Social and moral relevance of memory
Knowing and remembering in conversations with a person with traumatic brain injury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.21982Keywords:
Conversation Analysis, Traumatic Brain Injury, Knowledge, Memory, Epistemic ResponsibilityAbstract
Background: Previous research has discussed how remembering is a sociopsychological phenomenon; that is, a phenomenon that happens as an interplay between internal cognitive processes as well as external social factors. This article examines remembering from this perspective in conversations between a father and his son, who has suffered traumatic brain injury and has problems with his short-term memory as a result.
Method: We examined 82 known-answer questions using conversation analysis. Each question, as well as the interaction it was part of, was transcribed and analyzed as single instances (single cases), and then compared and analyzed as a joint collection.
Results: In both first, second, and third position, the father formulated his utterances in such a way that the son was treated as someone who had access to the knowledge. In addition, when the son claimed to not know something, the father challenged this and constructed his son as someone who was responsible for remembering the information.
Conclusion: We show how knowing and remembering are social phenomena that carry their own moral rules and practices in interaction. By challenging his son’s claims of not knowing and designing turns that make the son accountable for knowing information, the father makes his son answer questions he initially claimed not to know the answers to.
References
Antaki, C. (2013a). Recipient-side test questions. Discourse Studies, 15(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612466450
Antaki, C. (2013b). Two conversational practices for encouraging adults with intellectual disabilities to reflect on their activities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(6), 580–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01572.x
Antaki, C., and Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch26
Atkinson, J. M., and Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnes, S. (2012). ‘Planning’ talk and traumatic brain injury: An exploratory application of conversation analysis. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 3(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v3i2.115
Beeke, S., Beckley, F., Best, W., Johnson, F., Edwards, S., and Maxim, J. (2013). Extended turn construction and test question sequences in the conversations of three speakers with agrammatic aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 27(10–11), 784–804. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2013.808267
Body, R. (2007). Decision making and somatic markers in conversation after traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 21(3–4), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600911450
Body, R., and Parker, M. (2005). Topic repetitiveness after traumatic brain injury: An emergent, jointly managed behaviour. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19(5), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200400027189
Chafe, W., and Nichols, J. (Eds.) (1986). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood: Ablex.
Clayman, S., and Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air (vol. 15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623
Coste, C., Agar, N., Petitfour, E., Quinette, P., Guillery-Girard, B., Azouvi, P., and Piolino, P. (2011). Exploring the roles of the executive and short-term feature-binding functions in retrieval of retrograde autobiographical memories in severe traumatic brain injury. Cortex, 47(7), 771–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.07.004
Denman, A., and Wilkinson, R. (2011). Applying conversation analysis to traumatic brain injury: Investigating touching another person in everyday social interaction. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(3), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.511686
Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 470–520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P. (2013). Turn design. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch7
Edwards, D., and Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
Friedland, D., and Miller, N. (1998). Conversation analysis of communication breakdown after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/026990598122818
Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786746
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., and Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Heinemann, T. (2005). Where grammar and interaction meet: The preference for matched polarity. In A. Hakulinen and M. Selting (Eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction (pp. 375–402). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17.18hei
Hepburn, A., and Bolden, G. A. (2014). The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020
Heritage, J. (1988). Explanations as accounts: A conversation analytic perspective. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods (pp. 127–144). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
Heritage, J. (2012b). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
Heritage, J., and Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103
Hunkin, N. M., Parkin, A. J., Bradley, V. A., Burrows, E. H., Aldrich, F. K., Jansari, A., and Burdon-Cooper, C. (1995). Focal retrograde amnesia following closed head injury: A case study and theoretical account. Neuropsychologia, 33(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)00136-D
Hutchby, I. (2002). Resisting the incitement to talk in child counselling: Aspects of the utterance ‘I don’t know.’ Discourse Studies, 4(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040020201
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, 125, 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Kärkkäinen, E. (2003). Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.115
Keevallik, L. (2008). Clause combining and sequenced actions: The Estonian complementizer and pragmatic particle et. In R. Laury (Ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp. 125–152). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.80.07kee
Keevallik, L. (2011). The terms of not knowing. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, and J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.009
Knight, R. G., and O’Hagan, K. (2009). Autobiographical memory in long-term survivors of severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(5), 575–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390802363710
Koshik, I. (2002). A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(12), 1851–1877. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00057-7
Labov, W., and Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.
Lê, K., Coelho, C., Mozeiko, J., Krueger, F., and Grafman, J. (2011). Measuring goodness of story narratives: Implications for traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 25(6–7), 748–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2010.539696
Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lock, S., Wilkinson, R., Bryan, K., Maxim, J., Edmundson, A., Bruce, C., and Moir, D. (2001). Supporting partners of people with aphasia in relationships and conversation (SPPARC). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36(suppl. 1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820109177853
Mann, K., Power, E., Barnes, S., and Togher, L. (2015). Questioning in conversations before and after communication partner training for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 29(9), 1082–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1035226
Marlaire, C. L., and Maynard, D. W. (1990). Standardized testing as an interactional phenomenon. Sociology of Education, 83–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112856
Marlaire, C. L., and Maynard, D. W. (1993). Social problems and the organization of talk and interaction. In J. A. Holstein and G. Miller (Eds.), Reconsidering social constructionism: Debates in social problems theory (pp. 173–198). New York: Aldine de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315128153-9
Maynard, D. W., and Marlaire, C. L. (1992). Good reasons for bad testing performance: The interactional substrate of educational exams. Qualitative Sociology, 15(2), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00989493
McDonald, S., Togher, L., and Code, C. (2014a). Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. London: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203557198
McDonald, S., Togher, L., and Code, C. (2014b). The nature of cognitive deficits and psychosocial function following traumatic brain injury. In S. McDonald, L. Togher, and Code, C. (Eds.), Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. London: Psychology Press.
Mehan, H. (1979). ‘What time is it, Denise?’: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 18(4), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846
Middleton, D., and Brown, S. D. (2005). The social psychology of experience: Studies in remembering and forgetting. London: Sage.
Mikesell, L. (2009). Conversational practices of a frontotemporal dementia patient and his interlocutors. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(2), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810902864552
Mondada, L. (2013). The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch3
Piolino, P., Desgranges, B., Manning, L., North, P., Jokic, C., and Eustache, F. (2007). Autobiographical memory, the sense of recollection and executive functions after severe traumatic brain injury. Cortex, 43(2), 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70474-X
Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a ‘fishing’ device. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00020.x
Raymond, G., and Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35(5), 677–705. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 161–216. https://doi.org/10.1086/230911
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
Sidnell, J. (2013). Basic conversation analytic methods. in J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001
Stivers, T. (2005). Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(2), 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1
Stivers, T. (2013). Sequence organization. In J. Sidnell and T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch10
Stivers, T., and Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060179
Stivers, T., Mondada, L., and Steensig, J. (2011). Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, and J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 3–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002
Stracciari, A., Ghidoni, E., Guarino, M., Poletti, M., and Pazzaglia, P. (1994). Post-traumatic retrograde amnesia with selective impairment of autobiographical memory. Cortex, 30(3), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80341-3
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., McLachlan, D. R., and Moscovitch, M. (1988). Priming of semantic autobiographical knowledge: A case study of retrograde amnesia. Brain and Cognition, 8(1), 3–20.
Turkstra, L. S., Williams, W. H., Tonks, J., and Frampton, I. (2008). Measuring social cognition in adolescents: Implications for students with TBI returning to school. NeuroRehabilitation, 23(6), 501–509. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2008-23606
Vakil, E., Biederman, Y., Liran, G., Groswasser, Z., and Aberbuch, S. (1994). Head-injured patients and control group: Implicit versus explicit measures of frequency of occurrence. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16(4), 539–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639408402665
Van Vreeswijk, M. F., and de Wilde, E. J. (2004). Autobiographical memory specificity, psychopathology, depressed mood and the use of the Autobiographical Memory Test: A meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(6), 731–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00194-3
Wagoner, B., and Gillespie, A. (2014). Sociocultural mediators of remembering: An extension of Bartlett’s method of repeated reproduction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(4), 622–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12059
Wilkinson, R. (2014). Conversation analysis. In M. J. Bal, N. Müller, and R. L. Nelson (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in communication disorders (pp. 101–114). New York, London: Psychology Press.
