micmacs. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.

Regan, Paulette. 2010. Unsettling the Settler Within: Indian Residential Schools, Truth Telling, and Reconciliation in Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

———. 2007. “An Apology Feast in Hazelton: Indian Residential Schools, Reconciliation, and Making Space for Indigenous Legal Traditions.” In Indigenous Legal Traditions, edited by the Law Commission of Canada, 40–76. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

Simmons, K. Merinda. 2013a. “Protective Parroting: A Rejoinder to Atalia Omer.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 25(4–5): 403–407. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341302

———. 2013b. “Regulating Identities: The Silences of Critical Caretaking.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 25 (4–5): 362–81.

Slater, Michael R. 2007. “Can One Be a Critical Caretaker?” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 19 (3–4): 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006807X243098

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. 2015a. Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future: Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Winnipeg: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.

———. 2015b. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to Action. Winnipeg: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.

United Nations. 2008. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. New York: United Nations.

Widdowson, Frances, and Albert Howard. 2008. Disrobing the Aboriginal Industry: The Deception Behind Indigenous Cultural Preservation. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Wise, Todd. 2000. “Speaking Through Others: Black Elk Speaks as Testimonial Literature.” In The Black Elk Reader, edited by Clyde Holler, 19–39. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

Published

2018-06-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Stewart, A. (2018). A Logico-Indigenous Critique of Atalia Omer’s Critical Caretaker Binary. Religious Studies and Theology, 37(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.34745