Indexing authority in the classroom
Children’s practices to achieve an authoritative position among classmates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.22075Keywords:
children's peer interaction, classroom, authority, deontics, epistemicsAbstract
The paper explores children’s authoritative claims in the peer group, focusing on the practices through which children achieve a position of deontic and/or epistemic authority during peer conflict. Drawing from ethnographic research documented with video recordings in two primary schools in northern Italy, this study adopts a CA-informed approach to analyse 8- to 10-year-old children’s conflictual negotiations of authoritative positions in the group hierarchy. As the analysis illustrates, children mobilize institutional entities and strategically deploy knowledge to underpin their local claims of authority. In the discussion it is argued that such practices are relevant to children’s socialization into classroom expectations and to the local negotiation of valued identities in the peer group. These insights are also declined in relation to the dichotomy between social inclusion and exclusion.
References
Ahn, J. (2020). Honorifics and peer conflict in Korean children’s language socialization. Linguistics and Education, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.05.002
Burdelski, M. (2013). Socializing children to honorifics in Japanese: Identity and stance in interaction. Multilingua, 32(2), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2013-0012
Buzzelli, C. & Johnston, B. (2001). Authority, power, and morality in classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 873–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00037-3
Clift, R. & Holt, E. (2006). Introduction. In R. Clift & E. Holt (eds), Reporting Talk (pp. 1–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486654.002
Cobb-Moore, C. (2012). ‘Pretend I was mummy’: children’s production of authority and subordinance in their pretend play interaction during disputes. In S. Danby & M. Theobald (eds), Disputes in Everyday Life. Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People (pp. 85–118). Bingley: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2012)0000015008
Cobb-Moore, C., Danby, S. & Farrell, A. (2009). Young children as rule makers. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1477–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.013
Cooren, F. (2010). Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6
Corsaro W. A. (1992). Interpretive Reproduction in Children’s Peer Cultures. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786944
Corsaro, W. & Maynard, D. (1996). Format tying in discussion and argumentation among Italian and American children. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis & J. Guo (eds), Social interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 157–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2006). Assessing and Accounting. In R. Clift & E. Holt (eds), Reporting Talk (pp. 81-119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486654.005
Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 470–520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ehrlich, S. & Blum-Kulka, S. (2010). Peer talk as a ‘double opportunity space’: The case of argumentative discourse. Discourse & Society, 21(2), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509353847
Evaldsson, A. C. (2004). Shifting moral stances: Morality and gender in same-sex and cross-sex game interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(3), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_3
Evaldsson, A. C. (2007). Accounting for friendship: Moral ordering and category membership in preadolescent girls’ relational talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 377–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701471377
Evaldsson, A. C. & Tellgren, B. (2009). ‘Don’t enter – it’s dangerous’: Negotiations for power and exclusion in pre-school girls’ play interactions. Educational and Child Psychology, 26(2), 9–18.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Goodwin, M. H. (1995). Co-construction in girls’ hopscotch. Research on Language and social Interaction, 28(3), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_5
Goodwin. M. H. (2006). The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status, and Exclusion. Malden, MA: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773567
Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139016735
Goodwin, M. H. & Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied Family Choreography. Practices of Control, Care and Mundane Creativity. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207773
Griswold, O. (2007). Achieving authority: Discursive practices in Russian girls’ pretend play. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40(4), 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701471286
Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
Johansen, M. (2011). Agency and responsibility in reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2845–2860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.001
Jordan, E., Cowan, A. & Roberts, J. (1995). Knowing the rules: Discursive strategies on young children’s power struggles. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2006(95)90011-X
Kyratzis, A. (2004). Talk and interaction among children and the co-construction of peer groups and peer culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 625–649. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144008
Kyratzis, A. & Goodwin, M. H. (2017). Language socialization in children’s peer and sibling-kin group interactions. In P. Duff & S. May (eds), Language Socialization (pp. 123–138). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0_10
Kyratzis, A. & Johnson, S. J. (2017). Multimodal and multilingual resources in children’s framing of situated learning activities. Linguistics and Education, 41, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.07.002
Kyratzis, A., Marx, T. & Wade, E. R. (2001). Preschoolers’ communicative competence: Register shift in the marking of power in different contexts of friendship group talk. First Language, 21, 387–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272370102106308
Macbeth, D. (1991). Teacher authority as practical action. Linguistics and Education, 3(4), 281–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(91)90012-8
Maynard, D. (1985). On the functions of social conflict among children. American Sociological Review, 50, 207–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095410
Melander, H. (2012). Transformations of knowledge within a peer group. Knowing and learning in interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.09.003
Moore, E. & Burdelski, M. (2020). Peer conflict and language socialization in preschool: Introduction to special issue. Linguistics and Education, 59, 100758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100758
Morek, M. (2015). Show that you know: Explanations, interactional identities and epistemic stance-taking in family talk and peer talk. Linguistics and Education, 31, 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.10.004
Nasi, N. (In press). Practices of inclusion/exclusion in and through classroom dialogue: Children’s peer socialization to institutional norms of literacy and language use. Language and Dialogue.
Reynolds, J. (2010). Enregistering the voices of discursive figures of authority in Antonero children’s socio-dramatic play. Pragmatics, 20(4), 467–493. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20.4.01rey
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation, vols. I and II. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Sheldon, A. (1996). You can be the baby brother, but you aren’t born yet: Preschool girls’ negotiation for power and access in pretend play. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29, 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2901_4
Stevanovic, M. & Peräkylä, A. (2012), Deontic authority in interaction: the right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
Weber, M. (1964). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
