Expectations and interpretations of conversations using aided communication
An application of relevance theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.20364Keywords:
Aided communication, Communication partners, Co-construction, Relevance theoryAbstract
Background: Reaching mutual understanding can sometimes be challenging in interactions involving communicators using aided communication. This explorative qualitative study offers insights into some of the features of utterance interpretation and meaning negotiation in interactions using graphic communication systems.
Method: Relevance theory was applied as a framework for analysis of conversations between a non-speaking child using a communication aid and her communication partners using natural speech.
Results: Through analysis of a series of videotaped conversations, several assumptions and contextual implications affecting the interpretation processes were identified. A tendency to organize interpretations according to contextual expectations and scripts emerged as a central explanatory factor in co-constructing meanings from available graphic utterances.
Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of understanding factors that may affect the interpretation processes of all participants in interactions involving aided communication.
References
Bloch, S., and Wilkinson, R. (2004). The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610400005614
Brekke, K. M., and von Tetzchner, S. (2003). Co-construction in graphic language development. In S. von Tetzchner and N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 176–210). London: Whurr/Wiley.
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603
Carston, R. (2015). Contextual adjustment of meaning. In N. Riemer (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of semantics (pp. 211–226). Abingdon: Routledge.
Clark, E. V. (2004.) Pragmatics and language acquisition. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 562–577). Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch25
Clarke, M., and Wilkinson, R. (2007). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 1: Organizing and understanding VOCA use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701390350
Clarke, M. T., Soto, G., and Nelson, K. (2017). Language learning, recasts, and interaction involving AAC: Background and potential for intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1278130
Collins, S. (1996). Referring expressions in conversations between aided and natural speakers. In S. von Tetzchner and M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 89–100). London: Whurr/Wiley.
Collins, S., and Marková, I. (1999). Interaction between impaired and unimpaired speakers: Inter-subjectivity and the interplay of culturally shared and situation specific knowledge. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164211
Cummings, L. (1998). The scientific reductionism of relevance theory: The lesson from logical positivism. Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00049-0
Fuller, D. R., Lloyd, L. L., and Stratton, M. M. (1997). Aided AAC symbols. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, and H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication. A Handbook of principles and practices (pp. 48–79). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Giora, R. (1997). Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00065-8
Hjelmquist, E., and Dahlgren Sandberg, A. (1996). Sounds and silence: Interaction in aided language use. In S. von Tetzchner and M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 137–152). London: Whurr/Wiley.
Hoag, L. A., Bedrosian, J. L., McCoy, K. F., and Johnson, D. E. (2008). Hierarchy of conversational rule violations involving utterance-based augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610802038288
Horn, L. R. (2004). Implicature. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631225485.2005.00003.x
Jacoby, S., and Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1
Jagoe, C. (2015). Collaborative meaning-making in delusional talk as a search for mutual manifestness: A relevance theory approach. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 6, 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v6i1.53
Jagoe, C., and Smith, M. M. (2016). Relevance in the context of multimodality and aided communication. In M. M. Smith and J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 229–246). Surrey: J&R Press.
Light, J. L. (2003). Shattering the silence. In J. L. Light., D. R. Beukelman, and J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC. From research to effective practice (pp. 3–38). Baltimore: Brookes.
Mayer-Johnson, R., Mayer-Watt, S., Cologne, A., and Bushen, T. (1993). The picture communication symbols: PCS book I and II combined. Solana Beach: Mayer-Johnson Co.
McCoy, K. F., Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L. A., and Johnson, D. E. (2007). Brevity and speed of message delivery trade-offs in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610600924515
Murray, J., Dahlgren Sandberg, A., Smith, M. M., Deliberato, D., Stadskleiv, K., and von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Communicating the unknown: Descriptions of pictured scenes and events presented on video by children and adolescents using aided communication and their peers using natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1420690
Nerlich, B., and Clarke, D. D. (2001). Ambiguities we live by: Towards a pragmatics of polysemy. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00132-0
Neuvonen, K. A., Launonen, K., Smith, M. M., and von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Extending and narrowing – developing ways of utilizing graphic symbols. Paper presented at the 18th Biennial Conference of ISAAC, July 23–26, Gold Coast, Australia.
Palisano, R. J., Rosenbaum, P., Walter, S., Russel, D., Wood, E., and Galuppi, B. (1997). Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 39, 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x
Porter, G., and Cafiero, J. M. (2009). Pragmatic Organization Dynamic Display (PODD) communication books: A promising practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1044/aac18.4.121
Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. Oxford: Wiley.
Smith, M. M. (2015). Language development of individuals who require aided communication: Reflections on state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 215–233. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1062553
Solomon-Rice, P., and Soto, G. (2011). Co-construction as a facilitative factor in supporting the personal narratives of children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32, 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740109354776
Soto, G., Hartmann, E., and Wilkins, D. P. (2006). Exploring the elements of narrative that emerge in the interactions between an 8-year-old child who uses an AAC device and her teacher. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610500431777
Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1995). Postface to the second edition of Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Sutton, A., Trudeau, N., Morford, J., Rios, M., and Poirier, M. A. (2010). Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols. Journal of Child Language, 37, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909009477
Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
von Tetzchner, S. (2015). The semiotics of aided language development. Cognitive Development, 36, 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.09.009
von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Introduction to the special issue on aided language processes, development and use: An international perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1422020
von Tetzchner, S., and Basil, C. (2011). Terminology and notation in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2011.610356
von Tetzchner, S., and Martinsen, H. (1996). Words and strategies: Conversations with young children who use aided language. In S. von Tetzchner and M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 65–88). London: Whurr/Wiley.
Wilson, D., and Sperber, D. (2002). Truthfulness and relevance. Mind, 111(443), 583–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/111.443.583
Wilson, D., and Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.
Wisenburn, B., and Higginbotham, D. J. (2009). Participant evaluations of rate and communication efficacy of an AAC application using natural language processing. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610902739876