How to engage
Kindergarteners telling on their peers and recruiting adults’ assistance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.27498Keywords:
kindergarten interaction, telling-on, peer conflict, participation framework, summonsAbstract
This paper studies how children initiate telling-on sequences in kindergartens. The focus is on multimodal practices that children (6–7-year-olds) employ when engaging adults (teachers/caregivers) and peers in the telling-on sequences. The paper demonstrates how children utilise varying multimodal resources as well as display their moral stances in their telling-ons to recruit the adults’ intervention in the conflicts. The analyses also illustrate how the varying participation frameworks co-constructed by the participants have the potential to influence the organisation of the telling-ons and overall conflict resolution. The findings are based on video-recorded naturally occurring interactions in an English-speaking kindergarten in Finland. The data are analysed using the principles of multimodal conversation analysis.
References
Bateman, A. (2020). Young children’s affective stance through embodied displays of emotion during tellings. Text & Talk, 41(5), 643–668. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-2077
Björk-Willén, P. (2012). Being doggy: Disputes embedded in preschoolers’ family role-play. In S. Danby & M. Theobald (eds.), Disputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People (pp. 119–140). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2012)0000015009
Boggs, S. T. (1978). The development of verbal disputing in part-Hawaiian children. Language in Society, 7(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005753
Bolden, G., & Robinson, J. D. (2011). Soliciting accounts with why-interrogatives in naturally occurring English conversation. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 94–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01528.x
Burdelski, M., & Cekaite, A. (2022). Practices of peer inclusion: Recruitments to play in Swedish and Japanese preschools. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 6(1), 30–64. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.23286
Buttny, R. (1993). Social Accountability in Communication. Sage.
Cekaite, A. (2007). A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00509.x
Cekaite, A. (2012). Tattling and dispute resolution: Moral order, emotions and embodiment in the teacher-mediated disputes of young second language learners. In S. Danby & M. Theobald (eds.), Disputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People (pp. 165–191). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2012)0000015011
Cekaite, A., & Evaldsson, A.-C. (2008). Staging Linguistic Identities and Negotiating Monolingual Norms in Multiethnic School Settings. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(3), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710802387588
Church, A. (2009). Preference Organisation and Peer Disputes: How Young Children Resolve Conflict. Routledge.
Church, A. & Moore, E. (2022). Conflict. In A. Church & A. Bateman (eds.), Talking with Children: A Handbook of Interaction in Early Childhood Education (pp. 388–404). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108979764.020
Cobb-Moore, C. (2012). ‘Pretend I was mummy’: Children’s production of authority and subordinance in their pretend play interaction during disputes. In S. Danby & M. Theobald (eds.), Disputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People (pp. 85–118). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2012)0000015008
Corsaro, W. A. (2015). The Sociology of Childhood. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483399027
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1986). An Introduction to English Prosody. Edward Arnold.
Cromdal, J. (2004). Building bilingual oppositions: Code-switching in children’s disputes. Language in Society, 33(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404504031021
Cromdal, J. (2010). Gender as a practical concern in children’s management of play participation. In S. A. Speer & E. Stokoe (eds.), Conversation and Gender (pp. 294–309). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781032.015
Danby, S. (2002). The communicative competence of young children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 27(3), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693910202700306
Danby, S. & Baker, C. (1998). “What’s the problem?”: Restoring social order in the preschool classroom. In I. Hutchby & J. Moran-Ellis (eds.), Children and Social Competence: Arenas of Action (pp. 157–186). Falmer.
Danby, S. & Baker, C. (2000). Unravelling the fabric of social order in block area. In S. Hester & D. Francis (eds.), Local Educational Order: Ethnomethodological Studies of Knowledge and Action (pp. 91–140). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.73.05dan
Danby, S. & Theobald, M. (2012). Introduction: Disputes in everyday life – social and moral orders of children and young people. In S. Danby & M. Theobald (eds.), Disputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People (pp. xv–xxiv). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2012)0000015004
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse (pp. 139–182). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du
Ehrlich, S. & Blum-Kulka, S. (2010). Peer talk as a ‘double opportunity space’: The case of argumentative discourse. Discourse & Society, 21(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509353847
Evaldsson, A.-C. (2007). Accounting for Friendship: Moral Ordering and Category Membership in Preadolescent Girls’ Relational Talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 377–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701471377
Evaldsson, A.-C. (2017). Schoolyard Suspect: Blame Negotiations, Category Work and Conflicting Versions Among Children and Teachers. In A. Bateman & A. Church (eds.), Children’s Knowledge-in-Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 149–168). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1703-2_9
Evaldsson, A-C. & Karlsson, M. (2020). Protecting interactional spaces: Collusive alignments and territorial arrangements of two-against-one in girls’ play participation. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.014
Evaldsson, A.-C. & Svahn, J. (2012). School Bullying and the Micro-Politics of Girls’ Gossip Disputes. In S. Danby & M. Theobald (eds.), Disputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People (pp. 297–324). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2012)0000015016
Evaldsson, A.-C. & Svahn, J. (2017). Staging social aggression: Affective stances and moral character work in girls ‘gossip telling’. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 1(1), 36–64. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.32351
Ford, C. (2001). At the intersection of turn and sequence: Negation and what comes next. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics (pp. 51–79). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10.05for
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in Public. Harper Colophon Books.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
González-Martínez, E. & Drew, P. (2021). Informings as recruitment in nurses’ intrahospital telephone calls. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.013
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. Academic Press.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
Goodwin, C. (2009). Interactive Footing. In E. Holt & R. Clift (eds.), Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction (pp. 16–46). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486654.003
Goodwin, C. (2013). The Co-operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
Goodwin, C. (2018a). Co-operative Action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139016735
Goodwin, C. (2018b). Why Multimodality? Why Co-Operative Action? Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v1i2.110039
Goodwin, M. H. (2006). The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status, and Exclusion. Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773567
Goodwin, M. H., & Kyratzis, A. (2007). Children socializing children: Practices for negotiating the social order among peers. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701471260
Goodwin, M. H., & Kyratzis, A. (2012). Peer language socialization. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization (pp. 365–390). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342901.ch16
Günthner, S. (1996). The prosodic contextualization of moral work: An analysis of reproaches in “why”-formats. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in Conversation (pp. 271–302). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.009
Hoey, E. M. (2014). Sighing in Interaction: Somatic, Semiotic, and Social. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(2), 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.900229
Ingram, G. P. & Bering, J. M. (2010). Children’s tattling: the reporting of everyday norm violations in preschool settings. Child Development, 81(3), 945–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01444.x
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 13–31). Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Kendrick, K. H. & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
Kidwell, M. & Zimmerman, D. H. (2007). Joint attention as action. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 592–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.012
Korpela, R., Kurhila, S. & Stevanovic, M. (2022). Apologizing in Elementary School Peer Conflict Mediation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 55(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2022.2026168
Küttner, U.-A., Vatanen, A., Zinken, J. (2022). Invoking Rules in Everyday Family Interactions: A Method for Appealing to Practical Reasoning. Human Studies, 45, 793–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09648-0
Kyratzis, A. (2004). Talk and interaction among children and the co-construction of peer groups and peer culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 625–649. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144008
Maynard, D. W. (1985). On the functions of social conflict among children. American Sociological Review, 50(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095410
Maynard, D. W. (1986). Offering and soliciting collaboration in multi-party disputes among children (and other humans). Human Studies, 9, 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148131
Mondada, L. (2009). Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10), 1977–1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019
Mondada, L. (2019). Conventions for transcribing multimodality. Retrieved July 2023 from https://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcription
Moore, E. & Burdelski, M. (2020). Peer conflict and language socialization in preschool: Introduction to special issue. Linguistics and Education, 59, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100758
Nasi, N. (2022). Indexing authority in the classroom: Children’s practices to achieve an authoritative position among classmates. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 6(1), 108–130. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.22075
Niemi, K. & Bateman, A. (2015). ‘Cheaters and Stalkers’: Accusations in a classroom. Discourse Studies, 17(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614557755
Rossi, G. (2018). Composite Social Actions: The Case of Factual Declaratives in Everyday Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(4), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1524562
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in Conversational Openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
Theobald, M. (2009). Participation and Social Order in the Playground. Doctoral dissertation. Queensland University of Technology.
Theobald, M. (2013). Ideas as ‘possessitives’: Claims and counter claims in a playground dispute. Journal of Pragmatics, 45(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.009
Theobald, M. (2016). Achieving competence: The interactional features of children’s storytelling. Childhood, 23(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568215571619
Theobald, M. & Danby, S. (2012). ‘A problem of versions’: Laying down the law in the school playground. In S. Danby & M. Theobald (eds.), Disputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People (pp. 221–241). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2012)0000015013
Theobald, M. & Danby, S. (2017). Co-producing Cultural Knowledge: Children Telling Tales in the School Playground. In A. Bateman & A. Church (eds.), Children’s Knowledge-in-Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 111–125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1703-2_7
