Being a DJ in a time of zero social huddling

Tales from a locked-down India


  • Pradip Sarkar RMIT University



livestreaming, social media, affordances, DJ culture, COVID-19, India


The COVID-19 pandemic has caused widespread disruptions in music industries globally, resulting in rapid cancellations of music festivals, concerts and club nights, and closure of international borders. The consequences of this pandemic have been especially dire for musicians, DJs and event promoters whose livelihoods and financial viability were tied largely to live performances. Within the independent music scenes in India, artists and event organizers rushed to social media and livestreaming platforms in their attempts to salvage brand visibility and explore monetization opportunities as drastic impositions of nationwide lockdowns came into effect. In a densely populated developing country rife with anxieties over exponential rates of COVID-19 infections, independent musicians in India have sought creative approaches to maintain visibility through digital platforms. Drawing on methods influenced by online ethnography, this article presents a discussion of how four professional Indian DJs explore and interrogate the affordances of various social media and livestreaming platforms in their efforts to remain artistically visible in the absence of state-initiated financial support and socially huddled dance-floors. The article offers insights into the triumphs, and trials and tribulations, experienced by independent musicians as they explore the material affordances of digital platforms at this critical moment in history.

Author Biography

Pradip Sarkar, RMIT University

Pradip K. Sarkar is a PhD candidate at the School of Media and Communications, RMIT University. His research investigates the digital media ecosystems surrounding the practices of independent musicians in India.


Biehl, B. 2019. ‘“In the Mix”: Relational Leadership Explored through an Analysis of Techno DJs and Dancers’. Leadership 15/3: 339–59.

Davis, S. 2012. ‘Liveness, Mediation and Immediacy: Innovative Technology Use in Process and Performance’. Research in Drama Education 17/4: 501–516.

Duffy, B. E., U. Pruchniewska and L. Scolere. 2017. ‘Platform-Specific Self-Branding: Imagined Affordances of the Social Media Ecology’. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society, 1–9. Toronto, ON: ACM.

Ferreira, P. P. 2008. ‘When Sound Meets Movement: Performance in Electronic Dance Music’. Leonardo Music Journal 18: 17–20.

Golbeck, J. 2019. ‘Dogs Good, Trump Bad: The Impact of Social Media Content on Sense of Well-Being’. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, 125–29. Boston, MA: Association for Computing Machinery.

Golechha, M. 2020. ‘COVID-19, India, Lockdown and Psychosocial Challenges: What Next?’ International Journal of Social Psychiatry 66/8: 830–32.

Hine, C. 2000. Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.

Jeffrey, R., and A. Doron. 2013. Great Indian Phone Book. London: C. Hurst & Co.

Jha, A., and J. Mullick. 2020. ‘How the World’s Strictest Lockdown Affected India’. Hindusthan Times, 22 June. New Delhi.

Lancet. 2020. ‘India under COVID-19 Lockdown’. The Lancet (London) 395(10233): 1315.

Lanham, R. A. 2006. The Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lobato, R., and J. Meese. 2014. ‘Kittens All the Way Down: Cute in Context’. M/C Journal 17/2.

Maddox, J. 2020. ‘The Secret Life of Pet Instagram Accounts: Joy, Resistance, and Commodification in the Internet’s Cute Economy’. New Media & Society.

Mallya, H. 2015. ‘With 3rd Largest Smartphone Market in the World, India to Reach 314 Million Mobile Internet Users by 2017’. Your Story, 21 July. Online at

Oaten, J., and S. Patidar. 2020. ‘India’s Coronavirus Lockdown: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of Narendra Modi’s COVID-19 Measures’. ABC News, 17 May. Online at (accessed 14 March 2021).

Postill, J. 2017. ‘Remote Ethnography: Studying Culture from Afar’. In The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography, ed. L. Hjorth, H. Horst, A. Galloway and G. Bell, 61–69. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Postill, J., and S. Pink. 2012. ‘Social Media Ethnography: The Digital Researcher in a Messy Web’. Media International Australia 145/1: 123–34.

Rietveld, H. C. 2013. ‘Journey to the Light? Immersion, Spectacle and Mediation’. In DJ Culture in the Mix: Power, Technology, and Social Change in Electronic Dance Music, ed. B. A. Attias, A. Gavanas and H. C. Tietveld, 79–102. New York: Bloomsbury.

Skjuve, M., and P. B. Brandtzaeg. 2019. ‘Facebook Live: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Explore Individual Live Streaming Practices and Motivations on Facebook’. Interacting with Computers 31/3: 589–602.

Taylor, I. A., S. Raine and C. Hamilton. 2020. ‘COVID-19 and the UK Live Music Industry: A Crisis of Spatial Materiality’. Journal of Media Art Study and Theory 1/2: 219–41.

Vandemast-Bell, P. 2013. ‘Rethinking Live Electronic Music: A DJ Perspective’. Contemporary Music Review 32/2-3: 239–48.

Vandenberg, F., M. Berghman and J. Schaap. 2020. ‘The “Lonely Raver”: Music Livestreams during COVID-19 as a Hotline to Collective Consciousness?’ European Societies 23: 1–12.

Watson, A., D. Lupton and M. Michael. 2020. ‘Enacting Intimacy and Sociality at a Distance in the COVID-19 Crisis: The Sociomaterialities of Home-based Communication Technologies’. Media International Australia.



How to Cite

Sarkar, P. (2021). Being a DJ in a time of zero social huddling: Tales from a locked-down India. Perfect Beat, 21(1), 47–55.