Deontics at bedtime

A case study of participants’ resources in a directive trajectory involving a mother and her autistic child


  • Gates Henderson Victoria University of Wellington



autism, parent–child interaction, conversation analysis, directives


Directive trajectories are common in parent–child talk as parents attempt to engage their children in household activities. Previous research on families with autistic children has reported that parents have difficulty engaging their children in household activities. The current study analyses the strategies a parent utilizes in negotiating an activity contract with their autistic child. The analyses show that the parent negotiates stances towards autonomy, category-membership-tied activities and social obligations, as well as used embodied conduct. The analyses also show how the child is sensitive to these strategies and actively participates in the directive trajectory. The findings show that both parent and child are active co-constructors of the social relationship in directive trajectories and that the child can strategically counter the variety of directive resources the parent uses.

Author Biography

Gates Henderson, Victoria University of Wellington

Gates Henderson is a PhD student in the School of Psychology at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. In her PhD work, she uses conversation analysis to study the social interaction between parents and their autistic children. Her interests lie in morality/accountability, identity and atypical talk.


Adamson, L. B., McArthur, D., Markov, Y., Dunbar, B. & Bakeman, R. (2001). Autism and joint attention: Young children’s responses to maternal bids. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 439–453. DOI:

Aronsson, K. & Cekaite, A. (2011). Activity contracts and directives in every­day family politics. Discourse & Society, 22(2), 137–154. DOI:

Blum-Kulka, S. (1997). Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Cekaite, A. (2010). Shepherding the child: Embodied directive sequences in parent–child interactions. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 30(1), 1–25. DOI:

Clayman, S. E. & Heritage, J. C. (2014). Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds), Studies in Language and Social Interaction (vol. 26, pp. 55–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI:

Clift, R. (2001). Meaning in interaction: The case of actually. Language, 77(2), 245–291. DOI:

Craven, A. & Potter, J. (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 419–442. DOI:

Curl, T. S. & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. DOI:

Damico, J. S. & Nelson, R. L. (2005). Interpreting problematic behavior: System­atic compensatory adaptations as emergent phenomena in autism. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19(5), 405–417. DOI:

Dean, M., Adams, G. F. & Kasari, C. (2013). How narrative difficulties build peer rejection: A discourse analysis of a girl with autism and her female peers. Discourse Studies, 15(2), 147–166. DOI:

Demuth, C. (2013). Handling power-asymmetry in interactions with infants: A comparative socio-cultural perspective. Interaction Studies, 14(2), 212–239. DOI:

Dickerson, P., Stribling, P. & Rae, J. (2007). Tapping into interaction: How children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders design and place tapping in relation to activ­ities in progress. Gesture, 7(3), 271–303. DOI:

Dindar, K., Korkiakangas, T., Laitila, A. & Kärnä, E. (2016a). Building mutual understanding: How children with autism spectrum disorder manage inter­actional trouble. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 7(1), 49–77. DOI:

Dindar, K., Korkiakangas, T., Laitila, A. & Kärnä, E. (2016b). Facilitating joint attention with salient pointing in interactions involving children with autism spectrum disorder. Gesture, 15(3), 372–403. DOI:

Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society, 5(1), 25–66. DOI:

Goodwin, M. H. & Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied Family Choreography. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI:

Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text & Talk, 26(4–5), 515–543. DOI:

Hepburn, A. & Bolden, G. B. (2017). Transcribing for Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. DOI:

Heritage, J. (1988). Explanations as accounts: A conversation analytic perspective. In C. Antaki (ed.), Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods (pp. 127–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Johnson, N. L., Bekhet, A., Robinson, K. & Rodriguez, D. (2014). Attributed meanings and strategies to prevent challenging behaviors of hospitalized children with autism: Two perspectives. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 28(5), 386–393. DOI:

Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kenny, L., Hattersley, C., Molins, B., Buckley, C., Povey, C. & Pellicano, E. (2016). Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community. Autism, 20(4), 442–462. DOI:

Kent, A. (2011). Directing Dinnertime: Practices and Resources Used by Parents and Children to Deliver and Respond to Directive Actions. Thesis, Loughborough University. Retrieved from

Kent, A. (2012a). Responding to Directives: What can Children do when a Parent Tells them what to do? In S. Danby & M. Theobald (eds), Sociological Studies of Children and Youth (Vol. 15, pp. 57–84). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI:

Kent, A. (2012b). Compliance, resistance and incipient compliance when resp­onding to directives. Discourse Studies, 14(6), 711–730. DOI:

Korkiakangas, T. & Rae, J. (2014). The interactional use of eye-gaze in children with autism spectrum disorders. Interaction Studies, 15(2), 233–259. DOI:

Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2004). How children with autism and Asperger syndrome respond to questions: A ‘naturalistic’ theory of mind task. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 185–206. DOI:

Larson, E. (2006). Caregiving and autism: How does children’s propensity for routinization influence participation in family activities? OTJR: Occupa­tion, Participation and Health, 26(2), 69–79. DOI:

Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32(2). DOI:

Loveland, K. A., Landry, S. H., Hughes, S. O., Hall, S. K. & McEvoy, R. E. (1988). Speech acts and the pragmatic deficits of autism. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 31(4), 593. DOI:

Meirsschaut, M., Roeyers, H. & Warreyn, P. (2010). Parenting in families with a child with autism spectrum disorder and a typically developing child: Mothers’ experiences and cognitions. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 4(4), 661–669. DOI:

Mondada, L. (2016). Conventions for multimodal transcription. Retrieved 6 August 2019 from

Muskett, T., Perkins, M., Clegg, J. & Body, R. (2010). Inflexibility as an inter­actional phenomenon: Using conversation analysis to re-examine a symptom of autism. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24(1), 1–16. DOI:

Neely-Barnes, S. L., Hall, H. R., Roberts, R. J. & Graff, J. C. (2011). Parenting a child with an autism spectrum disorder: Public perceptions and parental conceptualizations. Journal of Family Social Work, 14(3), 208–225. DOI:

Ochs, E. & Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2007). Introduction: Morality as family practice. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 5–10. DOI:

Ochs, E. & Solomon, O. (2010). Autistic sociality. Ethos, 38(1), 69–92. DOI:

O’Nions, E., Happé, F., Evers, K., Boonen, H. & Noens, I. (2018). How do parents manage irritability, challenging behaviour, non-compliance and anxiety in children with autism spectrum disorders? A meta-synthesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(4), 1272–1286. DOI:

Ooi, K., Ong, Y. S., Jacob, S. A. & Khan, T. M. (2016). A meta-synthesis on parenting a child with autism. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 745–762. DOI:

Pontecorvo, C., Fasulo, A. & Sterponi, L. (2001). Mutual apprentices: The making of parenthood and childhood in family dinner conversations. Human Develop­ment, 44(6), 340–361. DOI:

Radford, J. & Tarplee, C. (2000). The management of conversational topic by a ten year old child with pragmatic difficulties. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 14(5), 387–403. DOI:

Raymond, G. (2004). Prompting action: The stand-alone ‘so’ in ordinary conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 37(2), 185–218. DOI:

Rendle-Short, J. (2007). ‘Catherine, you’re wasting your time’: Address terms within the Australian political interview. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(9), 1503–1525. DOI:

Reynolds, E. & Fitzgerald, R. (2015). Challenging normativity re-appraising category bound, tied and predicated features. In R. Fitzgerald & W. Housley (eds), Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis (pp. 99–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. DOI:

Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101. DOI:

Sinclair, J. (2013). Why I dislike ‘person first’ Language. Autonomy, The Critical Journal Of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies, 1(2). Retrieved from

Sirota, K. G. (2006). Habits of the hearth: Children’s bedtime routines as relational work. Text & Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 26(4–5), 493–514. DOI:

Solomon, O. (2004). Narrative introductions: Discourse competence of children with autistic spectrum disorders. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 253–276. DOI:

Solomon, O. (2008). Language, autism, and childhood: An ethnographic perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 28, 150–169. DOI:

Sterponi, L. (2004). Construction of rules, accountability and moral identity by high-functioning children with autism. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 207–228. DOI:

Sterponi, L. & Shankey, J. (2014). Rethinking echolalia: Repetition as inter­actional resource in the communication of a child with autism. Journal of Child Language, 41(2), 275–304. DOI:

Stevanovic, M. (2018). Social deontics: A nano-level approach to human power play. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(3), 369–389. DOI:

Stribling, P., Rae, J. & Dickerson, P. (2009). Using conversation analysis to explore the recurrence of a topic in the talk of a boy with an autism spectrum disorder. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23(8), 555–582. DOI:

Wilkinson, R. (2019). Atypical interaction: Conversation analysis and com­municative impairments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 281–299. DOI:

Wingard, L. (2006). Parents’ inquiries about homework: The first mention. Text & Talk, 26(4–5), 573–596. DOI:



How to Cite

Henderson, G. . (2021). Deontics at bedtime: A case study of participants’ resources in a directive trajectory involving a mother and her autistic child. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 4(2), 168–191.