Understanding mechanisms of change after conversation-focused therapy in aphasia

A conversation analysis investigation

Authors

  • Jamie H Azios Lamar University
  • Brent E Archer Bowling Green State University
  • Jaime B Lee James Madison University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.21043

Keywords:

aphasia, stroke, conversation, treatment, intervention, qualitative

Abstract

Objective: Conversation therapy in aphasia is a complex but effective type of intervention aimed at changing the linguistic and non-linguistic behaviors of persons with aphasia and/or their conversational partners. Recent studies have examined the experimental effects of conversation-based intervention and found significant change in targeted conversation strategies used by people with aphasia during therapy contexts. This investigation examines the generalization of therapy effects to naturally occurring conversations outside therapy.

Method: The current study uses a conversation analysis framework to examine the generalization of this change to conversations between a person with aphasia and their spouse.

Results: Conversation analysis revealed changes in the sequential environment of various strategies that were targeted in conversation-based intervention. Most notably, there was a change in the flexibility and deployment of gesture type and the act of writing as a means of achieving mutual understanding.

Discussion: This study adds to the growing body of evidence supporting conversation-based interventions. Qualitative analysis of conversation provides important information on a client’s response to intervention and the generalization of targeted strategies to everyday contexts.

Conclusion: Given the nature of complex, collaborative, and unplanned conversation, qualitative approaches allow clinicians and researchers to better understand why clients deploy strategies of interest at various junctures. These types of analyses are vital for understanding if and how meaningful life participation is achieved after skilled intervention.

Author Biographies

  • Jamie H Azios, Lamar University

    Jamie H. Azios, PhD, CCC-SLP is an associate professor in the Speech and Hearing Sciences Department at Lamar University. She has expertise in using qualitative research methodologies to examine the perspectives and interactions of adults with neurogenic communication disorders in various social contexts. Her research interests include co-constructed conversation in aphasia and the impact of communicative environments on social participation and inclusion. She has published articles related to client centeredness, the interactional environments of long-term care facilities, and therapist and client behaviors during social approaches to aphasia intervention. She is an inaugural Tavistock Trust for Aphasia Distinguished Scholar.

  • Brent E Archer, Bowling Green State University

    Brent E. Archer hails from Johannesburg, South Africa. After completing a degree in speech-language pathology and audiology at the University of the Witwatersrand in 2006, Brent worked as a speech-language pathologist and audiologist at rural hospitals, clinics, schools, and kindergartens in the Free State province of South Africa. In 2012, he entered the applied languages and speech sciences PhD program at the University of Louisiana, Lafayette. In his dissertation, Brent used a number of frameworks (systemic functional linguistics, CA, cognitive ethnography) to study facilitated conversation groups for people with aphasia. He was interested in understanding how groups of people with mild to
    severe language deficits were able to use each other and resources in the environment to remain effective, competent communicators. In 2016, he obtained his PhD from the University of Louisiana, Lafayette. After graduating, he was appointed as an assistant professor in communication disorders and sciences at Bowling Green State University. Brent’s research interests include aphasiology and bilingualism in clinical populations. In 2020, Brent was chosen as a Tavistock Aphasia Distinguished Scholar.

  • Jaime B Lee, James Madison University

    Jaime B. Lee, PhD, CCC-SLP, is an assistant professor in the Communication Sciences and Disorders Department at James Madison University. She teaches courses in the areas of neurogenic communication disorders and is engaged in clinical research focused on adults with chronic aphasia. She has published on topics such as attention and aphasia, computer-based treatments for aphasia, aphasia group facilitation, and single-case experimental design.

References

Archer, B., Azios, J. H., Tetnowski, J., Damico, J., Freer, J. C., …, and Christou-Franklin, E. (2019). Key wording practices in three aphasia conversation groups: A preliminary study. Aphasiology, 33(10), 1248–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1630596

Azios, J. H., Archer, B., and Lee, J. B. (2021). Detecting behavioural change in conversation: Procedures and preliminary data. Aphasiology, 35(7), 961–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1812031

Beeke, S., Maxim, J., and Wilkinson, R. (2007). Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-970571

Beeke, S., Maxim, J., Best, W., and Cooper, F. (2011). Redesigning therapy for agrammatism: Initial findings from the ongoing evaluation of a conversation-based intervention study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24(2), 222–236.

Beeke, S., Johnson, F., Beckley, F., Heilemann, C., Edwards, S., …, and Best, W. (2014). Enabling better conversations between a man with aphasia and his conversation partner: Incorporating writing into turn taking. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(3), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.925667

Beeke, S., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., Heilemann, C., Edwards, S., …, and Best, W. (2015). Conversation focused aphasia therapy: Investigating the adoption of strategies by people with agrammatism. Aphasiology, 29(3), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.881459

Beeke, S., Sirnam, M., Beckley, F., Maxim, J., Edwards, S., …, and Swinburn, K. (2018). Better conversations with aphasia: A learning resource. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/short-courses/search-courses/better-conversations-aphasia-e-learning-resource

Beeson, P. M., and Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review, 16(4), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-006-9013-7

Bernstein-Ellis, E., and Elman, R. (2007). Aphasia group communication treatment: The Aphasia Center of California approach. In R. J. Elman (Ed.), Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders: The expert clinician’s approach (2nd ed., pp. 71–94). San Diego: Plural Publishing.

Best, W., Maxim, J., Heilemann, C., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., …, and Beeke, S. (2016). Conversation therapy with people with aphasia and conversation partners using video feedback: A group and case series investigation of changes in interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00562

Boles, L. (2011). A review of aphasia couples therapy. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 14(3), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1179/jslh.2011.14.3.159

Booth, S., and Perkins, L. (1999). The use of conversation analysis to guide individualized advice to carers and evaluate change in aphasia: A case study. Aphasiology, 13(4–5), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399402109

Bruner, J. S., and Anglin, J. M. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. New York: W. W. Norton.

Busk, P. L., and Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single participant research. In T. R. Kratochwill and J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cunningham, R., and Ward, C. (2003). Evaluation of a training programme to facilitate conversation between people with aphasia and their partners. Aphasiology, 17(8), 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030344000184

Damico, J., Tetnowski, J., Lynch, K., Hartwell, J., Weill, C., …, and Simmons-Mackie, N. (2015). Facilitating authentic conversation: An intervention employing principles of constructivism and conversation analysis. Aphasiology, 29(3), 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.945388

Eggins, S., and Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Goodwin, C. (2000). Gesture, aphasia, and interaction. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 84–98). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.006

Goodwin, C. (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: The social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.151

Goodwin, C. (2010). Constructing meaning through prosody in aphasia. In D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, and M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in interaction (pp. 373–394). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.29goo

Goodwin, C., and Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19(1), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435

Holland, A., Frattali, C., and Fromm, D. (1999). Communication activities of daily living (2nd ed.). Austin: Pro-Ed.

Hopper, T., Holland, A., and Rewega, M. (2002). Conversational coaching: Treatment outcomes and future directions. Aphasiology, 16(7), 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030244000059

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001

Hutchins, E. (2006). The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. In N. J. Enfield and S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 375–398). Oxford: Berg. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135517-19

Kagan, A. (1998). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: Methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology, 12(9), 816–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249575

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.1.07ken

Kertesz, A. (2007). Western Aphasia Battery (revised). San Antonio: Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1037/t15168-000

Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., …, and Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Washington D. C. What Works Clearinghouse.

Leaman, M. C., and Edmonds, L. A. (2020). ‘By the way’… How people with aphasia and their communication partners initiate new topics of conversation. American Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 29(1S), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0198

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243

Schegloff, E. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield and S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 70–96). Oxford: Berg. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135517-4

Schiffrin, D. (2001). Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 54–75). Malden: Blackwell Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch4

Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, A., Armstrong, E., Holland, A., and Cherney, L. R. (2010). Communication partner training in aphasia: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(12), 1814–1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.026

Simmons-Mackie, N., Savage, M. C., and Worrall, L. (2014). Conversation therapy for aphasia: A qualitative review of the literature. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49(5), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12097

Swabey, D., and Booth, S. (1999). Group training in communication skills for carers of adults with aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/136828299247423

Swinburn, K., Porter, G., and Howard, D. (2004). The comprehensive aphasia test. Hove: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/t13733-000

Tetnowski, J. T., Tetnowski, J. A., and Damico, J. S. (2021). Patterns of conversation trouble source and repair as indices of improved conversation in aphasia: A multiple-case study using conversation analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(1S), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00100

Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Le Dorze, G., Cruice, M., …, and Gauvreau, C. A. (2017). Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(14), 1364–1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1194899

Wilkinson, R. (2010). Interaction-focused intervention: A conversation analytic approach to aphasia therapy. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 1(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v1i1.45

Wilkinson, R. (2015). Conversation and aphasia: Advances in analysis and intervention. Aphasiology, 29(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.974138

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

© Equinox Publishing Ltd.

For information regarding our Open Access policy, click here.

How to Cite

Azios, J. H., Archer, B. E., & Lee, J. B. (2022). Understanding mechanisms of change after conversation-focused therapy in aphasia: A conversation analysis investigation. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 13(2), 220–243. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.21043