Indicating intellectual and emotional states in narrating

Sound symbolism, gesturing and explicating practices in children’s oral storytelling

Authors

  • Agneta Pihl University of Gothenburg
  • Louise Peterson University of Gothenburg
  • Niklas Pramling University of Gothenburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.22085

Keywords:

oral storytelling, narrative, emotions, mental state terms, early childhood education and care (ECEC)

Abstract

The focus of this study is on how children in their retelling of oral stories indicate their understanding of the intentions and feelings of fictional characters. The method used is video documentation of storytelling activities in a preschool, involving 15 children aged 3–5 years and their teachers. The findings clarify how the children indicate the intellectual and emotional states of the fictional characters of stories in three ways: through (i) explicating, (ii) certain forms of gesturing and facial expressions, and (iii) sound symbolism. The educational implications of the findings are discussed in terms of how sound symbolism and gesturing in storytelling are critical to 
social justice – in allowing children not speaking the majority language to participate in storytelling.

Author Biographies

  • Agneta Pihl, University of Gothenburg

    Agneta Pihl has a PhD in child and youth studies at the Department of Education, Communication and Learning, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Her research interest is directed at narratives in early childhood education and care. She is interested in preschool children’s interaction and participation in oral storytelling activities with a focus on how they retell stories they have heard. Agneta is also a development manager at the municipality of Gothenburg and leads projects on language supportive teaching in preschools.

  • Louise Peterson, University of Gothenburg

    Louise Peterson is Senior Lecturer at the Department of Education, Communication and Learning, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Her research interest includes peoples’ use of digital technologies in different activities and how learning takes place and can be understood in boundaries between institutional and non-institutional settings. Louise is particularly interested in the ways in which digital technologies and social media are integrated in children’s everyday activities such as their play. She primarily conducts interdisciplinary studies of peoples’ interactions and communication in online environments, as well as of children’s social activities face-to-face.

  • Niklas Pramling, University of Gothenburg

    Niklas Pramling is Professor of Education at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. He is Director of two national research schools for preschool teachers (funded by the Swedish Research Council). He conducts communications research in early childhood education and care settings and beyond.

References

Abbott, J. & McCarthey, S. (2001). Classroom influences on first-grade students’ oral narratives. Journal of Literacy Research, 33(3), 389–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960109548118

Abelin, Å. (1999). Studies in Sound Symbolism. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics, 17. University of Gothenburg.

Åkerblom, A. & Harju, A. (2021). The becoming of a Swedish preschool child? Migrant children and everyday nationalism. Children’s Geographies, 19(5), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1566517

Barnes, J. L. (2018). Imaginary engagement, real-world effects: Fiction, emotion, and social cognition. Review of General Psychology, 22(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000124

Bateman, A. (2020). Young children’s affective stance through embodied displays of emotion during tellings. Text & Talk, 40(5), 643–668. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-2077

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/448619

Bruner, J. S. (2002). Making Stories: Law, Literature, Life. Harvard University Press.

Cefai, C., et al. (2015). Social inclusion and social justice: A resilience curriculum for early years and elementary schools in Europe. Journal for Multicultural Education, 9(3), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-01-2015-0002

Curenton, S. M. & Gardner-Neblett, N. (2015). Narrative thinking: Implications for black children’s social cognition. In S. Robson & S. F. Quinn (eds), The Routledge International Handbook of Young Children’s Thinking and Understanding (pp. 294–305). Routledge.

Davidson, C. (2009). Transcription: Imperatives for qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(2), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800206

Dockett, S., Einarsdottir, J. & Perry, B. (2009). Researching with children: Ethical tensions Journal of Early Childhood Research, 7, 283–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X09336971

Evaldsson, A.-C. & Abreu Fernandes, O. (2019). Embodied performances and footings in a young child’s spontaneous participation in bilingual Russian–Swedish storytelling. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 3(1–2), 36–64. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.37297

Fleer, M. & Pramling, N. (2015). A Cultural-Historical Study of Children Learning Science: Foregrounding Affective Imagination in Play-Based Settings. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9370-4

Flyxe, M. (2002). Translation of Japanese onomatopoeia into Swedish. Africa & Asia, 2(2), 54–73.

Guldin, R. (2016). Translation as Metaphor. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753638

Hall, C., Capin, P., Vaughn, S., Gillam, S., Wada, R., Fall, A. & Gillam, R. (2021). Narrative instruction in elementary classrooms: An observation study. Elementary School Journal, 121(3), 454–483. https://doi.org/10.1086/712416

Hartsmar, N., Leathwood, C. & Spinthourakis, J. (2021). Can educational programmes address social inequity? Some examples from Europe. In A. Ross (ed.), Educational Research for Social Justice, Vol. 1: Education Science, Evidence, and the Public Good. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62572-6_13

Imai, M. & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for

language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the

Royal Society B, 369, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0298

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an Introduction. In G. H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 13–23). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef

Kidd, D. C. & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves Theory of Mind. Science, 342, 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918

Laing, C. (2017). A perceptual advantage for onomatopoeia in early word learning: Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.017

Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Information Age.

Linell, P. (2014). Interactivities, intersubjectivities and language: On dialogism and phenomenology. Language and Dialogue, 4(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.2.01lin

Martin, C. & Evaldsson, A.-C. (2012). Affordances for participation: Children’s appropriation of rules in a Reggio Emilia school. Mind, Culture and Activity, 19(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2011.632049

Nelson, K. (Ed.). (1989). Narratives from the Crib. Harvard University Press.

Oatley, K., Dunbar, R. & Budelmann, F. (2018). Imagining possible worlds. Review of General Psychology, 22(2), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000149

Ochs, E. (1979). Transcriptions as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (eds), Developmental Pragmatic (pp. 43–72). Academic Press.

O’Reilly, M. (2005). ‘Active noising’: The use of noises in talk, the case of onomatopoeia, abstract sounds, and the functions they serve in therapy. Text & Talk, 25(6), 745–762. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.6.745

Oshiro, A., Pihl, A., Peterson, L. & Pramling, N. (2017). Understanding the psychology of a trickster tale: 5-year-old Japanese kindergarten children collaboratively retelling a kitsune story. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 8(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1547631

Pelletier, J. (2006). Relations among theory of mind, metacognitive language, reading skills and story comprehension in L1 and L2 learners. In A. Antonietti, O. Liverta-Sempio & A. Marchetti (Eds.), Theory of Mind and Language in Developmental Contexts (pp. 77–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24997-4_4

Pelletier, J. & Astington, J. W. (2004). Action, consciousness and theory of mind: Children’s ability to coordinate story characters’ actions and thoughts. Early Education and Development, 15(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1501_1

Pihl, A., Peterson, L. & Pramling, N. (2017). Children’s re-storying as a responsive practice. In S. Garvis & N. Pramling (Eds.), Narratives in Early Childhood Education: Communication, Sense Making and Lived Experience (pp. 89–101). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315640549-7

Pihl, A., Peterson, L. & Pramling, N. (2018). Children remembering and reshaping stories in retelling. Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 7(1), 127–146.

Pramling, N. (2017). Narrative engagement and children’s development. In S. Garvis & N. Pramling (eds), Narrative in Early Childhood Education: Communication, Sense Making and Lived Experience (pp. 162–169). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315640549-12

Pramling, N. & Säljö, R. (2015). The clinical interview: The child as a partner in conversations vs. the child as an object of research. In S. Robson & S. F. Quinn (eds), International Handbook of Young Children’s Thinking and Understanding (pp. 87–95). Routledge.

Pramling, N. & Ødegaard, E. E. (2011). Learning to narrate: Appropriating a cultural mould for sense-making and communication. In N. Pramling & I. Pramling Samuelsson (eds), Educational Encounters: Nordic Studies in Early Childhood Didactics (pp. 15–35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1617-9_2

Sadler, J. (1971). Onomatopoeia. The Classical Journal, 67(2), 174–177.

Saklofske, D., Zeidner, M. & Schwean, V. (2006). Theory of Mind and Language in Developmental Contexts. Springer.

Sasamoto, R. & Jackson, R. (2016). Onomatopoeia – showing-word or saying-word? Relevance theory, lexis, and the communication of impressions. Lingua, 175–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.11.003

Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good Research Practice. Swedish Research Council.

Theobald, M. (2019). Scaffolding storytelling and participation with a bilingual child in a culturally and linguistically diverse preschool in Australia. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 3(1–2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.37294

van Oers, B. (Ed.). (2003). Narratives of Childhood: Theoretical and Practical Explorations for the Innovation of Early Childhood Education. VU University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 4: The History of the Development of Higher Mental Functions (trans. M. J. Hall; ed. R. W. Rieber). Plenum.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 5: Child Psychology (trans. M. J. Hall; ed. R. W. Rieber). Plenum.

Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/10224

Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of Collective Remembering. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613715

Young, K. (2000). Gestures and the phenomenology of emotion. Narrative Semiotica, 131(1/2), 79–112. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2000.131.1-2.79

Published

2023-12-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pihl, A., Peterson, L., & Pramling, N. (2023). Indicating intellectual and emotional states in narrating: Sound symbolism, gesturing and explicating practices in children’s oral storytelling. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 7(2), 238-261. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.22085