A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of amplifiers in British English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v1i2.241Keywords:
amplifier, intensifier, gender and language, British English, corpusAbstract
Amplifiers such as ‘very’, ‘so’, ‘absolutely’ and ‘totally’ are a common type of intensifiers in the English language. While earlier studies have explored the meaning and grammar of amplifiers, as well as their connection with sociolinguistic variables, notably genre categories, few have explored extralinguistic parameters on the basis of substantive corpus data. In this article we use the British National Corpus (BNC), the largest balanced corpus of British English available today, to explore variations in the use of amplifiers in terms of a wide range of sociolinguistic variables. Specifically, we examine 33 amplifiers across the following dimensions: discourse mode and register, gender, age, education level, audience gender and age, as well as publication date. Our results paint a complex picture. Some tendencies are clear, for example, amplifiers are more common in speech than in writing, higher levels of education correlate positively with higher frequencies of use, and there is an overall decrease in the use of amplifiers over an intervening thirty year period. However, other areas merely defy simple generalizations. For example, gender differences between men and women vary from speaking to writing, so do the differences among individual amplifiers and among age groups. Our results raise interesting issues pertaining to both traditional sociolinguistic concerns and the emerging field of corpus linguistics.
References
Argyle, M. (1994) The Psychology of Social Class. London: Routledge.
Aston, G. and Burnard, L. (1998) The BNC Handbook. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bauer, L. and Bauer, W. (2002) Adjective boosters in the English of young New Zealanders. Journal of English Linguistics 30(3): 244–57.
Bell, A. (1984) Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13: 145–204.
Bell, A. (1997) Language style as audience design. In N. Coupland and A. Jaworski (eds) Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook 240–50. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Bell, A. (2001) Back in style: Reworking audience design. In P. Eckert and J. Rickford (eds) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation 139–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D. (2000) Historical change in the language use of women and men: Gender differences in dramatic dialogue. Journal of English Linguistics 28(1): 21–37.
Biber, D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S. and Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Black, M. and Coward, R. (1981/1998) Linguist, social and sexual relations: A review of Dale Spender’s Man Made Language. Screen Education 39: 69–85. Reproduced in D. Cameron (ed. 1998) The Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader 100–18. London and New York: Routledge.
Bolinger, D. (1972) Degree Words. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
Bradac, J. and Mulac, A. (1984) A molecular view of powerful and powerless speech styles: Attributional consequences of specific language features and communicator intentions. Communication Monographs 51: 307–19.
Bradac, J., Mulac A. and Thompson S. (1995) Men’s and women’s use of intensifiers and hedges in problem-solving interaction: Molar and molecular analyses. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(2): 93–116.
Bradac, J., Schneider, M., Hemphill, M. and Tardy, C. (1980) Consequences of language intensity and compliance-gaining strategies in an initial heterosexual encounter. In H. Giles, W. Robinson and P. Smith (eds) Language: Social Psychological Perspectives 71–5. Oxford: Pergamon.
Buchstaller, I. (2006) Diagnostics of age-graded linguistic behaviour. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(1): 3–30.
Burgoon, M. and Stewart, D. (1974) Empirical investigations of language intensity. Human Communication Research 1: 244–8.
Carli, L. (1990) Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 941–51.
Cheshire, J. (1987) Age and generation-specific use of language. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar and K. Mattheier (eds) Sociolinguistics: An Introductory Handbook of the Science of Language and Society 760–7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Coupland, N. and Coupland, J. (2001) Language, ageing, and ageism. In W. Robinson and H. Giles (eds) The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology 465–86. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Drescher, N. (2003) The relationships among gender, power, and register in the American academic community. Paper presented at the international conference of Perception and Realization in Language and Gender Research. 19–20 July, Michigan State University.
Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. (eds) (2001) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erickson, B., Lind, E., Johnson, B. and O’Barr, W. (1978) Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of ‘powerful’ and ‘powerless’ speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14: 266–79.
Evert, S. and Hoffmann, S. (2006) BNCweb (CQP-edition). Software demonstration presented at the ICAME 2006 Conference. 24–28 May, University of Helsinki.
Fahy, P. (2002) Use of linguistic qualifiers and intensifiers in a computer conference. The American Journal of Distance Education 16(1): 5–22.
Fries, C. (1940) American English Grammar. New York: Appleton, Century, Crofts.
Giles, H. and Coupland, N. (1991) Language: Contexts and Consequences. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Giles, H. and Powesland, P. (1975) Speech Style and Social Evaluation. London: Academic Press.
Guiller, J. and Durndell, A. (2006) ‘I totally agree with you’: Gender interactions in educational online discussion groups. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22: 368–81.
Holmes, J. (2001) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman.
Hosman, L. (1989) The evaluative consequences of hedges, hesitations, and intensifiers: Powerful and powerless speech styles. Human Communication Research 15(3): 383–406.
Hübler, A. (1983) Understatements and Hedges in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hundt, M., Sand, A. and Siemund, R. (1998) Manual of Information to Accompany the Freiburg-LOB Corpus of British English (‘FLOB’). Freiburg: University of Freiburg.
Ito, R. and Tagliamote, S. (2003) Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32: 257–79.
Jespersen, O. (1922) Language: Its nature, Development, and Origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Janssen, A. and Murachver, T. (2004) The relationship between gender and topic in gender-preferential language use. Written Communication 21(4): 344–67.
Johansson, S., Leech, G. and Goodluck, H. (1978) Manual of Information to Accompany the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English, for Use with Digital Computers. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Kennedy, G. (2003) Amplifier collocations in the British National Corpus: Implications for English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 37(3): 467–87.
Krauss, R. and Chiu, C. (1997) Language and social behaviour. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindsey (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2) 41–88. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Lakoff, R. (1973) Language and women’s place. Language in Society 2: 45–80.
Lakoff, R. (1975) Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
Lakoff, R. (1990) Talking Power. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, R. and Bucholtz, M. (2004) Language and Woman’s Place. Text and Commentaries (Revised and expanded edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lawton, D. (1968) Social Class, Language and Education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Lee, D. (2001) Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning & Technology 5(3): 37–72.
Macaulay, R. (1976) Social class and language in Glasgow. Language in Society 5: 173–88.
Macaulay, R. (2005) Talk That Counts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McEnery, T. and Xiao, R. (2004) Swearing in modern British English: The case of fuck in the BNC. Language and Literature 13(3): 235–68.
McEnery, T., Xiao, R. and Tono, Y. (2006) Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London and New York: Routledge.
McEwen, W. and Greenberg, B. (1970) Effects of message intensity on receiver evaluations of source, message, and topic. Journal of Communication 20: 340–50.
Mizokami, Y. (2001) Does ‘women’s language’ really exist? A critical assessment of sex difference research in sociolinguistics. Multicultural Studies 1: 141–59.
Mizokami, Y. (2003) Ambiguous boundary between women’s and men’s speech in the Japanese language in the use of polite expressions. Studia Linguistica 16: 105–26.
Mulac, A., Wiemann, J., Widenmann, S. and Gibson, T. (1988) Male/female language differences and effects in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: The gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs 55: 315–35.
Mustanoja, T. (1960) A Middle English Syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Newcombe, N. and Arnkoff, D. (1979) Effects of speech style and sex of speaker on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 1293–303.
Paradis, C. (2000) It’s well weird. Degree modifiers of adjectives revisited: The nineties. In J. Kirk (ed.) Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English 147–60. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
Partington, A. (2004) ‘Utterly content in each other’s company’: Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1): 131–56.
Pennebaker, J., Mehl, M. and Niederhoffer, K. (2003) Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 547–77.
Poynton, C. (1990) The privileging of representation and the marginalising of the interpersonal: A metaphor (and more) of contemporary gender relations. In T. Threadgold and A. Cranny-Francis (eds) Feminine/Masculine and Representation 231–40. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Precht, K. (2002) Gender differences in affect, evidentiality, and hedging in American conversation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America. 3–6 January, San Francisco.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rayson, P. and Garside, R. (2000) Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. In A. Kilgarriff and T. Berber-Sardinha (eds) Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora 1–6. 1–8 October, Hong Kong.
Recski, L. (2004) ‘It’s really ultimately very cruel…’: Contrasting English intensifier collocations across EFL writing and academic spoken discourse’. DELTA 20(2): 211–34.
Singh, S. (2005) Like, that’s so girl talk. The Manitoban Online 93(3). Retrieved on 12 April 2007 from http://themanitoban.com/2005–2006/0921/626.like.thats.so.girl.talk.php
Stenström, A. (1999) He was really gormless – She’s bloody crap: Girls, boys and intensifiers. In H. Hasselgård and S. Okesfjell (eds) Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson 69–78. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
Stenström, A., Andersen, G. and Hasund, I. (2002) Trends in Teenage Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stoffel, C. (1901) Intensifiers and Downtoners. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Stubbs, M. (1999) Society, education and language: The last 2,000 (and the next 20?) years of language teaching. Plenary lecture given at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics. 16–18 September, University of Edinburgh.
Swann, J. (1992) Girls, Boys and Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tagliamonte, S. and Roberts, C. (2005) So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series ‘Friends’. American Speech 80: 280–300.
Vasilieva, I. (2004) Gender-specific use of boosting and hedging adverbs in English computer-related texts – a corpus-based study. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language, Politeness and Gender. 2–5 September, University of Helsinki.
