The influence of context on identity construction after traumatic brain injury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.21020Keywords:
Identity, Systemic functional linguistics, traumatic brain injury, conversationAbstract
Objective: It has been widely accepted that positive identity construction after traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in better rehabilitation outcomes. However, there is limited information available on the linguistic resources that individuals use to construct such identities, and how the context in which they are communicating may influence this construction of self. This research uses the tools of systemic functional linguistics to examine the linguistic construction of identity in an individual with moderate-severe chronic TBI.
Method: The individual participated in two different conversations, one with a male stranger and the other with a female brain injury researcher, and the conversation transcripts were analyzed using tools of systemic functional linguistics.
Results: The identities communicated and linguistic construction of self in both contexts had many similarities. In both conversations, the participant presented a positive perspective of his post brain injury life, and he described similar relationships. Nevertheless, there were also noteworthy differences. With the stranger, he distanced himself from the topic of the injury by not discussing his pre-injury self or his injury-related difficulties. However, with the researcher, he contrasted a negative pre-injury persona with his current, improved post-injury self. Additionally, when conveying information about his relationships to the stranger he projected a more powerful and in-charge identity than with the researcher.
Discussion: An analysis of language using systemic functional linguistics can reveal important information about how individuals communicate their identity. Additionally, the identities communicated can be highly variable depending on the conversation partner, the context of the interaction, and sociocultural gender norms.
Conclusion: The results suggest that contextual influences on identity construction have important clinical implications for rehabilitation.
References
Beadle, E. J., Ownsworth, T., Fleming, J., and Shum, D. (2016). The impact of traumatic brain injury on self-identity: A systematic review of the evidence for self-concept changes. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 31(2), E12–E25. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000158
Body, R., and Parker, M. (2005). Topic repetitiveness after traumatic brain injury: An emergent, jointly managed behaviour. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19(5), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200400027189
Cloute, K., Mitchell, A., and Yates, P. (2008). Traumatic brain injury and the construction of identity. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(5/6), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010701306989
Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Eggins, S., and Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Fraas, M. R., and Calvert, M. (2009). The use of narratives to identify characteristics leading to a productive life following acquired brain injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0008)
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834
Halliday, M. A. K., and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781444146608
Harré, R., and van Langenhove, L. (1999). The dynamics of social episodes. In R. Harré and L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of international action (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Keegan, L. C., and McAdam, H. (2016). Swearing after traumatic brain injury: A linguistic analysis. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 7(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v7i1.21570
Keegan, L. C., Togher, L., Murdock, M., and Hendry, E. (2017). Expression of masculine identity in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 31(12), 1632–1641. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1332389
Kiernan, P. (2011). Evaluation and identity: Extending appraisal theory to explore positionings of self. Japanese Journal of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 6, 127–146.
Kiesling, S. F. (2005). Homosocial desire in men’s talk: Balancing and recreating cultural discourses of masculinity. Language in Society, 34, 695–726. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050268
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought (vol. 640). New York: Basic Books.
MacDonald, S. (2017). Introducing the model of cognitive-communication competence: A model to guide evidence-based communication interventions after brain injury. Brain Injury, 31(13–14), 1760–1780. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1379613
Mealings, M., and Douglas, J. (2010). ‘School’s a big part of your life …’: Adolescent perspectives of their school participation following traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment, 11, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1375/brim.11.1.1
Miller, J., and Iglesias, A. (2010). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT), instructional version 2010 [computer software]. Madison: SALT Software LLC.
Morris, S. D. (2004). Rebuilding identity through narrative following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Cognitive Rehabilitation, 22(2), 15–21.
Nochi, M. (1998). ‘Loss of self ’ in the narratives of people with traumatic brain injuries: A qualitative analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00211-6
Ownsworth, T. (2014). Neuropsychological rehabilitation: A modular handbook. Self-identity after brain injury. London and New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2013.857159
Sabat, S., and Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and the recovery of social identity. In R. Harré and L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 87–101). Oxford: Blackwell.
Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith Tools, version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
Togher, L. (2001). Discourse sampling in the 21st century. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(00)00045-9
Yeates, G., Henwood, K., Gracey, F., and Evans, J. (2007). Awareness of disability after acquired brain injury and the family context. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 17(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010600696423
Yeates, G. N., Gracey, F., and McGrath, J. C. (2008). A biopsychosocial deconstruction of ‘personality change’ following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(5/6), 566–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010802151532
Ylvisaker, M., and Feeney, T. (2000a). Reconstruction of identity after brain injury. Brain Impairment, 1(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1375/brim.1.1.12
Ylvisaker, M., and Feeney, T. (2000b). Reflections on Dobermanns, poodles, and social rehabilitation for difficult-to-serve individuals with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 14(4), 407–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870300401432
Ylvisaker, M., McPherson, K., Kayes, N., and Pellet, E. (2008). Metaphoric identity mapping: Facilitating goal setting and engagement in rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(5/6), 713–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010802201832
