‘I was just thinking’

Cognitive self-reports and engagement with feelings-talk in child mental health assessments


  • Ian Hutchby University of York
  • Michelle O’Reilly University of Leicester
  • Alison Drewett University of Leicester
  • Victoria Stafford University of Leicester




child psychology, conversation analysis, emotional and behavioural difficulties, epistemics, expert–lay discourse, feelings-talk


Based on a corpus of child mental health assessment meetings, this article explores how practitioners use reports on their own cognitive processing, such as I was just thinking or I’m just wondering, in interaction with children and adolescents presenting with potential mental health issues. Using the methods of conversation analysis, the findings reveal different ways in which this device is used to encourage the child to engage with a particular topic, interpretation, or version of events from the standpoint of subjective experience; in other words, to produce feelings-talk. The analysis contributes further towards the understanding of child–adult interaction in professional arenas of action: in this case child mental health assessments.

Author Biographies

Ian Hutchby, University of York

Ian Hutchby is honorary professor in the Department of Sociology, University of York, and a Visiting Researcher in the Greenwood Institute for Child Health, University of Leicester. His research uses conversation analysis to investigate the situated social competencies of children interacting with adults in everyday and institutional settings such as child counselling, family therapy and child mental health assessments.

Michelle O’Reilly, University of Leicester

Michelle O’Reilly is associate professor of communication in mental health at the University of Leicester, Greenwood Institute for Child Health. Her joint activities between the university and Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust centre on qualitative research in child mental health, with a focus on family therapy interactions and child mental health assessments.

Alison Drewett, University of Leicester

Alison Drewett is a specialist speech and language therapist with Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust. Her recent research, based in the Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, is a conversation analytic approach to investigating decision-making in mental health hospital ward rounds for autistic patients, particularly around requests for home leave and discharge.

Victoria Stafford, University of Leicester

Victoria Stafford teaches children with special educational needs in the primary school sector, and is a doctoral graduate and Visiting Researcher in the Greenwood Institute for Child Health, University of Leicester. Her research interests centre on the discourse practices of child mental health assessments, using conversation analysis.


Alanen, L. (1998). Children and the family order: Constraints and competencies. In I. Hutchby & J. Moran-Ellis (eds), Children and Social Competence: Arenas of Action (pp. 29–45). London: Falmer Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203975657

Alderson, P. (1993). Children’s Consent to Surgery. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Aronsson, K. & Cederborg, A-C. (1996). Coming of age in family therapy talk: Perspective setting in multiparty problem formulations. Discourse Processes, 21, 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544955

Bolden, G. (2013). Unpacking ‘self’: Repair and epistemics in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76, 314–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272513498398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272513498398

Cekaite, A. & Björk-Willen, P. (2018). Enchantment in storytelling: Co-operation and participation in children’s aesthetic experience. Linguistics and Education, 48, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.08.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.08.005

Childs, C. (2014). From reading minds to social interaction: Respecifying theory of mind. Human Studies, 37, 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9284-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9284-y

Craig, R. & Sanusi, A. (2000). ‘I’m just saying’: Discourse markers of standpoint continuity. Argumentation, 14, 425–445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007880826834

Danby, S. & Baker, C. (1998). ‘What’s the problem?’ Restoring social order in the preschool classroom. In I. Hutchby & J. Moran-Ellis (eds), Children and Social Competence: Arenas of Action (pp. 157–186). London: Falmer Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203975657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203975657

Edwards, D. (1999). Emotion discourse. Culture and Psychology, 5, 271–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9953001

Graf, E.-M. & Pawelczyk, J. (2014). The interactional accomplishment of feelings-talk in psychotherapy and executive coaching: Same format, different functions? In E.-M. Graf, M. Sator & T. Spranz-Fogasy (eds), Discourses of Helping Professions (pp. 59–89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.252.04gra DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.252.04gra

Grant, L. (2011). The frequency and functions of just in British academic spoken English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.006

Heritage, J. (2013). Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies, 15, 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501449 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501449

Heritage, J. & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103

Holmes, E., Toerian, M. & Jackson, C. (2017). The interactional bind of ‘Just [do X]’. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50, 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1375807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1375807

Hutchby, I. (2005). Active listening: Formulations and the elicitation of feelings-talk in child counselling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38, 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_4

Hutchby, I. (2007). The Discourse of Child Counselling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.21

Hutchby, I. (2012). Participation and the institutional agenda in child counselling: Proffering as a means of topic management. In C. Baraldi & V. Iervese (eds), Participation, Facilitation and Mediation: Children and Young People in Their Social Contexts (pp. 87–104). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203119617-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203119617-11

Hutchby, I. & Dart, A. (2018). ‘Let’s check in with our tummies’: Orienting to feelings-talk in group supervision for psychotherapy counsellors. Discourse Studies, 20, 598–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618760600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618760600

Hutchby, I. & O’Reilly, M. (2010). Children’s participation and the familial moral order in family therapy. Discourse Studies, 12, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609357406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609357406

Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity.

Jefferson, G. (1986). Notes on latency in overlap onset. Human Studies, 9, 153–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148125

Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger & P. Bull (eds), Conversation (pp. 166–196). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Jenkins, L. & Hepburn, A. (2015). Children’s sensations as interactional phen­omena. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12, 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1054534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1054534

Kiyimba, N., O’Reilly, M. & Lester, J. (2018). Agenda-setting with children using the ‘three wishes’ technique. Journal of Child Health Care, 22, 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493518762487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493518762487

Lee, D. (1987). The semantics of just. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 377–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90138-X

Lindemann, S. & Mauranen, A. (2001). ‘It’s just real messy’: The occurrence and function of just in a corpus of academic speech. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(01)00026-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00026-6

Locke, A. & Edwards, D. (2003). Bill and Monica: Memory, emotion and normativity in Clinton’s Grand Jury testimony. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322127238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322127238

Mayall, B. (1994). Children in action at home and in school. In B. Mayall (ed.), Children’s Childhoods Observed and Experienced (pp. 114–127). London: Falmer Press.

Mehan, H. (1979). What time is it Denise? Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory and Practice, 18, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846

Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A. & Thompson, S. A. (eds) (1996). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874

Pawelczyk, J. (2011). Talk as Therapy: Psychotherapy in a Linguistic Perspective. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078679

Peräkylä, A. & Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse and Society, 14, 727–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030146003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030146003

Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a ‘fishing’ device. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1980.tb00020.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00020.x

Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimising claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00148128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128

Sacks, H. & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organisation of reference to persons and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York: Irvington.

Schegloff, E. A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds), Talk at Work (pp. 101–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shakespeare, P. (1998). Aspects of Confused Speech: A Study of Verbal Interaction Between Confused and Normal Speakers. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203810811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203810811

Silverman, D. (1987). Communication and Medical Practice. London: Sage.

Stafford, V., Hutchby, I., Karim, K. & O’Reilly, M. (2014). ‘Why are you here?’: Seeking children’s accounts of their presentation to child and adolescent mental health services. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 19, 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104514543957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104514543957

Stivers, T. (2011). Language socialization in children’s medical encounters. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (eds), The Handbook of Language Socializa­tion (pp. 247–267). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342901.ch11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342901.ch11

Stivers, T., Mondada, L. & Steensig, J. (eds) (2011). The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511921674.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002

te Molder, H. & Potter, J. (eds) (2005). Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9129-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9129-x

Terasaki, A. (2004 [1976]). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp.171–223). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.11ter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.11ter

Tulbert, E. & Goodwin, M. H. (2011). Choreographies of attention: Multimodality in a routine family activity. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin & C. LeBaron (eds), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World (pp. 79–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404512000711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404512000711

Turowetz, J. (2017). On the use of ‘I just thought’ formulations for modifying one’s stance toward a problematic action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50, 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1375800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1375800

Wagner, D. & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2008). ‘Just don’t’: The suppression and invitation of dialogue in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9097-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9097-x



How to Cite

Hutchby, I., O’Reilly, M., Drewett, A., & Stafford, V. (2021). ‘I was just thinking’: Cognitive self-reports and engagement with feelings-talk in child mental health assessments. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 4(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.17650