The strategic use of engagement resources in engineering written reports
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.22082Keywords:
professional writing, engineering, systemic functional linguistics: APPRAISAL, ENGAGEMENTAbstract
Written engineering discourse is embedded in its social context and is sensitive to the relationship between an engineer and their client. In order for engineering writers to be able to frame their evidence as part of a convincing argument, they require a strong understanding of the client’s needs and the regulatory context. To present this understanding and framing in writing, the grammatical resources covered by the ENGAGEMENT framework (Martin and White, 2005) are crucial. Engagement resources offer the tools with which to position the voice of the writer in relation to the reader and other voices. This paper presents the findings of a study of the use of engagement resources in a corpus of professional engineering texts which are being used in a larger project investigating the persuasive discourse of engineering. The results indicate that engineering writers strategically manipulate the contraction and expansion of the discourse space in accordance with the purpose of the text, the nature of the evidence and their particular persuasive stance. This manipulation either opens or closes the amount of room afforded to the reader to disagree with the propositions presented. Engagement meanings are also graded to increase likelihood of success and downplay negative perceptions. Finally, engagement resources are selected in such a way to present an impression of objectivity in the writing style. These findings have implications for the teaching of writing to engineering students.
References
Adelaide Brighton Cement (ABC). (2015) Alternative fuel post-trial report: Increasing plastic content to 20% in RCD wood waste at Birkenhead plant. Adelaide: Adelaide Brighton Cement Ltd.
Douglas Partners. (2017) Report on preliminary geotechnical investigation. Canberra: Douglas Partners.
Derewianka, B. (2007) Using appraisal theory to track interpersonal development in adolescent academic writing. In A. McCabe, M. O’Donnell, and R. Whittaker (eds.) Advances in language and education 142–165. London: Bloomsbury.
Energy Safe Victoria (ESV). (2018) 2018 Australia Day weekend outages: Technical investigation report. Melbourne: Energy Safe Victoria.
Engineers Australia. (2019) Stage 1 competency standard for professional engineers. Australia: Engineers Australia.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bazerman, C. (1988) Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press.
Beer, D., & McMurrey, D. (2005) A guide to writing as an engineer, 2nd edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Carmichael, S., Wu, K.-Y., & Lee, J. (2012) Designing and evaluating a genre-based technical communication course incorporating a task-based model of instruction. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics 14(2): 20–44.
Coffin, C. (2002) The voices of history: Theorising the interpersonal semantics of historical discourses. Text 22(4): 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.020
Collins, J. (2010, July) Engineers learn to write: coaching the art of noticing with writing samples. IEEE International Professional Comunication Conference, Enschede, Netherlands.
Conrad, S. (2017) The use of passives and impersonal style in civil engineering writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 32(1): 38–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917729864
Dannels, D. P. (2000) Learning to be professional: technical classroom discourse, practice, and professional identity construction. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 14(1): 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/105065190001400101
Ding, D. (2001) Object-centered-How engineering writing embodies objects: a study of four engineering documents. Technical Communication 48(3): 297–308.
Fakhruddin, W. F. W. W., & Attan, A. (2013) Putting knowledge gained into practice in civil engineering lab reports. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 70: 1501–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.218
Gardner, S., & Xu, X. (2019) Engineering registers in the 21st century: SFL perspectives on online publications. Language, Context and Text 1(1): 65–101. https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00004.gar
Goldsmith, R., Willey, K., & Boud, D. (2019) Investigating invisible writing practices in the engineering curriculum using practice architectures. European Journal of Engineering Education 44(1–2): 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1405241
Gwiasda, K. E. (1984) Of classrooms and contexts: teaching engineers to write wrong. IEEE Transactions on Education 27(3): 148–150. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.1984.4321688
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004) An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
Hertel, J. D., Cunningham, C. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2017) The roles of engineering notebooks in shaping elementary engineering student discourse and practice. International Journal of Science Education 39(9): 1194–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1317864
Hood, S. (2010) Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Humphrey, S. (2006) ‘Getting the reader on side’: Exploring adolescent online political discourse. E-Learning and Digital Media 3(2): 143–157. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2006.3.2.143
Humphrey, S. (2013) Empowering adolescents for activist literacies. Journal of Language and Literacy Education [Online] 9(1): 114–135.
Kmiec, D., & Longo, B. (2008) The IEEE guide to writing in the engineering and technical fields. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Leydens, J. A. (2012) Sociotechnical communication in engineering: an exploration and unveiling of common myths. Engineering studies 4(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2012.662851
Liu, F., & Hood, S. (2019) Rhetorical strategies of political persuasion: the play of irrealis and realis meaning in re/aligning readers in newspaper editorials. Text & Talk 39(5): 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2041
McMurtrie Consulting Engineers. (2018) Traffic impact assessment report: Melbrig cattle feedlot expansion 340 Derra Road, Mundubbera, Queensland. North Rockhampton: McMurtrie Consulting Engineers.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005) The language of evaluation: Appraisal in english. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Milke, M. W., Paul, M. J., & Koorey, G. F. (2015) Transferability of practitioner-focused civil engineering capstone design courses: an analysis for a US and New Zealand approach (technical paper). Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 20(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7158/D13-008.2015.20.1
Myskow, G. (2017) Surveying the historical landscape: The evaluative voice of history textbooks. Functional Linguistics 4(7): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-017-0039-3
O’Donnell, M. (2007) UAM Corpus Tool. Madrid: Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.
O’Brien, W. T. (2000) The acceptability of writing by second language engineering students: acculturating to a profession [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Concordia University].
Poltavtchenko, E. (2013) Engineering design reports in upper-division undergraduate engineering courses and in the workplace [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University].
Rio Tinto Alcan. (2011) Environmental impact statement for South of Embley Project. Gladstone: Rio Tinto Alcan.
Rothwell, E. J., & Cloud, M. J. (2014) Engineering writing by design: creating formal documents of lasting value. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Rus, D. (2015) Developing technical writing skills to engineering students. Procedia Technology 19: 1109–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2015.02.158
Sales, H. (2006) Professional communication in engineering. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith, S. (2003) The role of technical expertise in engineering and writing teachers’ evaluations of students’ writing. Written Communication 20(1): 37–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303253570
Simpson-Smith, C. (2021a) Persuasion in engineering reports: Evaluative resources and targets in practice. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics 12(2): 6–21. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2021.17006
Simpson-Smith, C. (2021b, December) Writing objectively: Functional grammar as a tool to improve engineering students’ writing style [Conference presentation]. Research in Engineering Education Symposium & Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Perth, Australia.
Spencer Gulf Ports Link. (2013) Port Bonython bulk commodities export facility: Draft environmental impact statement. Adelaide: Spencer Gulf Ports Link.
van Emden, J. (2005) Writing for engineers, 3rd edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
White, P. R. R. (2020) The putative reader in mass media persuasion-stance, argumentation and ideology. Discourse & Communication 14(4): 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320910512
Winsor, D. A. (1998) Rhetorical practices in technical work. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 12(3): 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651998012003004
Winsor, D. A. (2006) Using writing to structure agency: An examination of engineers’ practice. Technical Communication Quarterly 15(4): 41–430. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1504_1
