The use of questions as a form of interaction in the Italian EMI setting
Face-to-face and online lectures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jmtp.23493Keywords:
Display questions, English Medium Instruction (EMI), face-to-face teaching, online lectures, procedural questions, referential questionsAbstract
Questions play a fundamental role in the interaction between students and teachers. In English-medium instruction (EMI) classes, the strategic use of questions can strongly influence not only the learning process regarding content, but also the active participation of students, and consequently the development of their interaction skills, thereby allowing them to deploy higher-order thinking skills, which are particularly important in higher education. Online teaching, which has come to the forefront during the past two years due to the COVID-19 pandemic, has made lecturer–student interaction even more challenging. The present paper seeks to frame questions as a potential source of interaction in EMI and to qualitatively compare questions produced by lecturers in face-to-face and online lectures. First, it will categorize questions as referential, display, or procedural, looking into their implications and potential in terms of both language and content processing and learning. It will then illustrate examples of the use of questions in four EMI lectures, two face-to-face lectures and two online, from four different disciplines, which were transcribed, analysed and compared. Results reveal differences in the distribution of questions across the two learning methods and shed light on the interactional style used in traditional and online EMI lectures.
References
Agasisti, T. and Soncin, M. (2021). Higher education in troubled times: On the impact of COVID-19 in Italy. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859689
Airey, J. (2011). Talking about teaching in English: Swedish university lecturers’ experiences of changing teaching language. Iberica, 22, 35–54.
Appolloni, A., Colasanti, N., Fantauzzi, C., Fiorani, G. and Frondizi, R. (2021). Distance learning as a resilience strategy during COVID-19: An analysis of the Italian context. Sustainability, 13(3), 1388. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031388
Athanasiadou, A. (1991). The discourse function of questions. Pragmatics, 1(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.1.1.02ath
Austin, J. L. (2003). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. and Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay.
Boyd, M. P. (2015). Relations between teacher questioning and student talk in one elementary ELL classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(3), 370–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X16632451
Bozkurt, A. and Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to coronavirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–6.
Chang, Y. (2012). The use of questions by lecturers in lectures given in English: Influences of disciplinary cultures. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.002
Chiasson, K., Terras, K. and Smart, K. (2015). Faculty perceptions of moving a face-to-face course to online instruction. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 12(3), 321–240. https://doi.org/ 10.19030/tlc.v12i3.9315
Cicillini, S. And Giacosa, A. (2020a). Online English-medium instruction (EMI) classes. What we have learned so far. In G. Adorni, A. Lorenzo, L. De Manzoni and E. Medvet (eds), Atti convegno nazionale DIDAMATiCA (pp. 178–185). AICA.
Cicillini, S. and Giacosa, S. (2020b). Communication and interaction from face-to-face to online EMI degree programmes in the students’ perspective – a case study. European distance and e-learning network (EDEN) proceedings 2020 research workshop, Lisbon, 21–23 October (pp. 422–432).
Cicillini, S. and Giacosa, S. (2020c). English-medium instruction lecturers’ and students’ perceptions about the transition from in-person to emergency remote education. European Scientific Journal, 16(38), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.20.v16n38p46
Costa, F. and Mair, O. (2023). Online input and EMI pedagogy in the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. In F. Costa and C. Mariotti (eds), Input in English-medium instruction (pp. 97–115). Routledge.
Costa, F. and Mariotti, C. (2021). Strategies to enhance comprehension in EMI lectures examples from the Italian context. In D. Lasagabaster and A. Doiz (eds), Language use in English-medium instruction at university: International perspectives on teacher practice (pp. 80–99). Routledge.
Coulthard, M. and Brazil, D. (1992). Exchange structure. In M. Coulthard (ed.), Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis (pp. 51–78). Routledge.
Crawford Camiciottoli, B. C. (2007). Interaction in academic lectures vs. written text materials: The case of questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(7), 1216–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.08.007
Dafouz, E. and Sánchez-García, D. (2013). ‘Does everybody understand?’ Teacher questions across disciplines in English-mediated university lectures: An exploratory study. Language Value, 5(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2013.5.7
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). John Benjamins.
Doiz, A. and Lasagabaster, D. (2020). Dealing with language issues in English-medium instruction at university: A comprehensive approach. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1727409
Doiz, A. and Lasagabaster, D. (2022). Looking into English-medium instruction teachers’ metadiscourse: An ELF perspective. System, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102730
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Fortanet-Gómez, I. and Ruiz-Madrid, M. N. (2014). Multimodality for comprehensive communication in the classroom: Questions in guest lectures. Ibérica, 28. Retrieved on 27 February 2023 from https://www.revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/245
Genc, E. and Yuksel, D. (2021). Teacher questions in English medium instruction classrooms in a Turkish higher education setting. Linguistics and Education, 66, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100992
Hodges, C., Moore, S. and Lockee, B., Trust, T. and Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 85–98. Retrieved on 27 February 2023 from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Hu, G. and Li, X. (2017). Asking and answering questions in English-medium instruction classrooms: What is the cognitive and syntactic complexity level? In J. Zhao, and L. Q. Dixon (eds), English-medium instruction in Chinese universities: Perspectives, discourse and evaluation (pp. 184–203). Routledge.
Johnson, J. H. and Picciuolo, M. (2020). Interaction in spoken academic discourse in an EMI context: The use of questions. Sixth International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’20). Universitat Politècnica de València. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/HEAd20.2020.11018
Lasagabaster, D. and Doiz, A. (2022). Classroom interaction in English-medium instruction: Are there differences between disciplines? Language, Culture and Curriculum. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2022.2151615
Lin, S-L., Wen, T-H., Ching, G. and Huang, Y-C. (2021). Experiences and challenges of an English as a medium of instruction course in Taiwan during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 12920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182412920
Luporini, A. (2020). Implementing an online English linguistics course during the COVID-19 emergency in Italy: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. ASp [Online]. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.6682
Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction. Oxford University Press.
Mariotti, C. (2007). Interaction strategies in English-medium instruction. FrancoAngeli.
Markee, N. P. P. (2000). Conversation analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum.
McComas, W. F. and Abraham, L. (2005). Asking more effective questions. Retrieved on 27 February 2023 from https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/sites/ca.centre-for-teaching-excellence/files/uploads/files/asking_better_questions.pdf
McCormick, D. E. and Donato, R. (2000). Teacher questions as scaffolded assistance in an ESL classroom. In J. K. Hall and L. Stoops Verplaetse (eds), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 183–201). Routledge.
McHoul, A. W. (1978). The organisation of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 182–213.
Mehan, H. (1985). The structure of classroom discourse. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 119–131). Academic Press.
Menegale, M. (2008). Expanding teacher–student interaction through more effective classroom questions: From traditional teacher-fronted lessons to student-centred lessons in CLIL. In C. M. Coonan (ed.), CLIL e l’apprendimento delle lingue. Le sfide del nuovo ambiente di apprendimento (pp. 105–127). Libreria Cafoscarina.
Molino, A. (2015). Comprensione e interazione nelle lezioni universitarie in lingua inglese. RiCognizioni, 2(4), 129–143. https://doi/org/10.13135/2384-8987/1119
Moncada-Comas, B. and Diert-Boté, I. (2022). Good practices in ESP: The interplay between technology and interaction through multimodal and multichannel practices. In S. Sánchez-García and R. Clouet (eds), Intercultural communication and ubiquitous learning in multimodal English language education (pp. 146–183). IGI Global.
Morell, T. (2007). What enhances EFL students’ participation in lecture discourse? Student, lecturer and discourse perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 222–237. https://doi/org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.07.002
Nassaji, H. and Wells, G. (2000). What’s the use of ‘triadic dialogue’? An investigation of teacher–student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21, 376–406. https://doi/org/10.1093/applin/21.3.376
Pica T. (1994). Questions from the language classroom: Research perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 49–79.
Querol-Julián, M. and Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2019). The impact of online technologies and English medium instruction on university lectures in international learning contexts: A systematic review. ESP Today, 7(1), 2–23.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Sánchez-García, D. (2018). Teacher questioning: Exploring student interaction and cognitive engagement in Spanish and EMI university lectures. Porta Linguarum, Monográfico III, 103–120.
Sánchez-García, D. (2020). Mapping lecturer questions and their pedagogical goals in Spanish- and English-medium instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education, 8(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18016.san
Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.
Stahl, R. J. (1994). Using ‘think-time’ and ‘wait-time’ skillfully in the classroom. ERIC Digest. Retrieved on 27 February 2023 from https://www.ericdigests.org/1995-1/think.htm
Thompson, S. (1998). Why ask questions in monologue? Language choice at work in scientific and linguistic talk. In S. Hunston (ed.), Language at work (pp. 137–150). University of Birmingham Press.
Vraciu, A. and Curell, H. (2022). Language learning opportunities in native vs non-native EMI lecturer input: Insights for a language-aware approach to EMI teacher training. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2059666
Wilen, W. (1991). Questioning skills for teachers. National Educational Association.
