The multifaceted nature of interaction in higher education
Reflections from a genre-based approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jmtp.23600Keywords:
English Medium Instruction (EMI), genre-based approach, teacher idiolect, teacher-student interaction factors, university interactionsAbstract
What do we understand by ‘communicative interaction’ in university settings? Most often, our approach is somewhat reductionist as we tend to envisage interactions confined to class time and particularly to the traditional teacher-led lecture. This article aims to provide a genre-based overview of the diverse communicative interactions that take place in higher education, of the actors and variables shaping them, and of the multiple areas for study and improvement that derive from such analysis. The insights it offers pursue fostering reflective teaching by helping lecturers and syllabus planners to respectively gain awareness and examine their communicative practices and the learning models proposed, which may emphasize certain transversal soft skills over others. The outcome of this study may open up fresh avenues of research within the frames of English medium instruction (EMI) and languages for specific purposes (LSP).
References
Airey, J. (2012). ‘I don’t teach language’. The linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in Sweden. AILA Review, 25, 64–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aila.25.05air
Arnbjörnsdóttir, B. (2020). English at the University of Iceland: Students’ perceptions and practices. In M. Kuteeva, K. Kaufhold and N. Hynninen (eds), Language perceptions and practices in multilingual universities (pp. 245–259). Palgrave Macmillan.
Awidi, I. T. and Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education, 128, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013
Basturkmen, H. and Shackleford, N. (2015). How content lecturers help students with language: An observational study of language-related episodes in interaction in first year accounting classrooms. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 87–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.08.001
Belcher, D. (2006). English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264514
Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. Continuum.
Bhatia, V. K. (2012). Interdiscursivity. In C. Berkenkotter, V. K. Bhatia and M. Gotti (eds), Insights into academic genres (pp. 47–65). Peter Lang.
Breeze, R. (2014). Identifying student needs in English-medium university courses. In R. Breeze, C. Llamas Sáiz, C. Martínez Pasamar and C. Tabernero Sala (eds), Integration of theory and practice in CLIL (pp. 143–159). Rodopi.
Breeze, R. and Sancho Guinda, C. (2022). Teaching English-medium instruction courses in higher education: A guide for non-native speakers. Bloomsbury.
Cambridge University Press (2020). Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus. Retrieved on 28 February 2023 from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/interaction
Chang, Y-Y. (2012). The use of questions by professors in lectures given in English: Influences of disciplinary cultures. English for Specific Purposes, 31(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.002
Corbett, J. (2022). An intercultural approach to English language teaching. Multilingual Matters.
Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2005). Adjusting a business lecture for an international audience: A case study. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.05.002
Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2007). The language of business studies lectures. John Benjamins.
Dafouz, E. and Smit, U. (2016). Towards a dynamic conceptual framework for English-medium education in multilingual university settings. Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu034
Dafouz, E. and Smit, U. (2020). Road mapping English medium education in the internationalised university. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dimova, S. (2021). Certifying lecturers’ English language skills for teaching in English-medium instruction programs in higher education. Asp. La revue du GERAS, 79, 29–47. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.7056
Dudley-Evans, T. and Johns, T. F. (1981). A team-teaching approach to lecture comprehension for overseas students. In T. Dudley-Evans and T. F. Johns (eds), The teaching of listening comprehension. British Council.
Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286–290. https://www.engr.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/drive/1g7mzNhke6ErAkNXsQlyxBsmkaR-m8oe-/1993-Secondtier.pdf
Flowerdew, J. and Miller, L. (1995). On the notion of culture in L2 lectures. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 345–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587628
Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2013). CLIL in higher education: Towards a multilingual language policy. Multilingual Matters.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. Basic Books.
Giménez Moreno, R. (2008). Impartir la clase en inglés. In I. Fortanet (ed.), Hablar inglés en la Universidad. Docencia e investigación (pp. 45–81). Septem Ediciones.
Gotti, M. (2008). Investigating specialised discourse. Peter Lang.
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S. and Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Han, Y. and Xu, Y. (2020). The development of student feedback literacy: The influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 680–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545
Hardt, D., Nagler, M. and Rincke, J. (2022). Can peer mentoring improve online teaching effectiveness? An RCT during the COVID-19 pandemic. Labour Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102220
Hyland, K. (2015). Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005
Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language: New models, new norms, new goals. Oxford University Press.
Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge University Press.
Jules, J. E. (2019). From teacher talk to student talk: Repositioning learners for success in the language classroom. In P. J. Feraria (ed.), English language teaching in a post-method paradigm (pp. 107–139). IGI Global.
Klaasen, R. and De Graaf, E. (2001). Facing innovation: Preparing lectures for English-medium instruction in a non-native context. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790110054409
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Ablex.
Leung, C. and Street, B. V. (eds) (2012). English: A changing medium of instruction. Multilingual Matters.
Martin, J. R. (1993). Genre and literacy: Modeling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002440
Mason, A. (1994). By dint of: Student and lecturer perceptions of lecture comprehension strategies in first-term graduate study. In J. Flowerdew (ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 199–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox.
Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I. and McGillicuddy, K. (1996). Explaining science in the classroom. Open University Press.
Oxford University Press (2022). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Retrieved on 28 February 2023 from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/interaction
Potts, J. (2013). Idiolects, teacher personality and more. Modern Language Teacher, 83.
https://www.modernenglishteacher.com/issue-83-idiolects-teacher-personality-and-more
Sailer, M. and Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
Salehzadeh, J. (2006). Academic listening strategies: A guide to understanding lectures. University of Michigan Press.
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (1991). Topic confusion in English–Asian discourse. World Englishes, 10, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1991.tb00145.x
Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. and Feak, C. B. (2000). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. University of Michigan Press.
Tardy, C. M. (2016). Beyond convention: Genre innovation in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
Trimble, L. (1985). English for science and technology: A discourse approach. Cambridge University Press.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2010). News genres. In R. Wodak and V. Koller (eds), Handbook of communication in the public sphere (pp. 345–362). De Gruyter Mouton.
Vela Tafalla, M. A. (2022). Spoken genres and the role of intonation in research communication in English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Zaragoza.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Wilkinson, R. (2017). Trends and issues in English-medium instruction in Europe. In K. Ackerlay, M. Guarda and F. Helm (eds), Sharing perspectives on English-medium instruction (pp. 35–75). Peter Lang.
