Some comments on the concept of conversational history
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.33345Keywords:
conversational history, conversational units, interior dialogization of discourse, silence, monoglossyAbstract
The article attempts to evaluate the theoretical importance and the explicative power of the concept of conversational history. From a theoretical viewpoint it complements, at a different level, Bakhtin’s concept of interior dialogization of discourse. It proved its efficiency mainly in the analysis of litterary texts.
References
Bahtin (Bakhtin), M. M. (1982) Probleme de literatur? ?i estetic? [Problems of literature and esthetics]. Bucharest: Univers.
Bloom, M. E. (1996) Les silences de Maeterlinck et Sarraute. In S. Golopen?ia (ed.) Les propos spectacle. Études de pragmatique théâtrale 209–229. New York, Washington, DC, and Baltimore: Peter Lang.
Edmondson, W. (1981) Spoken discourse: A model for analysis. London and New York: Longman.
Golopen?ia, S. (1980) L’histoire conversationnelle. Revue roumaine de linguistique 25(5): 499–503.
Golopen?ia, S. (ed.) (1996) Les propos spectacle. Études de pragmatique théâtrale. New York, Washington, DC, and Baltimore: Peter Lang.
Ionescu-Rux?ndoiu, L. (ed.) (2002) Interac?iunea verbal? în limba român? actual? [Verbal interaction in present-day Romanian]. Bucharest: Editura Universit??ii din Bucure?ti.
Ionescu-Rux?ndoiu, L. (2014) Voix et intertextualité dans le théâtre de l’absurde. Étude de cas: E. Ionesco, La cantatrice chauve. Revue roumaine de linguistique 59(3): 259–266.
Ionescu-Rux?ndoiu, L. (2016) Keep silent or keep talking! Remarks on silence in Romanian culture. Language and Dialogue 6(3): 447–463.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1990) Les interactions verbales. Tome I. Paris: Armand Colin.
Kurzon, D. (2007) Towards a typology of silence. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1673–1688.
Mey, J. L. (1999) When voices clash: A study of literary pragmatics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traverso, V. (1996) La conversation familière. Analyse pragmatique des interactions. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
Vion, R. (1992) La communication verbale. Analyse des interactions. Paris: Hachette.
Bloom, M. E. (1996) Les silences de Maeterlinck et Sarraute. In S. Golopen?ia (ed.) Les propos spectacle. Études de pragmatique théâtrale 209–229. New York, Washington, DC, and Baltimore: Peter Lang.
Edmondson, W. (1981) Spoken discourse: A model for analysis. London and New York: Longman.
Golopen?ia, S. (1980) L’histoire conversationnelle. Revue roumaine de linguistique 25(5): 499–503.
Golopen?ia, S. (ed.) (1996) Les propos spectacle. Études de pragmatique théâtrale. New York, Washington, DC, and Baltimore: Peter Lang.
Ionescu-Rux?ndoiu, L. (ed.) (2002) Interac?iunea verbal? în limba român? actual? [Verbal interaction in present-day Romanian]. Bucharest: Editura Universit??ii din Bucure?ti.
Ionescu-Rux?ndoiu, L. (2014) Voix et intertextualité dans le théâtre de l’absurde. Étude de cas: E. Ionesco, La cantatrice chauve. Revue roumaine de linguistique 59(3): 259–266.
Ionescu-Rux?ndoiu, L. (2016) Keep silent or keep talking! Remarks on silence in Romanian culture. Language and Dialogue 6(3): 447–463.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1990) Les interactions verbales. Tome I. Paris: Armand Colin.
Kurzon, D. (2007) Towards a typology of silence. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1673–1688.
Mey, J. L. (1999) When voices clash: A study of literary pragmatics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traverso, V. (1996) La conversation familière. Analyse pragmatique des interactions. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
Vion, R. (1992) La communication verbale. Analyse des interactions. Paris: Hachette.
Published
2018-11-06
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, L. (2018). Some comments on the concept of conversational history. Sociolinguistic Studies, 12(1), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.33345
