Archetypal Hermeneutics as an Approach to the Psychology of Religion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.v31i2.147Keywords:
archetype, background understanding, C. G. Jung, healing serpent, hermeneutics, religious symbolismAbstract
This article develops and illustrates a hermeneutic approach to the psychology of religion derived from C. G. Jung’s psychological theory of archetypes. The point of departure is the “dis-integrative dynamics” of the failed historical collaboration between Jung and Catholic theologian Victor White. The Jung-White impasse motivates a distinction between the conceptual analysis of theological constructs and a non-conceptual hermeneutics of religious symbols. The latter form of inquiry is based on a reworking of Jung’s archetypal approach in terms of the hermeneutic notion of background understanding. This approach is then illustrated through a
hermeneutic amplification of the symbolic motif of the healing serpent and its application to the theological disagreement between Jung and White. It is concluded that an archetypal hermeneutic approach is uniquely valuable for an understanding of perennial aspects of the lived experience of religious meaning.
References
Baydala, A., and W. E. Smythe. 2012 Hermeneutics of continuity: Theorizing psychological understandings of ancient literature. Theory & Psychology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354312446648
Cunningham, A. 2007 “Victor White, a memoir.” In The Jung-White Letters, edited by A. C. Lammers and A. Cunningham, 307–334. London: Routledge.
Dourley, J. P. 2007 “The Jung-White Dialogue and Why It Couldn’t Work and Won’t Go Away.” Journal of Analytical Psychology 52: 275–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2007.00663.x
Dreyfus, H. L. 1991 Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Eliade, M. 1969 [1954]. Yoga: Immortality and Freedom. Translated by W. R. Trask. 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[1951] Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy. Translated by W. R. Trask. 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Friedlander, W. J. 1992 The Golden Wand of Medicine: A History of the Caduceus Symbol in Medicine. New York: Greenwood.
Goertzen, J. R. and W. E. Smythe, ed. 2010 Theorizing Pluralism. Special issue of New Ideas in Psychology 28(2): 199–262.
Grimm, J. P., K. L. Barnett, R. L. Bassett, S. M. Pearson, A. Cornell, S. Morton, K. Scott and P. Stevenson. 2012 “Revisiting the Issue of Influential Sources in the Integration of Psychology and Theology: More than a Decade Summary.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 40: 5–15.
Hart, G. D. 2000 Asclepius the God of Medicine. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
Hill, P. C. 2012 “Revisiting a Field of Dreams: Looking Back with Appreciation and Forward with Anticipation.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 40: 51–54.
Jung, C. G. 1966a [1935] “The Relations between the Ego and the Unconscious.” In Two Essays on Analytical Psychology: Vol. 7, The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, edited by H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, and W. McGuire. Translated by R. F. C. Hull. 2nd edition, 121–241. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
b [1916] “The Structure of the Unconscious.” In Two Essays on Analytical Psychology: Vol. 7, The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, edited by H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, and W. McGuire. Translated by R. F. C. Hull. 2nd edition, 269–304. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
a [1959] Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self: Vol. 9ii, The Collected Works of C. G Jung, edited by H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, and W. McGuire. Translated by R. F. C. Hull. 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
b [1952] “Answer to Job.” In Psychology and religion: West and east: Vol. 11. The collected works of C. G. Jung, edited by H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, and W. McGuire. Translated by R. F. C. Hull. 2nd edition , 355–470. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
c [1947] “On the Nature of the Psyche.” In The structure and dynamics of the psyche: Vol. 8. The collected works of C. G. Jung, edited by H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, and W. McGuire. Translated by R. F. C. Hull. 2nd edition, 159–234. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
d [1940] “The Psychological Aspects of the Kore.” In The archetypes and the collective unconscious: Vol. 9i. The collected works of C. G. Jung, edited by H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, and W. McGuire. Translated by R. F. C. Hull. 2nd edition 182–203. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[1933] The Psychology of Kundalini Yoga, edited by S. Shamdasani. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lammers, A. C. 1994 In God’s Shadow: The Collaboration of Victor White and C. G. Jung. New York: Paulist Press.
“Jung and White and the God of Terrible Double Aspect.” Journal of Analytical Psychology 52: 253–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2007.00662.x
Lammers, A. C. and A. Cunningham, ed. 2007 The Jung-White Letters. London: Routledge.
Nelson, J. M. and B. D. Slife. 2006 “Philosophical Issues in Psychology and Religion: An Introduction.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 34: 191–192.
Richardson, F. C. 2006 “Psychology and Religion: Hermeneutic Reflections.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 34: 232–245.
Searle, J. R. 1992 The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Consciousness and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shults, F. L. 2012 “Dis-Integrating Psychology and Theology.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 40: 21–25.
Smythe, W. E. and A. Baydala. 2012 “The Hermeneutic Background of C. G. Jung.” Journal of Analytical Psychology 57: 57–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2011.01951.x
Smythe, W. E. and G. C. Chan. 2009 “Jungian Archetypes and Evolutionary Psychology.” In Varieties of Theoretical Psychology: International Philosophical and Practical Concerns, edited by T. Teo, P. Stenner, A. Rutherford, E. Park and C. Baerveldt, 289–298. Concord, Canada: Captus Press.
Stein, M. 1985 Jung’s Treatment of Christianity: The Psychotherapy of a Religious Tradition. Wilmette, IL: Chiron Publications.
“Of Texts and Contexts: Reflections upon the Publication of The Jung-White Letters.” Journal of Analytical Psychology 52: 297–319.
Taylor, C. H. 1995 Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Wertz, F. J. 1999 “Multiple Methods in Psychology: Epistemological Grounding and the Possibility of Unity.” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 19: 131–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0091173
White, V. 2007 [1955] “Jung on Job.” In The Jung-White Letters, edited by A. C. Lammers and A. Cunningham, 349–362. London: Routledge.
