Getting dressed as a social activity

The interactional competence of an Autistic teenager who doesn’t use speech

Authors

  • Erika Prado University of Chicago
  • Mary Bucholtz University of California

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.17673

Keywords:

Autism, collaboration, embodiment, routine activity, sociality

Abstract

Up to 25 per cent of children diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder are classified as ‘nonverbal’. Building on interactional research on the communicative skills of Autistic children and of individuals who do not use speech, this article uses video data to examine the interactional competence of an Autistic bilingual Latino teenager who does not use speech to communicate. A comparison of multiple instances of the teenager’s getting-dressed routine shows that contrary to the clinical framing of this routine as individualized and efficiency-oriented, getting dressed can be a social achievement that relies on the collaboration of multiple social actors in community settings. While a core feature of an Autism diagnosis is social and communicative impairment, the analysis demonstrates that Autistic interaction is highly social and richly communicative as well as affectively engaged.

Author Biographies

Erika Prado, University of Chicago

Erika Prado is a PhD student, National Science Foundation Fellow and Ford Foundation Fellow in the Department of Comparative Human Development at the University of Chicago. She graduated with honours with a bachelor’s degree in Psychology and a minor in Sociocultural Linguistics at the University of California, Santa Barbara, where she was a McNair Scholar. She is a linguistic anthropologist who conducts research on language, interaction and autism in the Latinx community.

Mary Bucholtz, University of California

Mary Bucholtz is professor in the Department of Linguistics at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and director of the Center for California Languages and Cultures. She is a linguistic anthropologist whose current research focuses on the linguistic and interactional dimensions of identity and expertise among Latinx youth. Her most recent book is Feeling It: Language, Youth, and Affect in Latinx Youth Learning (co-edited with Dolores Inés Casillas and Jin Sook Lee, Routledge, 2018).

References

Auburn, T. & Pollock, C. (2013). Laughter and competence: Children with severe autism using laughter to joke and tease. In P. Glenn & E. Holt (eds), Studies of Laughter in Interaction (pp. 135–160). London: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472542069.ch-007

Broderick, A. A. & Ne’eman, A. (2008). Autism as metaphor: Narrative and counter-narrative. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(5–6), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802377490

Brown, L. X. Z. (2011). The significance of semantics: Person-first language: Why it matters. Autistic Hoya (4 August). Retrieved from www.autistichoya.com/2011/08/significance-of-semantics-person-first.html

Brown, L. X. Z. (2013). Autism FAQ. Autistic Hoya (September). Retrieved from www.autistichoya.com/p/introduction-to-autism-faqs-of-autism.html

Çetrez I. s¸can, G., Nurçin, E. & Fazliog lu, Y. (2016). Effect of most-to-least prompting procedure on dressing skill of students with autism. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(18), 1766–1774. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2933

Chen, R. S. Y. & Kwong, L. K. (2016). The interactional dimension of repetitive behaviours by individuals with autism. Unpublished master’s thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10356/65994

Damico, J. S. & Nelson, R. L. (2005). Interpreting problematic behavior: Systematic compensatory adaptations as emergent phenomena in autism. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19(5), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200400027163

Dickerson, P., Stribling, P. & Rae, J. (2007). Tapping into interaction: How children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders design and place tapping in relation to activities in progress. Gesture, 7(3), 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.7.3.02dic

Du Bois, J. W. (2011). Representing discourse. Retrieved from www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/projects/transcription/representing

Du Bois, J. W. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024

Enfield, N. J. & Levinson, S. C. (eds) (1996). Roots of Human Sociality. Oxford: Berg.

Fantuzzo, J. W. & Smith, C. S. (1983). Programmed generalization of dress efficiency across settings for a severely disturbed, autistic child. Psychological Reports, 53, 871–879. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.3.871

Goodley, D. (2016). Autism and the human. In K. Runswick-Cole, R. Mallett & S. Timimi (eds), Re-thinking Autism: Diagnosis, Identity and Equality (pp. 146–158). London: Jessica Kingsley.

Goodwin, C. (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: The social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.151

Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457

Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Directive-response speech sequences in girls’ and boys’ task activities. In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker & N. Furman (eds), Women and Language in Literature and Society (pp. 157–173). New York: Praeger.

Goodwin, M. H. & Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied Family Choreography: Practices of Control, Care, and Mundane Creativity. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207773

Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L. & Nevile, M. (eds). (2014). Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187

Jaswal, V. K. & Akhtar, N. (2019). Being versus appearing socially uninterested: Challenging assumptions about social motivation in autism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42(e82), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18001826

Kapp, S. K. (ed.). (2020). Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement: Stories from the Frontline. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0

Korkiakangas, T. & Rae, J. (2014). The interactional use of eye-gaze in children with autism spectrum disorder. Interaction Studies, 15(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.15.2.12kor

Lerner, G. H., Zimmerman, D. H. & Kidwell, M. (2011). Formal structures of practical tasks: A resource for action in the social life of very young children. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin & C. LeBaron (eds), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World (pp. 44–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, S. C. (2006). On the human ‘interaction engine’. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (eds), Roots of Human Sociality (pp. 39–69). Oxford: Berg. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135517-3

Maynard, D. W. & Turowetz, J. J. (2017). Doing testing: How concrete competence can facilitate or inhibit performances of children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Qualitative Sociology, 40, 467–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-017-9368-5

McGuire, A. (2016). War on Autism: On the Cultural Logic of Normative Violence. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.7784427

Milton, D. E. M. (2019). Beyond tokenism: Autistic people in autism research. Psychologist, 32, 2–3. Retrieved from https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-32/october-2019/beyond-tokenism-autistic-people-autism-research

Nolan, J. & McBride, M. (2015). Embodied semiosis: Autistic ‘stimming’ as sensory praxis. In P. P. Trifonas (ed.), International Handbook of Semiotics (pp. 1069–1078). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_48

Ochs, E., Kremer-Sadlik, T., Sirota, K. G. & Solomon, O. (2004). Autism and the social world: An anthropological perspective. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 147–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604041766

Ochs, E. & Solomon, O. (eds) (2004). Discourse and autism. Special issue of Discourse Studies, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604041763

Ochs, E. & Solomon, O. (2010). Autistic sociality. Ethos, 38: 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01082.x

Ochs, E., Solomon, O. & Sterponi, L. (2005). Limitations and transformation of habitus in child-directed communication. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5): 547–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054406

Psathas, G. (ed.). (1990). Interaction Competence. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Rendle-Short, J. (2014). Using conversational structure as an interactional resource: Children with Asperger’s syndrome and their conversational partners. In J. Arciuli & J. Brock (eds), Communication in Autism (pp. 217–244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.11.10ren

Sarrett, J. C. (2012). Autistic human rights – a proposal. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32(4). Retrieved from https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3247/3186. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v32i4.3247

Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2): 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041

Singer, J. (1999). ‘Why can’t you be normal for once in your life?’: From a ‘problem with no name’ to the emergence of a new category of difference. In M. Corker & S. French (eds), Disability Discourse (pp. 59–67). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Sirota, K. G. (2006). Habits of the hearth: Children’s bedtime routines as relational work. Text and Talk, 26(4–5), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.020

Solomon, O. (2010a). Sense and the senses: Anthropology and the study of autism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105012

Solomon, O. (2010b). What a dog can do: Children with autism and therapy dogs in social interaction. Ethos,38(1), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2010.01085.x

Sterponi, L. & Chen, R. S. Y. (2019). Situating autistic emotionality in interactional, sociocultural, and political contexts. In S. E. Pritzker, J. Fenigsen & J. M. Wilce (eds), Routledge Handbook of Language and Emotion (273–284). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000682

Sterponi, L. & de Kirby, J. (2017). What discourse analytic approaches contribute to the study of language and autism: A focus on conversation analysis. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 1(1), 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.28458

Sterponi, L. & Shankey, J. (2014). Rethinking echolalia: Repetition as interactional resource in the communication of a child with autism. Journal of Child Language, 41, 275–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000682

Stiegler, L. N. (2007). Discovering communicative competencies in a nonspeaking child with autism. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2007/041)

Tulbert, E. & Goodwin, M. H. (2011). Choreographies of attention: Multimodality in a routine family activity. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin & C. LeBaron (eds), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World (pp. 79–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yergeau, M. (2016). Occupying autism: Rhetoric, involuntarity, and the meaning of autistic lives. In P. Block, D. Kasnitz, A. Nishida & N. Pollard (eds), Occupying Disability: Critical Approaches to Community, Justice, and Decolonizing Disability (pp. 83–96). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9984-3_6

Published

2021-12-09

How to Cite

Prado, E. ., & Bucholtz, M. . (2021). Getting dressed as a social activity: The interactional competence of an Autistic teenager who doesn’t use speech. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 5(2), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.17673

Issue

Section

Articles