Prosodic Weight Effect on Focal Accent of Standard Chinese
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rtcfl.27283Keywords:
focal accent, prosodic weight, information structureAbstract
This study investigates the phonetic performance of narrow information focus, as compared to broad focus, within different sentential positions of the Chinese Subject-Verb-Object (S+V+O) syntax structure. Three acoustic parameters of focus, including the pitch range ratio, duration ratio, and intensity ratio, were taken to explore the ranking among these parameters and to analyse the impact of focus position on their interrelationships. The results showed that (1) Chinese, as a tonal language, exhibits a prosodic ranking characterized by duration > pitch range > intensity; (2) Chinese speakers tend to emphasize verbs within the S+V+O syntax structure, particularly when verbs are positioned in the middle of sentences. The prosodic ranking observed was Fmiddle > Finitial > Ffinal; (3) Pitch range and duration display interdependence as acoustic parameters, whereas intensity stands as an independent parameter. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of phonetic nuances within Chinese prosody, shedding light on the intricate interplay between focus, syntax, and prosody.
References
Bolinger, D. (1972) Accent is predictable (if you’re a mind reader). Language 48: 633–644. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412039
Chen, A., Gussenhoven, C., and Rietveld, T. (2002) Language-specific uses of the effort code. In B. Bernard (ed.) Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, 215–218. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968) The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
Cooper, E., Eady, J., and Mueller, R. (1985) Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77 (6): 2142–2156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.392372
Croft, W. (2002) Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cruttenden, A. (2002) Intonation (2nd ed.). Beijing and Cambridge: Peking University Press and Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2004) A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (4th ed.). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Duanmu, S. (2007) Stress, information and language typology. Linguistic Sciences 6 (5): 3–16.
Eady, J. and Cooper, E. (1986) Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80 (2): 402–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.394091
Eady, J., Cooper, E., Klouda, V., Mueller, R., and Lotts, W. (1986) Acoustical characteristics of sentential focus: Narrow vs. broad and single vs. dual focus environments. Language and Speech 29 (3): 233–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002383098602900304
Face, L. (2003) Intonation in Spanish declaratives: Differences between lab speech and spontaneous speech. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 2: 115–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.46
Feng, S. L. (2021) Stylistic-register grammar and word stress in Chinese. Studies in Prosodic Grammar 8 (2): 77–111.
Firbas, J. (1992) Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fry, B. (1955) Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27 (4): 765–768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1908022
Fry, B. (1958) Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1 (2): 126–152.
Gao, M. M. (1993) An Experimental Study on the Prosodic Features of Stress in Mandarin Sentences. PhD thesis. Peking University, Beijing.
Greenberg, H. (1960) A method for measuring functional yield as applied to tone in African languages. In S. Richard (ed.) Report of the Tenth Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies, 7–16. Washington DC: Georgetown University.
Greenberg, H. (1966) Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.
Guo, J. (2023) The theories and development of studies on English stress. Journal of Tianjin University (Social Sciences) 25 (1): 70–78.
Gussenhoven, C. (1983) Focus, mode and the nucleus. Journal of Linguistics 19 (2): 377–417.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967) Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3 (2): 199–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700016613
Halliday, M. A. K. and Greaves, S. (2008) Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox Publishing.
Hockett, F. (1955) A Manual of Phonology. Baltimore, MD: Waverly Press.
Huang, J. W. (2019) The rhythmic representation of focal words at different positions in a declarative sentence. Chinese Learning 6: 103–112.
Hyman, M. (2015) Positional prominence vs. word accent: Is there a difference? UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report 11 (11): 86–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.5070/p717p5607t
Jia, Y. (2012) Phonetic Realization and Phonological Analysis of Focus in Standard Chinese. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Jun, S. A. and Jiang, X. (2019) Differences in prosodic phrasing in marking syntax vs. focus: Data from Yanbian Korean. The Linguistic Review 36 (1): 117–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2018-2009
Katz, J. and Selkirk, E. (2011) Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new: Evidence from phonetic prominence in English. Language 87 (4): 771–816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.2011.0076
Keyworth, R. (2014) A cross-linguistic study of lexical stress shifts in level 1 [+ cyclic] derivations. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 21: 060001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4875898
Kochanski, G., Grabe, E., Coleman, J., and Rosner, B. (2005) Loudness predicts prominence: Fundamental frequency lends little. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118 (2): 1038–1054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1923349
Koffi, E. and Mertz, G. (2018) Acoustic correlates of lexical stress in Central Minnesota English. Linguistic Portfolios 7 (1): Article 7.
Ladd, R. (1980) The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Lambrecht, K. (1996) Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, C., Wang, T., and Liberman, M. (2016) Production and perception of tone 3 focus in Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01058
Lian, S. N. (1993). A Comparative Study between English and Chinese. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Liberman, M. and Prince, A. (1977) On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8 (2): 249–336.
Liberman, Y. (1975) The Intonational System of English. PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Nespor, M. and Vogel, I. (1986) Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
O’Shaughnessy, D. and Allen, J. (1983) Linguistic modality effects on fundamental frequency in speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74 (4): 1155–1171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.390039
Qin, P. (2021) Intonation evidence in distinguishing information focus and contrastive focus in Chinese. Contemporary Linguistics 23 (1): 74–86.
Selkirk, O. (1984) Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
Sereno, A. and Jongman, A. (1995) Acoustic correlates of grammatical class. Language and Speech 38 (1): 57–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002383099503800103
Shen, J. X. (1999) Asymmetry and Markedness. Jiangxi: Jiangxi Education Press.
Shi, F. (2008) Phonological Pattern – The Intersection of Phonetics and Phonology. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Shi, F. (2009) Exploration of Experimental Phonology. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Shi, F. (2013) Intonation Pattern – The Cornerstone of Experimental Linguistics. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Shi, F. (2017) Intonation is the cornerstone of experimental linguistics – summary report of Intonation Forum. Experimental Linguistics 6 (1): 19–25, 62.
Shi, F. (2021) Prosodic Pattern – Phonetic and Semantic, Grammatical and Pragmatic Combination. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Shi, F. and Jiao, X. F. (2016) Analysis of the length and volume of Mandarin imperative intonation. Chinese Learning 1: 65–73.
Shi, F., Wang, P., and Liang, L. (2009) The fluctuation of the intonation of declarative sentences in Mandarin. Language Journal 2: 4–13.
Swerts, M., Krahmer, E., and Avesani, C. (2002) Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: A comparative analysis. Journal of Phonetics 30 (4): 629–654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2002.0178
Tian, Y. (2010) An analysis of the loudness of focus sentences in Beijing dialect. In The Ninth Phonetic Conference of China (PCC 2010). Tianjin.
Turk, E. and Sawusch, R. (1996) The processing of duration and intensity cues to prominence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99 (6): 3782–3790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.414995
Van der Hulst, H. (2002) Stress and accent. In L. Nadel (ed.) Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, 246–254. London: Nature Publishing Group.
Wen, B. Y. and Xie, C. W. (2018) Japanese learners match the rhythm of Chinese declarative intonation. Nankai Journal (Philosophy and Social Sciences edition) 4: 72–81.
Xu, L. (2004) Manifestation of informational focus. Lingua 114 (3): 277–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(03)00031-7
Xu, L. T. (2004) Different concepts of focus and their expressions in Chinese. Contemporary Linguistics 3: 5–18.
Xu, Y. (2005) Phonetic realisation of focus in English declarative intonation. Journal of Phonetics 33 (1): 159–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.001
Xu, Y. and Xu, C. X. (2005) Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. Journal of Phonetics 33 (2): 159–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.001
Zhang, H. (2016) Syntax-Phonology Interface. New York: Routledge.
Zhao, Y. G. (2016) The study on phonology-syntax interface. Foreign Language Teaching 4: 24–29.
Zubizarreta, L. (1998) Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
