Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Development of Spoken Chinese Textbooks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rtcfl.22909Keywords:
Systemic Functional Linguistics, Spoken Chinese, TextbookAbstract
More than ten thousand spoken Chinese textbooks have been published in the past three decades because of the rise of China and the increasing number of Chinese learners all over the world. None of these textbooks was developed by making reference to the theories of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) both in terms of overall design and the selection of teaching materials. Therefore, this article explores the possibility of developing spoken Chinese textbooks on the basis of SFL theories. There exist many studies in the field of systemic-functional approaches to Chinese, which provide a rich foundation for the analysis of spoken Chinese. Depending on the findings of previous research, the chapter applies the theories of SFL to the development of the spoken Chinese textbook. The chapter first identifies three inadequacies of current Chinese textbooks in terms of grammatical knowledge presentation, the organization of units, and the contextual structure of conversation passages. In particular, three textbooks published respectively in China, Singapore, and the US were selected for illustration. The article then develops a functional framework for the presentation of Chinese grammatical knowledge based on experiential, interpersonal, and textual functions. Moreover, it demonstrates that the arrangement of various units and the structure of sample conversations in Chinese textbooks can be improved using register theory and genre theory respectively. The research contributes to the growing body of research on the teaching of spoken Chinese and the development of effective Chinese textbooks.
References
Ansary, H., and Babaii, E. (2002). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation, The Internet TESL Journal, VIII (2).
Dennedy, D., and McNaught, C. (1997). Design elements for interactive multimedia. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 13 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1916
Chao, Y. R. (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. New York: Continuum.
Fang, Y., McDonald, E., and Cheng, M. (1995). On theme in Chinese: From clause to discourse. In R. Hasan and P. H. Fries (Eds.) On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective, 235–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jia, Y. (2006) Let’s Speak Chinese. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1956). Grammatical categories in modern Chinese. In G. R. Kress (Ed.) Halliday: System and Function in Language, 36–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). On language and linguistics. In J. Wester (Ed.) Collected Works of M.A. K. Halliday (Vol. 3). London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K., and McDonald, E. (2004). Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Chinese. In A. Caffarel, J. R. Martin and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (Eds.) Language Typology: A Functional Perspective, 305–396. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hasan, R. (1985). Linguistics, Language, and Verbal Art. Victoria: Deakin University.
Li, C., and Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Liu, Y, et al. (1997). Integrated Chinese: Simplified Characters Textbook. Boston: Cheng & Tsui Company
Long, R. J. (1981). Transitivity in Chinese. M.A. Thesis. University of Sydney, Sydney.
Lü, S. (1982). Essentials of Chinese Grammar. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Martin, J. R. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.) Children Writing: Reader, 21–29. Geelong Vic: Deakin University Press.
Martin, J. R. (1985). Factual Writing: Exploring and Challenging Social Reality. Geelong Vic: Deakin University Press.
Martin, J. R. (1993). Life as a noun: Arresting the universe in science and humanities. In M. A. K. Halliday and J. R. Martin (Eds.) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power, 221–267. London: Falmer.
McDonald, E. (1992). Outline of a functional grammar of Chinese for teaching purposes. Language Sciences, 14 (4), 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(92)90025-A
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2011). Mandarin Chinese. Beijing: People’s Education Press.
Ouyang, X. (1986). The Clause Complex in Chinese. MA Thesis. University of Sydney, Sydney.
Shum, M. S. K. (2003). The Functions of Language and the Teaching of Chinese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Tam, M. (1979). A Grammatical Description of Transitivity in Mandarin Chinese with Special Reference to Correspondences with English Based on a Study of Texts in Translation. PhD Thesis. University of London, London.
Tsung, T. H. (1986). Circumstantial Elements in Chinese (Master’s thesis). University of Sydney.
Veel, R. (1997). Learning how to mean – scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In F. Christie and J. R. Martin (Eds.) Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, 161—195. New York: Cassell.
Wang, L. D. (1959). A Short Note on the History of the Study of Chinese Language. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Zhu, Y. (1996). Modality and modulation in Chinese. In M. Berry (Ed.) Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Interpretations. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub. Corp.
Zhou, X. K. (1997). Material and Relational Transitivity in Chinese. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. The University of Melbourne.
