A review and synthesis of research on comprehension of the masculine as a generic form in English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v4i2.427Keywords:
masculine generic, sexist language, pronoun resolutionAbstract
In this article we survey studies providing empirical tests of questions related to the comprehension of masculine generics; these are categorized by experimental paradigm. Findings are aggregated and weighted Stouffer combined tests are performed to assess the probabilities of the findings across studies. The evidence indicates that not only are masculine forms more likely to lead to male-oriented than to other responses, but also that this tendency is strongly evidenced in both children and adults, and that females are more likely than males to interpret masculine forms generically (p .00001 for each combined test). The evidence is mixed on whether sex-neutral or sex-inclusive forms provoke more generic interpretation, but may favor the inclusive forms. Many children, and 10% or more of adults tested, were unable to explain the masculine generic rule satisfactorily. Processing time studies indicate that a male-related response is more cognitively available than other responses following a masculine generic antecedent. Finally, there is a residual tendency to make male-oriented responses regardless of the stimulus.
References
Banaji, M.R. & C.D. Hardin (1996). “Automatic stereotyping”. Psychological Science 7, 136-41.
Baron, D.E. (1981). “The epicene pronoun: The word that failed”. American Speech 56, 83-97.
Baron, D.E. (1986). Grammar and gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bodine, A. (1975). “Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar”. Language in Society 4, 129-46.
Bucholtz, M., A.C. Liang & L.A. Sutton (eds.) (1999). Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cameron, D. (1998). “Gender, language, and discourse: A review essay”. Signs 23, 945-73.
Carreiras, M., A. Garnham, J. Oakhill & K. Cain (1996). “The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 49A, 639-63.
Cole, C.M., F.A. Hill & L.J. Dayley (1983). “Do masculine pronouns used generically lead to thoughts of men?”. Sex Roles 9, 737-49.
Cooper, R.L. (1984). “The avoidance of androcentric generics”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 50, 5-20.
Crawford, M. & L. English (1984). “Generic versus specific inclusion of women in language: Effects on recall”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 13, 373-81.
DeStefano, J.S. (1978/79). “Sex differences in language: A cross-national perspective with emphasis on English”. Language Sciences 1, 316-24.
DeStefano, J.S., M.W. Kuhner & H.B. Pepinsky (1978). “An investigation of referents of selected sex-indefinite terms in English”. Paper presented at the Ninth World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala.
Doleschal, U. & S. Schmid (2001). “Doing gender in Russian: Structure and perspective”. In M. Hellinger & H. Bussmann (eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (Vol. 1). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 253-82.
Eberhart, O.M.Y. (1977). “Elementary students’ understanding of certain masculine and neutral generic nouns” (Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International 37, 4113A-14A.
Ehrlich, S. & R. King (1992). “Gender-based language reform and the social construction of meaning”. Discourse and Society 3, 151-66.
Foertsch, J. & M.A. Gernsbacher (1997). “In search of gender neutrality: Is singular they a cognitively efficient substitute for generic he?”. Psychological Science 8, 106-11.
Friederici, A.D. & T. Jacobsen (1999). “Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28, 467-84.
Gastil, J. (1990). “Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics”. Sex Roles 23, 629-43.
Gathercole, V.C. (1989). “The acquisition of sex-neutral uses of masculine forms in English and Spanish”. Applied Psycholinguistics 10, 401-27.
Gelb, S. (1989). “Language and the problem of male salience in early childhood classroom environments”. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 4, 205-15.
Hamilton, M.C. (1988). “Using masculine generics: Does generic he increase male bias in user’s imagery?”. Sex Roles 19, 785-99.
Hamilton, M.C. (1991). “Masculine bias in the attribution of personhood: People = male, male = people”. Psychology of Women Quarterly 15, 393-402.
Hamilton, M.C. (1997). “The huwom race: Sexist language as a tool of dominance”. In F. Braun & U. Pasero (eds.), Kommunikation von geschlecht [Communication of Gender]. Kiel: Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Fravenforschung der Christian-Albrechts, Universität zu Kiel, 147-63.
Hamilton, M.C. & N.M. Henley (1982). “Detrimental consequences of generic masculine usage”. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Sacramento, CA.
Harrison, L. (1975). “Cro-Magnon woman –In eclipse”. Science Teacher 42(4), 9-11.
Harrison, L. & R.N. Passero (1975). “Sexism in the language of elementary school textbooks”. Science and Children 12(4), 22-25.
Heise, E. (2000). “Sind Frauen mitgemeint? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Verstaendnis des generischen Maskulinums und seiner Alternativen” [“Are women included? An empirical study of the generic masculine and its alternatives”]. Sprache & Kognition 19, 3-13.
Hellinger, M. & H. Bussmann (2001). Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (Vol. 1). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Henley, N.M. (1987). “This new species that speaks a new language: On sexism in language and language change”. In J. Penfield (ed.), Women and language in transition. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 3-27.
Henley, N.M. (1989). “Molehill or mountain? What we know and don’t know about the masculine as generic in English”. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag, 59-78.
Henley, N.M., M.C. Hamilton & B. Thorne (1984). “Womanspeak and manspeak: Sex differences and sexism in communication, verbal and non-verbal”. In A. Sergent (ed.), Beyond sex roles. Palo Alto, CA: West Publishing, 201-18.
Hyde, J.S. (1984). “Children’s understanding of sexist language”. Developmental Psychology 20, 697-706.
Jaworski, A. (1989). “On gender and sex in Polish”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 78, 83-92.
Khosroshahi, F. (1989). “Penguins don’t care, but women do: A social identity analysis of a Whorfian problem”. Language in Society 18, 505-25.
Kidd, V. (1971). “A study of images produced through the use of the male pronoun as the generic”. Moments in Contemporary Rhetoric and Communication 1(2), 25-30.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper & Row.
Livia, A. (2001). Pronoun envy: Literary uses of linguistic gender. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lozano, I. (1995). Lenguaje femenino, lenguaje masculino: ¿Condiciona nuestro sexo la forma de hablar?. Madrid : Minerva.
MacKay, D.G. (1980). “Psychology, prescriptive grammar and the pronoun problem”. American Psychologist 35, 444-49.
MacKay, D.G. & D.C. Fulkerson (1979). “On the comprehension and production of pronouns”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 661-73.
Martyna, W. (1978). “Using and understanding the generic masculine: A social-psychological approach to language and the sexes” (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1978). Dissertation Abstracts International 39, 3050B.
Martyna, W. (1980a). “Beyond the he/man approach: The case for nonsexist language”. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae & N.M. Henley (eds.), Language, gender and society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers, 25-37.
Martyna, W. (1980b). “The psychology of the generic masculine”. In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker & N. Furman (eds.), Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger, 69-78.
Meyers, M.W. (1990). “Current generic pronoun usage: An empirical study”. American Speech 65, 228-37.
Mosteller, F.M. & R.R. Bush (1954). “Selected quantitative techniques”. In G. Lindzey (ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, 289-334.
Moulton, J., G.M. Robinson & C. Elias (1978). “Sex bias in language use: “Neutral” pronouns that aren’t”. American Psychologist 33, 1032-36.
Ng, S.H. (1988). “Masculine generics and sexism in language”. Final report to the Social Sciences Research Fund Committee, Wellington.
Ng, S.H. (1990). “Androcentric coding of man and his in memory by language users”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 26, 455-64.
Nilsen, A.P. (1977). “Sexism in children’s books and elementary teaching materials”. In A.P. Nilsen, H. Bosmajian, H.L. Gershuny & J.P. Stanley (eds.), Sexism and language. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 161-79.
Noll, J.A. (1999). “Studies of epicene reference” (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International 60(3), 1324B.
Pauwels, A. (1998). Women changing language. London: Longman.
Romaine, S. (1999). Communicating gender. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosch, E. & C.B. Mervis (1975). “Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories”. Cognitive Psychology 7, 573-605.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. (Rev. ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Rothermund, K. (1998). “Automatische geschlechtsspezifische Assoziationen beim Lesen von Texten mit geschlechtseindeutigen und generisch maskulinen Textsubjekten” [“Automatic gender-specific associations during the reading of texts containing gender-specific and masculine generic text-subjects”]. Sprache & Kognition 17, 183-98.
Schaeffer, N.C. (1982). “A General Social Survey experiment in generic words”. Public Opinion Quarterly 46, 572-81.
Schneider, M.J. & S.L. Hacker (1973). “Sex role imagery and the use of the generic “man” in introductory texts”. American Sociologist 8(8), 12-18.
Schriefers, H. & J. Jescheniak (1999). “Representation and processing of grammatical gender in language production: A review”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28, 575-600.
Shimanoff, S.B. (1977). “Man = human: Empirical support for the Whorfian hypothesis”. Bulletin: Women’s Studies in Communication 1(2), 21-25.
Silveira, J. (1978). “Women on the fringes: Generic masculine words and their relation to thinking”. Unpublished manuscript.
Silveira, J. (1980). “Generic masculine words and thinking”. Women’s Studies International Quarterly 3, 165-78.
Sniezek, J.A. & C.H. Jazwinski (1986). “Gender bias in English: In search of fair language”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 16, 642-62.
Stouffer, S.A., E.A. Suchman, L.C. De Vinney, S.A. Star & R.M. Williams (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during life (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Switzer, J.Y. (1990). “The impact of generic word choices: An empirical investigation of age- and sex-related differences”. Sex Roles 22, 69-82.
Thorne, B. & N.M. Henley (eds.) (1975). Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
Wilson, E. & S.H. Ng, (1988). “Sex bias in visual images evoked by generics: A New Zealand study”. Sex Roles 18(3/4), 159-68.
Wilson, L.C. (1978). “Teachers’ inclusions of males and females in generic nouns”. Research in the Teaching of English 12, 155-61.
Wise, E. & J. Rafferty (1982). “Sex bias and language”. Sex Roles 8, 1189-96.
Wolf, F.M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
