Should they stay or should they go?

Alliances and rapport in child-caregiver-therapist SLT sessions

Authors

  • Bracha Nir University of Haifa
  • Gonen Dori-Hacohen University of Massachusetts, Amherst

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.25505

Keywords:

dyad, triad, rapport, speech-language therapy, alliances, openings

Abstract

Background: The study investigates how participants in the institutional interaction between caregiver-child-therapist negotiate rapport-building. This setting, which is usually taken as a dyad, is an actual triad.

Method: We focus on examples taken from five speech-language therapy (SLT) openings, analyzing the resources that lead to alliances as rapport-building through the turns of talk. We connect these alliances to the configuration of the setting.

Results: The analyses highlight different dyadic participant alliances within the triadic constellation: child-therapist, caregiver-therapist, therapist-child. These alliances are formed through complaints regarding the participants’ investment in the therapy. The therapists concentrate their efforts on the child, whereas the parents focus on creating rapport with the therapist.

Discussion and conclusion: The balancing act of rapport-building in the therapeutic triad of SLT is complicated, since the family is not composed of equal members. Therefore, ‘ironing’ the creases of the caregiver-child-therapist into a pseudo-dyad either ignores the differences that exist between a parent and a child or does not work.

Author Biographies

  • Bracha Nir, University of Haifa

    Bracha Nir (PhD in linguistics, 2008; MA in cognitive studies of language and language use; BA in linguistics, Tel Aviv University, Israel) is a senior lecturer at the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at the University of Haifa, Israel. She is a functionalist linguist working within the frameworks of socio-cognitive discourse analysis and text psycholinguistics, focusing on form–function relations in language, in extended discourse, and in dialogic interaction (both mundane and institutional). Her studies explore the role of context in shaping meaning and structure in the different domains of grammar (from morphology to syntax to text), in constraining language use from a developmental, cross-linguistic perspective, and in serving various functions of intersubjectivity. Currently, she is editor of Constructions and Frames, a forum for construction-based approaches to language analysis.

  • Gonen Dori-Hacohen, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

    Gonen Dori-Hacohen (PhD 2009, University of Haifa, Israel; MA in communication and journalism, the Hebrew University; MA in sociology, UCLA; BA from the Open University of Israel) is an associate professor at the Department of Communication at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He is a discourse analyst, studying interactions in the media and in mundane situations, focusing on the intersection of interaction, culture, politics, and the media. Currently, he studies civic participation in the Israeli public sphere, US political talk, and other arenas of communication.

References

Bales, R. F., and Parsons, T. (2013 [1956]). Family: Socialization and interaction process. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315824307

Bolozky, S. (1979). On the new imperative in colloquial Hebrew. Hebrew Annual Review, 3, 17–24.

Boxer, D. (2010). Complaints: How to gripe and establish rapport. In A. Martínez-Flor and E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 163–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.26.10box

Clark, E. (2015). ‘It’s all good’: Evaluation in speech-language therapy sessions. Doctoral dissertation, Australian National University. https://doi.org/10.25911/5D723F156B175

Defibaugh, S. (2014). Solidarity and alignment in nurse practitioner–patient interactions. Discourse & Communication, 8(3), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481314537573

Dori-Hacohen, G. (2014). Establishing social groups in Hebrew: ‘We’ in political radio phone-in programs. In T.-S. Pavlidou (Ed.), Constructing collectivity: ‘We’ across languages and contexts (pp. 187–206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.239.13dor

Drew, P., and Walker, T. (2009). Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2400–2414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.046

Ferguson, A., and Armstrong, E. (2004). Reflections on speech-language therapists’ talk: Implications for clinical practice and education. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39(4), 469–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/1368282042000226879

Goffman, E. (1978). Response cries. Language, 54(4), 787–815. https://doi.org/10.2307/413235

Goldberg, J. A. (1990). Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis in terms of relationally neutral, power-and rapport-oriented acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(6), 883–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90045-F

Heatherington, L., and Friedlander, M. L. (2014). From dyads to triads, and beyond: Relational control in individual and family therapy. In L. E. Rogers and V. Escudero (Eds.), Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form (pp. 123–150). London: Routledge.

Heinemann, T. (2009). Participation and exclusion in third party complaints. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2435–2451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.044

Heritage, J. (2016). On the diversity of ‘changes of state’ and their indices. Journal of Pragmatics, 104, 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.007

Holt, E. (2019). Conversation analysis and laughter. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 275–279). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Horton, S. (2006). A framework for description and analysis of therapy for language impairment in aphasia. Aphasiology, 20(6), 528–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600590130

Jautz, S. (2013). Thanking formulae in English: Explorations across varieties and genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.230

Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger and P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 156–197). Clevedon and Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.

Laforest, M. (2009). Complaining in front of a witness: Aspects of blaming others for their behaviour in multi-party family interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2452–2464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.043

Lawton, M., Sage, K., Haddock, G., Conroy, P., and Serrant, L. (2018). Speech and language therapists’ perspectives of therapeutic alliance construction and maintenance in aphasia rehabilitation post-stroke. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(3), 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12368

Leahy, M. M., and Walsh, I. P. (2008). Talk in interaction in the speech-language pathology clinic: Bringing theory to practice through discourse. Topics in Language Disorders, 28(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TLD.0000333598.53339.5a

Liu, R. Y. (2022). Constructing childhood through social interaction: Rights, obligations, and accountability in adult-child interaction. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.

Mandelbaum, J. (1991). Conversational non-cooperation: An exploration of disattended complaints. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 25(1–4), 97–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819109389359

Nir, B., Mayost-Abramovich, I., and Dori-Hacohen, G. (2019). Balancing institutional authority and children’s agency: The Hebrew verb lircot [to want] in speech language therapy sessions. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 10(2), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.20365

Nooteboom, B. (2006). Simmel’s treatise on the triad (1908). Journal of Institutional Economics, 2(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137406000452

Pomerantz, A. (1988). Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs, 55(4), 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376177

Ruusuvuori, J., and Lindfors, P. (2009). Complaining about previous treatment in health care settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2415–2434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.045

Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9(2), 111–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148124

Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 205–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.2.205

Schegloff, E. A. (2005). On integrity in inquiry … of the investigated, not the investigator. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 455–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054402

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005). Rapport management theory and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(3), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.3.335

Swedberg, R. (2018). How to use Max Weber’s ideal type in sociological analysis. Journal of Classical Sociology, 18(3), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X17743643

Tudini, V., and Dooly, M. (2021). Complaining for rapport building: Troubles talk in a pre-service language teacher online video exchange. Linguistics and Education, 64, 100941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100941

Walsh, I. P., and Duchan, J. F. (2011). Product and process depictions of rapport between clients and their speech-language pathologists during clinical interactions. In R. J. Fourie (Ed.), Therapeutic processes for communication disorders: A guide for clinicians and students (pp. 69–82). Hove: Psychology Press.

Published

2023-10-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Nir, B., & Dori-Hacohen, G. (2023). Should they stay or should they go? Alliances and rapport in child-caregiver-therapist SLT sessions. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 14(3), 430-455. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.25505