Doing notes
Coordinating collaborative ideas development using inscribed objects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.33659Keywords:
Conversation Analysis, inscribed objects, institutional interaction, reflective practice, theatre rehearsalsAbstract
This study explores the use of inscribed objects developed during theatre rehearsals and used as a resource in the structuring of one particular diagnostic activity in the theatre, known to practitioners as ‘doing notes’. This activity denotes diagnostic discussions in theatre rehearsals where members gather to reflect on their staging, and come to an agreement on future courses of action. Observing how directors use annotated play-scripts and notepads as tools for coordinating the performers’ engagement in the analysis and discussions of the staged action, the study asks what role these inscribed objects have as resources for coordinating the interaction during these activities. The study uses a longitudinal data set of video-recorded theatre rehearsals, here concerning two theatre companies as they prepare to stage naturalistic dramas, both working from play-scripts. The analysis explores how members of the ensemble use the artefacts to identify the particular staged sequence and action that is being topicalized and adopt the relevant participation framework for attending to the feedback item; how the artefacts are used in occasioning transitions between different items of feedback; and how the director also uses the objects as a means to mitigate for the socially sensitive act of critiquing colleagues’ performance in a public arena. The findings demonstrate how members orient to such locally produced inscribed objects as relevant resources for the carrying out of diagnostic activities at the heart of the collaborative theatre project.
References
Asmuß, Birte (2008) Performance appraisal interviews: Preference organization in assessment sequences. Journal of Business Communication 45 (4): 408–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943608319382
Asmuß, Birte and Jan Svennevig (2009) Meeting talk: An introduction. Journal of Business Communication 46 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943608326761
Brouwer, Catherine E. and Jelle van Dijk (2011) Brainstorming: Talk and the representation of ideas and insights. In Jacob Buur (ed.) Participatory Innovation Conference [PIN-C 2011 Proceedings], 12–17. Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
Drew, Paul and John Heritage (eds) (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edson, Margaret (2000) Wit. London: Nick Hern.
Glenn, Phillip and Curtis LeBaron (2011) Epistemic authority in employment interviews: Glancing, pointing, touching. Discourse & Communication 5 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310390161
Goodwin, Charles (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
Goodwin, Charles (2003) Embedded context. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36 (4): 323–350.
Hazel, Spencer (2014) Cultivating objects in interaction: Visual motifs as meaning making practices in talk-in-interaction. In Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa (eds) Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, 169–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hazel, Spencer (2015) Acting, interacting, enacting: Representing medical practice in theatre performance. In Malene Kjær, Jens Lohfert Jørgensen and Anita Holm Riis (eds) Sundhed / Health, special issue of Akademisk Kvarter / Academic Quarter 2: 44–64.
Hazel, Spencer and Kristian Mortensen (2014) Embodying the institution: Object manipulation in developing interaction in study counselling meetings. Journal of Pragmatics 65: 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.016
Hazel, Spencer and Kristian Mortensen (2019) Designedly Incomplete Objects – materially constituted elicitation tools in classroom interaction. In Dennis Day and Johannes Wagner (eds) Objects, Bodies and Work Practice, 216–249. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788924535-012
Heath, Christian, Jon Hindmarsh and Paul Luff (2010) Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435385
Heritage, John (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511665868.020
Jefferson, Gail (1972) Side sequences. In David Sudnow (ed.) Studies in social interaction, 294–338. New York: Free Press.
Mikkola, Piia and Esa Lehtinen (2014) Initiating activity shifts through use of appraisal forms as material objects during performance appraisal interviews. In Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa (eds) Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, 57–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.03mik
Mondada, Lorenza (2008) Using video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: Videotaping institutional telephone calls. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9 (3): Article 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-9.3.1161
Mondada, Lorenza and Kimmo Svinhufvud (2016) Writing-in-interaction: Studying writing as a multimodal phenomenon in social interaction. Language and Dialogue 6 (1): 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.1.01mon
Mortensen, Kristian and Christina Lundsgaard (2011) Preliminary notes on ‘grooming the object’: The example of an architectural presentation. In Jacob Buur (ed.) Participatory Innovation Conference [PIN-C 2011 Proceedings], 91–96. Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
Ochs, Elinor, Patrick Gonzales and Sally Jacoby (1996) ‘When I come down I’m in the domain state’: Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretative activity of physicists. In Elenor Ochs, Emmanuel A. Schegloff and Sandra A. Thompson (eds) Interaction and Grammar, 328–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511620874.007
Pomerantz, Anita (1978) Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In Jim Shenkein (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, 79–112. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-623550-0.50010-0
Reza, Yasmina (2008) God of Carnage (acting edition). Translated by C. Hampton. New York: Dramatist’s Play Service.
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Elenor Ochs, Emmanuel A. Schegloff and Sandra A. Thompson (eds) Interaction and Grammar, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511620874.002
Streeck, Jürgen (2011) The changing meanings of things: Found objects and inscriptions in social interaction. In Jürgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin and Curtis LeBaron (eds) Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, 67–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404512000711
Streeck, Jürgen and Werner Kallmeyer (2001) Interaction by inscription. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00126-5
Streeck, Jürgen and Siri Mehus (2005) Microethnography: The study of practices. In Kristine L. Fitch and Robert E. Sanders (eds) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Svinhufvud, Kimmo and Sanna Vehviläinen (2013) Papers, documents, and the opening of an academic supervision encounter. Text &Talk 33 (1): 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0007
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
