Deontics at bedtime

A case study of participants’ resources in a directive trajectory involving a mother and her autistic child

Authors

  • Gates Henderson Victoria University of Wellington

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.12412

Keywords:

autism, parent–child interaction, conversation analysis, directives

Abstract

Directive trajectories are common in parent–child talk as parents attempt to engage their children in household activities. Previous research on families with autistic children has reported that parents have difficulty engaging their children in household activities. The current study analyses the strategies a parent utilizes in negotiating an activity contract with their autistic child. The analyses show that the parent negotiates stances towards autonomy, category-membership-tied activities and social obligations, as well as used embodied conduct. The analyses also show how the child is sensitive to these strategies and actively participates in the directive trajectory. The findings show that both parent and child are active co-constructors of the social relationship in directive trajectories and that the child can strategically counter the variety of directive resources the parent uses.

Author Biography

Gates Henderson, Victoria University of Wellington

Gates Henderson is a PhD student in the School of Psychology at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. In her PhD work, she uses conversation analysis to study the social interaction between parents and their autistic children. Her interests lie in morality/accountability, identity and atypical talk.

References

Adamson, L. B., McArthur, D., Markov, Y., Dunbar, B. & Bakeman, R. (2001). Autism and joint attention: Young children’s responses to maternal bids. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(01)00089-2

Aronsson, K. & Cekaite, A. (2011). Activity contracts and directives in every­day family politics. Discourse & Society, 22(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510392124

Blum-Kulka, S. (1997). Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cekaite, A. (2010). Shepherding the child: Embodied directive sequences in parent–child interactions. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 30(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.001

Clayman, S. E. & Heritage, J. C. (2014). Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds), Studies in Language and Social Interaction (vol. 26, pp. 55–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26.03cla

Clift, R. (2001). Meaning in interaction: The case of actually. Language, 77(2), 245–291.

Craven, A. & Potter, J. (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610370126

Curl, T. S. & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613

Damico, J. S. & Nelson, R. L. (2005). Interpreting problematic behavior: System­atic compensatory adaptations as emergent phenomena in autism. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19(5), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200400027163

Dean, M., Adams, G. F. & Kasari, C. (2013). How narrative difficulties build peer rejection: A discourse analysis of a girl with autism and her female peers. Discourse Studies, 15(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612471472

Demuth, C. (2013). Handling power-asymmetry in interactions with infants: A comparative socio-cultural perspective. Interaction Studies, 14(2), 212–239. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.14.2.04dem

Dickerson, P., Stribling, P. & Rae, J. (2007). Tapping into interaction: How children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders design and place tapping in relation to activ­ities in progress. Gesture, 7(3), 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.7.3.02dic

Dindar, K., Korkiakangas, T., Laitila, A. & Kärnä, E. (2016a). Building mutual understanding: How children with autism spectrum disorder manage inter­actional trouble. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 7(1), 49–77. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v7i1.28228

Dindar, K., Korkiakangas, T., Laitila, A. & Kärnä, E. (2016b). Facilitating joint attention with salient pointing in interactions involving children with autism spectrum disorder. Gesture, 15(3), 372–403. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.15.3.06din

Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society, 5(1), 25–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006849

Goodwin, M. H. & Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied Family Choreography. Abingdon: Routledge.

Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text & Talk, 26(4–5), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.021

Hepburn, A. & Bolden, G. B. (2017). Transcribing for Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Heritage, J. (1988). Explanations as accounts: A conversation analytic perspective. In C. Antaki (ed.), Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods (pp. 127–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Johnson, N. L., Bekhet, A., Robinson, K. & Rodriguez, D. (2014). Attributed meanings and strategies to prevent challenging behaviors of hospitalized children with autism: Two perspectives. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 28(5), 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2013.10.001

Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kenny, L., Hattersley, C., Molins, B., Buckley, C., Povey, C. & Pellicano, E. (2016). Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community. Autism, 20(4), 442–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315588200

Kent, A. (2011). Directing Dinnertime: Practices and Resources Used by Parents and Children to Deliver and Respond to Directive Actions. Thesis, Loughborough University. Retrieved from https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/bitstream/2134/8960/1/Kent%20PhD%20Thesis%20Final.pdf

Kent, A. (2012a). Responding to Directives: What can Children do when a Parent Tells them what to do? In S. Danby & M. Theobald (eds), Sociological Studies of Children and Youth (Vol. 15, pp. 57–84). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2012)0000015007

Kent, A. (2012b). Compliance, resistance and incipient compliance when resp­onding to directives. Discourse Studies, 14(6), 711–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612457485

Korkiakangas, T. & Rae, J. (2014). The interactional use of eye-gaze in children with autism spectrum disorders. Interaction Studies, 15(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.15.2.12kor

Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2004). How children with autism and Asperger syndrome respond to questions: A ‘naturalistic’ theory of mind task. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604041767

Larson, E. (2006). Caregiving and autism: How does children’s propensity for routinization influence participation in family activities? OTJR: Occupa­tion, Participation and Health, 26(2), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944920602600205

Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X

Loveland, K. A., Landry, S. H., Hughes, S. O., Hall, S. K. & McEvoy, R. E. (1988). Speech acts and the pragmatic deficits of autism. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 31(4), 593. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3104.593

Meirsschaut, M., Roeyers, H. & Warreyn, P. (2010). Parenting in families with a child with autism spectrum disorder and a typically developing child: Mothers’ experiences and cognitions. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 4(4), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2010.01.002

Mondada, L. (2016). Conventions for multimodal transcription. Retrieved 6 August 2019 from https://franzoesistik.philhist.unibas.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/franzoesistik/mondada_multimodal_conventions.pdf

Muskett, T., Perkins, M., Clegg, J. & Body, R. (2010). Inflexibility as an inter­actional phenomenon: Using conversation analysis to re-examine a symptom of autism. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699200903281739

Neely-Barnes, S. L., Hall, H. R., Roberts, R. J. & Graff, J. C. (2011). Parenting a child with an autism spectrum disorder: Public perceptions and parental conceptualizations. Journal of Family Social Work, 14(3), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2011.571539

Ochs, E. & Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2007). Introduction: Morality as family practice. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069451

Ochs, E. & Solomon, O. (2010). Autistic sociality. Ethos, 38(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01082.x

O’Nions, E., Happé, F., Evers, K., Boonen, H. & Noens, I. (2018). How do parents manage irritability, challenging behaviour, non-compliance and anxiety in children with autism spectrum disorders? A meta-synthesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(4), 1272–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3361-4

Ooi, K., Ong, Y. S., Jacob, S. A. & Khan, T. M. (2016). A meta-synthesis on parenting a child with autism. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 745–762. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S100634

Pontecorvo, C., Fasulo, A. & Sterponi, L. (2001). Mutual apprentices: The making of parenthood and childhood in family dinner conversations. Human Develop­ment, 44(6), 340–361. https://doi.org/10.1159/000046155

Radford, J. & Tarplee, C. (2000). The management of conversational topic by a ten year old child with pragmatic difficulties. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 14(5), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200050051092

Raymond, G. (2004). Prompting action: The stand-alone ‘so’ in ordinary conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 37(2), 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_4

Rendle-Short, J. (2007). ‘Catherine, you’re wasting your time’: Address terms within the Australian political interview. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(9), 1503–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.006

Reynolds, E. & Fitzgerald, R. (2015). Challenging normativity re-appraising category bound, tied and predicated features. In R. Fitzgerald & W. Housley (eds), Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis (pp. 99–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473917873.n5

Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786745

Sinclair, J. (2013). Why I dislike ‘person first’ Language. Autonomy, The Critical Journal Of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies, 1(2). Retrieved from www.larry-arnold.net/Autonomy/index.php/autonomy/article/view/22

Sirota, K. G. (2006). Habits of the hearth: Children’s bedtime routines as relational work. Text & Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 26(4–5), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.020

Solomon, O. (2004). Narrative introductions: Discourse competence of children with autistic spectrum disorders. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604041770

Solomon, O. (2008). Language, autism, and childhood: An ethnographic perspective. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 28, 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190508080148

Sterponi, L. (2004). Construction of rules, accountability and moral identity by high-functioning children with autism. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604041768

Sterponi, L. & Shankey, J. (2014). Rethinking echolalia: Repetition as inter­actional resource in the communication of a child with autism. Journal of Child Language, 41(2), 275–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000682

Stevanovic, M. (2018). Social deontics: A nano-level approach to human power play. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(3), 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12175

Stribling, P., Rae, J. & Dickerson, P. (2009). Using conversation analysis to explore the recurrence of a topic in the talk of a boy with an autism spectrum disorder. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23(8), 555–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200802491165

Wilkinson, R. (2019). Atypical interaction: Conversation analysis and com­municative impairments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631045

Wingard, L. (2006). Parents’ inquiries about homework: The first mention. Text & Talk, 26(4–5), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.023

Published

2021-02-16

How to Cite

Henderson, G. . (2021). Deontics at bedtime: A case study of participants’ resources in a directive trajectory involving a mother and her autistic child. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 4(2), 168–191. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.12412

Issue

Section

Articles