Item-Based Acquisition of Dislocation in Early Child French
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jmbs.15679Keywords:
Dislocation, Usage-based, French, Language acquisition, Item-based schemaAbstract
This study tests whether the usage-based concept of item-based schema can explain the development of constructions other than verb-argument constructions (VACs). Through a corpus study of 600 dislocations produced by two French children between age 1;7.12 and 2;5.11, and 600 from their input, we show that the concept of item-based schemas can indeed be extended to other types of constructions. We also show that the earliest item-based schemas produced by children are similar to specific syntactic featuress of dislocations in their input, and that the dislocations produced by the adults of our corpus can also be described in terms of item-based schemas. Based on these results, we make the hypothesis that the dislocations of adults may not necessarily be produced based on a more abstract construction, and that the radical exemplar model developed by Ambridge (2019) could also explain our data.
References
Ahrens, K. (1995). The mental representation of verbs. PhD, University of California, San Diego.
Ambridge, B. (2019). Against stored abstraction: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition. First Language. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723719869731
Arnon, I. (2009). Starting big: The role of multi-word phrases in language learning and use. PhD, Stanford University.
Arnon, I., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). The role of multiword building blocks in explaining L1–L2 differences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(2), 621–36.
Arnon, I., & Clark, E. V. (2011). When ‘on your feet’ is better than ‘feet’: Children’s word production is facilitated in familiar sentence-frames. Language Learning and Development, 7, 107–29.
Avanzi, M., Gendrot, C., & Lacheret-Dujour, A. (2010). Is there a prosodic difference between left-dislocated and heavy subjects? Evidence from spontaneous French. Speech Prosody 2010: 5th International Conference (pp. 20–30). Chicago: International Speech Communication Association.
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning. Psychological Science, 19(3), 241–8.
Barnes, B. K. (1985). Left detachment in spoken standard French. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company.
Belletti, A., & Manetti, C. (2019). Topics and passives in Italian-speaking children and adults. Language Acquisition, 26(2), 153–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2018.1508465
Blasco-Dulbecco, M. (1999). Les dislocations en français contemporain: Étude syntaxique. Paris: Honoré Champion Editeur.
Braine, M. (1976). Children’s first word combinations (Vol. 41). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Brunetti, L., Avanzi, M., & Gendrot, C. (2013). A quantitative study of sentence topic and its syntactic/prosodic correlates on a French spoken corpus: Methodological and theoretical issues. Paper presented at the Information Structure in Spoken Language Corpora, University of Bielefeld, Germany.
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–33.
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2003). A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science, 27, 843–73.
Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. (2005). Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8, 500–8.
Cinque, G. (1983). ‘Topic’ constructions in some European languages and ‘connectedness’. In K. Ehlich & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Connectedness in sentence text and discourse (pp. 7–42). Tilburg: KBU.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
D?browska, E. (2000). From formula to schema: The acquisition of English questions. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 83–102.
D?browska, E., & Lieven, E. (2005). Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), 437–74.
D?browska, E., Rowland, C. F., & Theakston, A. (2009). The acquisition of question with long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 571–97.
Danell, K. J. (1995). Le phénomène de concurrence en français moderne: Réflexions à partir de an-année, jour-journée, paraître-apparaître, et d’autres. Uppsala: Swedish Science Press.
De Cat, C. (2002). French dislocation. PhD thesis, University of York, UK.
De Cat, C. (2004). Apparent non-nominative subjects in L1 French. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts (pp. 60–115). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
De Cat, C. (2007). French dislocation, interpretation, syntax, acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Cat, C. (2009). Experimental evidence for preschoolers’ mastery of ‘topic’. Language Acquisition, 16, 224–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489220903190612
Delais-Roussarie, E., Doetjes, J., & Sleeman, P. (2004). Dislocation. In F. Corblin & H. De Swart (Eds.), Handbook of French Semantics (pp. 501–29). Stanford: CLSI Publication.
Demuth, K., & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35(1), 99–127.
Ellis, N. C., & Ogden, D. C. (2017). Thinking about multiword constructions: Usage-based approaches to acquisition and processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(2), 604–20.
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016). Language usage, acquisition, and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20(1), 29–62.
Ferdinand, A. (1996). The development of functional categories: The acquisition of the subject in French (Vol. 23). The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
Ferdinand, A. (1997). The development of phrase structure in child French. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.14.10fer
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M., Jones, G., & Gobet, F. (2015). Simulating the cross-linguistic pattern of Optional Infinitive errors in children’s declaratives and Wh- questions. Cognition, 143, 61–76.
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A., & Bencini, G. M. L. (2005). Support from processing for a constructional approach to grammar. In A. E. Tyler, M. Takada, Y. Kim & D. Marinova (Eds.), Language in use: Cognitive and discourse perspectives on language and language learning (pp. 3–18). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289–316.
Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & Sethuraman, N. (2005). Role of prediction in construction learning. Journal of Child Language, 32, 407–26.
Gonzalez Rey, I. (2002). La phraséologie du français. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.
Gross, G. (1996). Les expressions figées en français; noms composés et autres locutions. Paris: Éditions Ophrys.
Horváth, M. G. (2016). Analyse pragmatico-discursive des SN disloqués à droite du français parlé. Revue Romane, 51(2), 244–70.
Horváth, M. G. (2018). Le français parlé informel: Stratégies de topicalisation. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Jourdain, M., & Canut, E. (2018). Les îlots verbaux dans les dislocations chez l’enfant français. SHS Web of Conference, 46, 10009.
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., & Raymond, W. (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 229–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kako, E. (2006). The semantics of syntactic frames. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 562–75.
Klein, J. (2019). L’expression du topic et l’usage des expressions référentielles dans les dialogues mère-enfant: Une mise en perspective multidimensionnelle des différents moyens d’expression référentielle en français et en allemand. PhD, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3, Paris.
Krifka, M. (2007). Basic notions of information structure. In C. Féry, G. Fanselow & M. Krifka (Eds.), The notions of information structure (pp. 13–56). Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Labelle, M., & Valois, D. (1996). The status of post-verbal subjects in French child language. Probus, 8(1), 53–80.
Lahousse, K. (2003). Le sujet nominal postverbal en français moderne. PhD thesis, KU Leuven.
Lambrecht, K. (1981). Topic, antitopic and verb agreement in non-standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Lambrecht, K. (1987). On the status of SVO sentences in French discourse. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Legendre, G., Culbertson, J., Barrière, I., Nazzi, T., & Goyet, L. (2010). Experimental and empirical evidence for the status and acquisition of subject clitices and agreement marking in adult and child spoken French. In V. Torrens, L. Escobar, A. Gavarro & J. G. Mangado (Eds.), Movement and clitics (pp. 333–60). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lieven, E., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 30(2), 333–70.
Lieven, E., Pine, J. M., & Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24, 187–220.
Lieven, E., Pine, J. M., & Dresner Barnes, H. (1992). Individual differences in early vocabulary development. Journal of Child Language, 19, 287–310.
MacWhinney, B., & Snow, C. E. (1990). The child language data exchange system: An update. Journal of Child Language, 17, 457–72.
Manetti, C., & Belletti, A. (2017). The production of clitic left dislocations by Italian-speaking children and the role of intervention. In M. La Mendola & J. Scott (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 443–51). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Parisse, C. (2008). Left-dislocated subjects: A construction typical of young French-speaking children? In P. Guijarro Fuentes, M. Pilar Larrañaga & J. Clibbens (Eds.), First language acquisition of morphology and syntax: Perspectives across languages and learners (pp. 13–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Prince, E. F. (1981). Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223–55). New York: Academic Press.
Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2007). Processing relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 1–23.
Reinhart, T. (1981). Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27(1), 53–94.
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.012
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Sentence topic and discourse topic. Papers in Slavic Philology, 1, 49–61.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wray, A. (2009). Identifying formulaic language: Persistent challenges and new opportunities. In R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali & K. M. Wheatley (Eds.), Formulaic language: Distribution and historical change (Vol. 1, pp. 27–51). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
