Destigmatizing disfluency

Stuttering in peer telephone support

Authors

  • Christopher Pudlinski Central Connecticut State University
  • Rachel S. Y. Chen Nanyang Technological University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.24376

Keywords:

disfluency, stuttering, stigma, conversation analysis, peer support

Abstract

Background: Typically understood as a symptom of a speech disorder, stuttering is the verbal repetition of sounds, words, or phrases that suspend the progression of a speaker’s turn.

Method: Using conversation analysis, over 180 phrasal multisyllabic stutters were found in audio recordings of peer telephone support in the United States.

Results: Most phrasal stutters arise from early, within-turn indicators of potential sequential, semantic, or syntactic trouble. Typically produced with quick pacing, the stutters are varied, including the latching of sounds across words, abbreviated words, word blends, and/or unintelligible sounds. Elongated or cut-off sounds often indicate the seeming end of a stutter, with either abandonment or a typically fluent completion of a current turn occurring upon a stutter’s conclusion. Importantly, the other interactant never interrupts or completes the stutter.

Discussion/conclusion: These findings contradict prior conversation analytic studies of stutters and describe stuttering as a normalized everyday action, where speakers can successfully navigate disfluency to reach eventual fluency.

Author Biographies

  • Christopher Pudlinski, Central Connecticut State University

    Christopher Pudlinski (PhD, Temple University) is Professor of Communication at Central Connecticut State University, USA. His research interests include the situated practice of advice, empathy, empowerment, silence, and other types of supportive interaction.

  • Rachel S. Y. Chen, Nanyang Technological University

    Rachel S. Y. Chen (PhD, UC Berkeley and San Francisco State University) is an assistant professor at the College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, where she supports the Linguistics and Multilingualism program. Her research focuses on the everyday embodied interactions of disabled and neurodiverse populations, such as non-speaking autistic individuals.

References

Acton, C. (2004). A conversation analysis perspective on stammering: Some reflections and observations. Stammering Research, 1(3), 249–270.

Alharbi, S., Hasan, M., Simons, A. J., Brumfitt, S., and Green, P. (2017). Detecting stuttering events in transcripts of children’s speech. In N. Camelin, Y. Estève, and C. Martín-Vide (Eds.), Statistical language and speech processing (pp. 217–228). Cham: Springer International. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/124202; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68456-7_18

Allwood, J. (2017). Fluency or disfluency? Proceedings of DiSS 2017. Retrieved on 29 October 2022 from https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/54965

American Speech?Language?Hearing Association (n. d.). Fluency disorders (practice portal). Retrieved on 31 January 2023 from https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/fluency-disorders

Berger, I. (2011). Support and evidence for considering local contingencies in studying and transcribing silence in conversation. Pragmatics, 21(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.3.01ber

Clark, H. H., and Wasow, T. (1998). Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 37(3), 201–242. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0693

De Nil, L. F., and Brutten, G. J. (1991). Speech associated attitudes of stuttering and nonstuttering children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3401.60

Fox, B. A., Maschler, Y., and Uhmann, S. (2010). A cross-linguistic study of self-repair: Evidence from English, German, and Hebrew. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(9), 2487–2505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.006

Goldman-Eisler, F. (1967). Sequential temporal patterns and cognitive processes in speech. Language and Speech, 10(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096701000205

Henderson, A., Goldman-Eisler, F., and Skarbek, A. (1966). Sequential temporal patterns in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 9(4), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096600900402

Ingham, R. J., Martin, R. R., and Kuhl, P. (1974). Modification and control of rate of speaking by stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17(3), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1703.489

James, S., Brumfitt, S., and Cudd, P. (1999). Communicating by telephone: Views of people with a stuttering impairment. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 24(4), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-730X(99)00019-4

Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger and P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 166–196). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and interactional resource. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interactional competence. Washington D.C.: University Press of America.

Jefferson, G. (1996). On the poetics of ordinary talk. Text and Performance Quarterly, 16(1), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462939609366132

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef

Jones, P. H., and Ryan, B. P. (2001). Experimental analysis of the relationship between speaking rate and stuttering during mother–child conversation. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 13, 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016610420533

Kosmala, L. (2021). A multimodal contrastive study of (dis)fluency across languages and settings: Towards a multidimensional scale of inter-(dis)fluency. Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris Nanterre. Retrieved on 29 October 2022 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356782055

Li, W. (2021). British English-speaking speed 2020. Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(5), 93–100. Retrieved on 31 October 2022 from https://francis-press.com/uploads/papers/pv7j7Z9uRgQyPUxnVTDTPecUAEP0HJcWWhGErVeD.pdf

Lind, M., and Sønsterud, H. (2014). Co-construction of turns at talk: Active listening or disruptions in conversation with persons who stutter? Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 5(2), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v5i2.141

Logan, K. J. (2020). Fluency disorders: Stuttering, cluttering, and related fluency problems. San Diego: Plural Publishing.

Meyers, S. C., and Freeman, F. J. (1985). Interruptions as a variable in stuttering and disfluency. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 28(3), 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2803.435

Pudlinski, C. (2002). Accepting and rejecting advice as competent peers: Caller dilemmas on a warm line. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040040501

Riley, G. D., and Bakker, K. (2009). Stuttering severity instrument (4th ed.). Austin: Pro?Ed.

Rothwell, J. D. (2020). Practically speaking (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208

Schegloff, E. A. (2010). Some other ‘uh(m)’s. Discourse Processes, 47(2), 130–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903223380

Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., and Sacks, H. (1990). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 31–61). London and Washington D. C.: University Press of America. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041

Shames, G. H., and Sherrick, C. E. (1963). A discussion of nonfluency and stuttering as operant behavior. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 28(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.2801.03

ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895

Tetnowski, J. A., and Damico, J. S. (2001). A demonstration of the advantages of qualitative methodologies in stuttering research. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 26(1), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-730X(01)00094-8

Tetnowski, J. A., Damico, J. S., Bathel, J. A., and Franklin, T. C. (2004). Conversation analysis of children who stutter and parents who stutter. In A. Packmann, A. Meltzer, and H. F. Peters (Eds.), Theory, research and therapy in fluency disorders (pp. 271–279). Proceedings of the Fourth World Congress on Fluency Disorders, August 11–15, 2003, Montreal, Canada. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.

Tetnowski, J. A., Scott, K. S., and Rutland, B. F. (2021). Fluency and fluency disorders. In J. S. Damico, N. Müller, and M. J. Ball (Eds.), The handbook of language and speech disorders (pp. 414–444). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119606987.ch19

Walker, G. (2010). The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice: Rush-throughs in English talk-in-interaction. In D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, and M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in interaction. Studies in discourse and grammar (pp. 51–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1056073

Watson, J. B. (1987). Profiles of stutterers’ and nonstutterers’ affective, cognitive, and behavioral communication attitudes. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 12(6), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-730X(87)90009-X

Wilkinson, R., and Morris, S. (2020). ‘My own space in this world’: Stammering, telephone calls, and the progressivity and permeability of turns-at-talk. In R. Wilkinson, J. P. Rae, and G. Rasmussen (Eds.), Atypical interaction: The impact of communicative impairments within everyday talk (pp. 319–344). Cham: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28799-3_11

Woolf, G. (1967). The assessment of stuttering as struggle, avoidance, and expectancy. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 2(2), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682826709031315

World Health Organization (2020). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Retrieved on 24 January 2023 from https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health

Yaruss, J. S., and Quesal, R. W. (2004). Stuttering and the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF): An update. Journal of communication disorders, 37(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00052-2

Yaruss, J. S., and Quesal, R. W. (2006). Overall assessment of the speaker’s experience of stuttering (OASES): Documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31(2), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.02.002

Published

2023-05-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pudlinski, C., & Chen, R. S. Y. (2023). Destigmatizing disfluency: Stuttering in peer telephone support. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 14(2), 220-240. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.24376