Action formation, ascription, and the talk of people with aphasia

Authors

  • Isabel L. Windeatt-Harrison University of Sheffield
  • Traci Walker University of Sheffield

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.24384

Keywords:

aphasia, action formation, action ascription, conversation analysis, agency, silence

Abstract

Background: This article uncovers why people with severe expressive aphasia’s turns-at-talk are sometimes not treated as producing an action by their communication partners, and the impact this has on the person with aphasia’s (PWA’s) agency. We demonstrate resources PWAs use to pursue talk and which assist with the production of a recognizable action.

Method: We examined turns produced by four PWAs and their communication partners (CPs), where present, using conversation analysis, identifying features that do not receive a response and features promoting action ascription.

Analysis: The PWAs’ semantically empty or unclear turns, turns lacking sequential context, or the CPs’ focus on their own actions led to a lack of action ascription. However, CPs do attend to PWAs’ multimodal features of interaction, and PWAs’ repetition accompanied by an upgraded gesture was shown to pursue a response. Action ascription was aided by the PWAs’ preserved use of silence as a communicative device.

Discussion: When PWAs’ actions are not appropriately ascribed, their agency may be diminished. Communication partners should attend to all features of the PWA’s turns, including gesture and silence, to progress the PWA’s action, rather than their own misappropriated action. This may mean accepting a delay in progressivity while the PWA pursues an appropriate response. Through this, the PWA’s agency in interaction can be maintained, and intersubjectivity achieved.

Author Biographies

  • Isabel L. Windeatt-Harrison, University of Sheffield

    Isabel Windeatt-Harrison was until recently a research fellow in the School of Health Sciences at the University of Nottingham. She is now at the University of Sheffield, UK. Her research examines the communication of people living with aphasia and dementia using conversation analysis.

  • Traci Walker, University of Sheffield

    Traci Walker is a senior lecturer in the Department of Human Communication Sciences, University of Sheffield. Her research uses the methodology of conversation analysis to investigate the function and use of linguistic structures in both typical and atypical communication.

References

Atkinson, J. M., and Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Structures_of_Social_Action.html?id=lYlMNqYwBUIC

Auer, P. (2021). Turn-allocation and gaze: A multimodal revision of the ‘current-speaker-selects-next’ rule of the turn-taking system of conversation analysis. Discourse Studies, 23(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620966922

Barnes, S. (2013). Proper noun anomia in conversation: A description of how a man with chronic anomia constructed referencing turns. Aphasiology, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.671928

Barnes, S. (2014). Managing intersubjectivity in aphasia. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(2), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.900216

Barnes, S., and Ferguson, A. (2012). Speakership asymmetry during topic talk involving a person with aphasia. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 3(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v3i1.27

Barnes, S., and Ferguson, A. (2015). Conversation partner responses to problematic talk produced by people with aphasia: Some alternatives to initiating, completing, or pursuing repair. Aphasiology, 29(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.874547

Barnes, S., and Possemato, F. (2020). Shifting granularity: The case of correction and aphasia. In R. Wilkinson, J. P. Rae, and G. Rasmussen (Eds.), Atypical interaction: The impact of communicative impairments within everyday talk. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28799-3_8

Barnes, S., Candlin, C. N., and Ferguson, A. (2013). Aphasia and topic initiation in conversation: A case study. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48(1), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00186.x

Berthier, M. L. (2005). Poststroke aphasia: Epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment. Drugs and Aging, 22(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200522020-00006

Bloch, S., and Beeke, S. (2008). Co-constructed talk in the conversations of people with dysarthria and aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 22(12), 974–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200802394831

Enfield, N. J., and Sidnell, J. (2017). On the concept of action in the study of interaction. Discourse Studies, 19(5), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617730235

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face interaction. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.

Goodwin, C. (2000). Gesture, aphasia and interaction. In D. McNeil (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 84–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.006

Goodwin, C. (2003). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 90–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goodwin, C. (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: The social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.151

Goodwin, C. (2017). Co-operative action. Learning in doing series: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, M. H., and Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62(1–2), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.51

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.

Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684

Hoey, E. M. (2015). Lapses: How people arrive at, and deal with, discontinuities in talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(4), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1090116

Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Rodger and P. Bull (Eds.), Intercommunication series, 3. Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 166–196). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef

Kendrick, K. H., and Torreira, F. (2015). The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52(4), 255–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997

Killmer, H., Beeke, S., and Svennevig, J. (2020). Collaborative storytelling with a person with aphasia: Promoting agency in a multiparty interaction. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 11(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.20902

Laakso, M. (2003). Collaborative construction of repair in aphasic conversation. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 163–188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Levinson, S. C. (2012). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). New York: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch6

Levinson, S. C., and Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(731), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731

Martinelli, M. (2021). Collaborative talk in healthcare interactions between students and people with aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 56(5), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12636

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016

Penn, C., Frankel, T., and Wilkinson, R. (2015). Problems with the understandability of aphasic talk: Mentions of persons as a trouble source in interaction. Aphasiology, 29(3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.986632

Perkins, L. (1995). Applying conversation analysis to aphasia: Clinical implications and analytic issues. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 30(3), 372–383. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829509021449

Perkins, L. (2003). Negotiating repair in aphasic conversation. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 147–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pomerantz, A., and Heritage, J. (2012). Preference. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). New York: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch11

Rossano, F. (2013). Gaze in conversation. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 308–329). New York: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch15

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4(1)), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192X-2015-1-142-202

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208

Schegloff, E. A., and Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289

Simmons-Mackie, N., and Kagan, A. (1999). Communication strategies used by ‘good’ versus ‘poor’ speaking partners of individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 13(9–11), 807–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399401894

Stivers, T., and Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258

Tuomenoksa, A., Beeke, S., and Klippi, A. (2022). People with non-fluent aphasia initiating actions in everyday conversation with familiar conversation partners: Resources for participation. Aphasiology, 36(5), 575–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1852518

Wilkinson, R. (1999). Sequentiality as a problem and resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: Analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology, 13(4–5), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399402127

Wilkinson, R. (2007). Managing linguistic incompetence as a delicate issue in aphasic talk-in-interaction: On the use of laughter in prolonged repair sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 542–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.010

Wilkinson, R. (2013). Gestural depiction in acquired language disorders: On the form and use of iconic gestures in aphasic talk-in-interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.767558

Wilkinson, R., Lock, S., Bryan, K., and Sage, K. (2011). Interaction-focused intervention for acquired language disorders: Facilitating mutual adaptation in couples where one partner has aphasia. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2011.551140

Windeatt, I. L. (2021). Understanding the role of silence in conversations with people with aphasia. Doctoral thesis, University of Sheffield. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/29940

Published

2023-05-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Windeatt-Harrison, I. L., & Walker, T. (2023). Action formation, ascription, and the talk of people with aphasia. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 14(2), 292-311. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.24384