Introduction
Focusing on classroom interaction in EMI contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jmtp.25511Keywords:
Guest EditorialReferences
An, J. and Thomas, N. (2021). Students’ beliefs about the role of interaction for science learning and language learning in EMI science classes: Evidence from high schools in China. Linguistics and Education, 65, 100972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100972
British Council. (2021). The changing landscape of English-taught programmes. British Council.
Doiz, A. and Lasagabaster, D. (2021). Language use in English-medium instruction at university: International perspectives on teacher practice. Routledge.
Doiz, A. and Lasagabaster, D. (2022). Looking into English-medium instruction teachers’ metadiscourse: An ELF perspective. System, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102730
Evans, S. and Morrison, B. (2011). The student experience in English-medium higher education in Hong Kong. Language and Education, 25(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.553287
Gass, S. M. and Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction and output in second language acquisition. In J. Williams and B. VanPatten (eds), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 175–199). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Helm, F. and Guarda, M. (2015). ‘Improvisation is not allowed in a second language’:
A survey of Italian lecturers’ concerns about teaching their subjects through English. Language Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2015-0017
Konakahara, M., Murata, K. and Iino, M. (2019). English-medium instruction in a Japanese university: Exploring students’ and lecturers’ voices from an ELF perspective. In
K. Murata (ed.), English-medium instruction from an English as a lingua franca perspective: Exploring the higher education context (pp. 157–175). Routledge.
Lasagabaster, D. (2022). English-medium instruction in higher education. Cambridge University Press.
Lasagabaster, D. and Doiz, A. (2022). Classroom interaction in English-medium instruction: Are there differences between disciplines? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2022.2151615
Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction: Content and language in policy and practice. Oxford University Press.
Mercer, N. and Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
Sahan, K. and Rose, H. (2021). Translanguaging or code-switching? Re-examining the functions of language in EMI classrooms. In B. Di Sabato and B. Hughes (eds), Multilingual perspectives from Europe and beyond on language policy and practice
(pp. 348–356). Routledge.
Söderlundh, H. (2013). Applying transnational strategies locally: English as a medium of instruction in Swedish higher education. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 13(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.278
Studer, P. (2018). English in the age of comprehensive internationalisation: Defining competence guidelines for teachers in higher education. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée VALS-ASLA, 107, 27–47.
Tarnopolsky, O. B. and Goodman, B. A. (2014). The ecology of language in classrooms at a university in eastern Ukraine. Language and Education, 28(4), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.890215
Wegerif, R., Mercer, N. and Major, L. (2019). Introduction to the Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif and L. Major (eds), The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education (pp. 1–8). Routledge.