Ecolinguistics and ecosophy

For a harmonious relationship between people and place through the intermediate medium of language


  • Zhang Ruijie University of Science and Technology Beijing
  • He Wei Beijing Foreign Studies University



ecolinguistics, ecosophy, classical chinese philosophy, sense of place


This article presents a philosophical framework for studies of ecolinguistics, combining the Eastern wisdom of ecological harmony and the Western human geographical concept of sense of place. To establish the basic criteria for ecolinguistic analysis, the article traces the three most influential Chinese schools of philosophy and extracts three of their shared disciplines: benevolence, frugality and intimacy with nature. To reveal the dynamic relationship between human beings and the places where they reside, the article revisits the concept of sense of place and extends it to cover an ecological dimension of people and place. Connecting ecological ethics derived from classical Chinese philosophy with systemic human-place dynamics, this proposed framework provides an ideological basis for ecolinguistic research, especially for discourse analysis. Following this ecosophy, the involved human beings and other elements of places included in a discourse can be revealed through the system of sense of place; and the ecological implications of linguistic features can be evaluated according to the three major principles. To complete the analysis, positive and negative orientations will be distinguished as well as a middle ground of ambivalent orientation. To conclude, this article aims to provide a well-grounded ideological reference for the deconstruction and subsequent assessment of linguistic resources, and thereby to establish a crucial strand of ecolinguistic scholarship.

Author Biographies

Zhang Ruijie, University of Science and Technology Beijing

Zhang Ruijie is Lecturer of the School of Foreign Studies at University of Science and Technology, Beijing (USTB). She is also a member of the Association Committee of China Association of Ecolinguistics. Her research interests include Systemic Functional Linguistics and ecolinguistics.

He Wei, Beijing Foreign Studies University

He Wei is Professor of Linguistics and Deputy Director of the National Research Centre of Foreign Language Education at Beijing Foreign Studies University. Her areas of expertise include Systemic Functional Linguistics, ecolinguistics, translation studies, and discourse analysis. She is particularly interested in exploring the interface between semantics and syntax from a functional point of view and in applying systemic functional linguisticsto ecolinguistic studies.


Aristotle (1952). Physics. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye (translates) The Works of Aristotle, 257–355. Chicago, IL: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

Armstrong, S. and Botzler, R. (2003). Environmental Ethics: Divergence and Convergence. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Education.

Baldrian, F. (1987). Taoism: An overview. In M. Eliade (Ed.) The Encyclopedia of Religion, 288–306. New York: Macmillan.

Barnhill, D. L. and Gottlieb, R. S. (2001). Deep Ecology and World Religions: New Essays on Sacred Grounds. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Berardi, F. (2012). The Uprising: On Poetry and Finance. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).

Bonnes, M. and Secchiaroli, G. (1995). Environmental Psychology: A Psycho-social Introduction. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI:

Brandenburg, A. M. and Carroll, M. S. (1995). Your place or mine? The effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society & Natural Resources 8(5): 381–398. DOI:

Brown, G. and Raymond, C. (2007). The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Applied Geography 27(2): 89–111. DOI:

Buttimer, A. (1976). Grasping the dynamism of lifeworld. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 66(2): 277–292. DOI:

Canter, D. (1991). Understanding, assessing and acting in places: is an integrative framework possible? In T. Garling and G. Evans (Eds) Environmental Cognition and Action: An Integrated Approach, 191–210. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI:

Chawla, L. (1992). Childhood place attachments. In I. Altman and S. M. Low (Eds) Place Attachment, 63–86. New York: Springer. DOI:

Chawla, S. (1991). Linguistic and philosophical roots of our environmental crisis. Environmental Ethics 13(3): 253–262. DOI:

Chen, H. B. (2008). Review of ecosophy in Buddhism. Mt Wutai Researches 2: 60–64.

Chen, H. B. (2012). Studies of the ecological principles of Buddhism. Studies in World Religions 2: 33–41.

Cheng, H. and Cheng, Y. (2004). Anthology of Two-Cheng. Shanghai: Zhonghua Book Co. Ltd.

Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: Conceptual and operational definition. In S. Clayton and S. Opotow (Eds) Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, 45–65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI:

Cuba, L. and Hummon, D. M. (1993). A place to call home: Identification with dwelling, community, and region. The Sociological Quarterly 34(1): 111–131. DOI:

Cui, W. K. (1998). Reflections on genesis of Buddhism and its practical value for ecological environment. Mt Wutai Researches 3: 3–6.

do Couto, H. H. (2014). Ecological approaches in linguistics: A historical overview. Language Sciences 41(Part A): 122–128. DOI:

Duyvendak, J. J. K. (1954). Tao Te Ching: The Book of the Way and Its Virtue. London: John Murray.

Eckel, M. D. (1998). Is there a Buddhist philosophy of nature? In R. S. Cohen and A. I. Tauber (Eds) Philosophies of Nature: The Human Dimension, 53–69. Netherlands: Springer. DOI:

Eisenhauer, B. W., Krannich, R. S., and Blahna, D. J. (2000). Attachments to special places on public lands: An analysis of activities, reasons for attachments, and community connections. Society and Natural Resources (13): 421–441. DOI:

Evernden, L. L. N. (1985). The Natural Alien: Humankind and Environment. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Fang, L. T. (2002). Philosophical Essence of Buddhism (Part A). Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

Fill, A. and Penz, H. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. London: Routledge. DOI:

Fill, A. and Mu?hlha?usler, P. (2001). Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Fried, M. (1963). Grieving for a lost home. In L. J. Duhl (Ed.) The Urban Condition: People and Policy in the Metropolis, 124–152. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Fung, Y. L. (1997). A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. New York: The Free Press.

Gans, H. J. (1962). The Urban Villagers; Group and Class in the Life of Italian-Americans. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

Gardner, D. K. (2003). Zhu Xi’s Readings of the Analects. Canon, Commentary and the Classical Tradition. New York: Columbia University Press.

Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 463–496. DOI:

Goatly, A. (1996). Green grammar and grammatical metaphor, or language and the myth of power, or metaphors we die by. Journal of Pragmatics 25(4): 537–560. DOI:

Greenblatt, K. Y. (1975). Chu-hung and Lay Buddhism in the Late Ming. In W. T. D. Bary (Ed.) The Unfolding of Neo-Confucianism, 93–140. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI:

Gustafson, P. (2001). Meanings of place: everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(1): 5–16. DOI:

Gustafson, P. (2006). Place attachment and mobility. In N. McIntyre, D. R. Williams, and K. E. McHugh (Eds) Multiple Dwelling and Tourism: Negotiating Place, Home and Identit, 7–31. Wallingford: CABI. DOI:

Halliday, M. A. K. (1990). New ways of meaning: A challenge to applied linguistics. Journal of Applied Linguistics (Ninth World Congress of Applied Linguistics Special Issue) (6): 7–36. Reprinted in Halliday, M. A. K. (2003) On Language and Linguistics. Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, 384–417. London and New York: Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge. DOI:

Harvey, P. (1990). An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Haugen, E. (1972). The Ecology of Language. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

He, W., Zhang, R. J., Zhang, F., Dan, X. H. and Wei, R. (2017). Functional Semantic Analysis of Chinese. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Hidalgo, M. C. and Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(3): 273–281. DOI:

Huang, G. W. (2016). Rising and development of ecolinguistics. Foreign Languages in China 1: 1+9–12.

Jackson, J. B. (1994). A Sense of Place, a Sense of Time. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. DOI:

Jenkins, T. N. (2002). Chinese traditional thought and practice: Lessons for an ecological economics worldview. Ecological Economics 40(1): 39–52. DOI:

Ji, X. L. (1996). New understandings of unity of Heaven and human. China Qigong Science 1: 14–15.

Jorgensen, B. and Stedman, R. (2001). Sense of Place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners’ attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 233–248. DOI:

Kang, Z. Q. (1995). On unity in unity of Heaven and human. The Journal of Humanities 4: 49–85.

Korpela, K. M., Ylén, M., Tyrväinen, L., and Silvennoinen, H. (2009). Stability of self-reported favorite places and place attachment over a 10-month period. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(1): 95–100. DOI:

Kortenkamp, K. and Moore, C. (2001). Ecocentrism. and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(3): 261–272. DOI:

Lechevrel, N. (2009). The intertwined histories of ecolinguistics and ecological approaches of language(s): Historical and theoretical aspects of a research paradigm. From Symposium on Ecolinguistics: The Ecology of Science, 2009, Odense, Denmark. Retrieved on 15 June 2018 from

Lechevrel, N. (2011). Les Approches Ecologiques en Linguistique: Approches Critique. Paris: Academia Bruylant.

Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac: With Essays on Conservation from Round River. New York: Ballantine Books.

LeVasseur, T. (2015). Defining ‘Ecolinguistics?’: Challenging emic issues in an evolving environmental discipline. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 5(1): 21–28. DOI:

Li, T. C. (2003). Confucian ethics and the environment. Culture Mandala: The Bulletin of the Centre for East-West Cultural and Economic Studies 6(1): 1–6.

Liang, Q. C. (2003). History of Political Thoughts in Pre-Qin Period. Tianjin: Tianjin Ancient Books Publishing House.

Liu, Z. H. (1996). Unity of Heaven and human and powerism. Tianjin Social Sciences 4: 83–86.

Low, S. M. (1992). Symbolic ties that bind. In I. Altman and S. M. Low (Eds) Place Attachment, 165–185. New York: Plenum Press. DOI:

Low, S. M. and Altman I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman, S. M. Low (Eds) Place Attachment 1–12. New York: Plenum Press. DOI:

Ma, X. C. (2006). Buddhist concept of Pure Land and the cultural and ecological outlook of the ancient Chinese writers. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities 1: 141–147.

Manzo, L. C. (2003). Beyond house and haven: toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 47–61. DOI:

Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology (25): 67–86. DOI:

Masterson, V., Stedman, R., Enqvist, J., Tengö, M., Giusti, M., Wahl, D., and Svedin, U. (2017). The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: A review and research agenda. Ecology and Society 22(1): 49–53. DOI:

Mazumdar, S. and Mazumdar, S. (2004). Religion and place attachment: A study of sacred places. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(3): 385–397. DOI:

McAndrew, F. T. (1998). The measurement of ‘Rootedness’ and the prediction of attachment to hometowns in college students. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18(4): 409–417. DOI:

Meng, P. Y. (2004). Human and Nature: Chinese Ecosophies. Beijing: Chinese People’s Publishing House.

Mesch, G. S. and Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and Behavior 30(4): 504–519. DOI:

Michelson, W. M. (1976). Man and His Urban Environment: A Sociological Approach, with Revisions. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Moore, R. L. and Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users. Leisure Sciences 16(1): 17–31. DOI:

Mühlhäusler, P. and Mühlhäusler, P. (2003). Language of Environment: Environment of Language: A Course in Ecolinguistics. London: Battlebridge Publications.

Murdy, W. H. (1975). Anthropocentrism: A modern version. Science 187(4182): 1168–1172. DOI:

Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry 16: 95–100. DOI:

Naess, A. (1984). A defense of the deep ecology movement. Environmental Ethics 6(3): 265–270. DOI:

Naess, A. (1995). The shallow and the long range, deep ecology movement. In A. Drengson and Y. Inoue (Eds) The Deep Ecology Movement: An Introductory Anthology, 3–10. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.

Nash, J., and Mühlhäusler, P. (2014). Linking language and the environment: The case of Norfolk and Norfolk Island. Language Sciences 41(Part A): 26–33. DOI:

Needham, J. (1956). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 2, History of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., and Brown, B. (2010). Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1(1): 97–110. DOI:

Norton, B. G. (1984). Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics 6(2): 131–148. DOI:

Piveteau, J. L. (1969). Le sentiment d’appartence regional en Suisse. Revue Geographie Alpine 59: 364–386. DOI:

Relph, E. C. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.

Relph, E. C. (1981). Rational Landscapes and Humanistic Geography. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Relph, E. (1993). Modernity and the reclamation of place. In D. Seamon (Ed.) Dwelling, Seeing, and Designing: Toward a Phenomenological Ecology, 25–40. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Ren, J. Y. (1996). Discussion of unity between Heaven and human. Traditional Culture and Modernization 1: 5–8.

Riemer, J. W. (2004). Job relocation, sources of stress, and sense of home. Community, Work & Family 2: 205–217. DOI:

Rolston, H. III (1988). Environmental Ethics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Sack, P. R. D. (1997). Homo Geographicus: Framework for Action, Awareness and Moral Concern. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Scannell, L. and Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(1): 1–10. DOI:

Schafer, D. P. (1998). Culture: Beacon of the Future. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Schultz, B. (1992). Language and the Natural Environment. In A. Fill and P Mühlhäusler (Eds) Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment, 109–114. London: Continuum.

Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum 22(3): 347–358. DOI:

Shamai, S. and Ilatov, Z. (2004). Measuring sense of place: Methodological aspects. Tijdschriftvoor Economische en Sociale Geografie 96(5): 467–476. DOI:

Shamai, S. and Kellerman, A. (1985). Conceptual and experimental aspects of regional awareness: An Israeli case study. Tijdschriftvoor Economische en Sociale Geografie 76(2): 88–99. DOI:

Snyder, G. (1990). The Practice of the Wild. New York: North Point Press.

Song, Z. M. (1998). On unity between Heaven and human. Study & Exploration 4: 54–59.

Steele, F. (1981). The Sense of Place. Boston, MA: CBI Publishing Company.

Steffensen, S. V. (2007). Language, ecology and society: An introduction to Dialectical Linguistics. In J. C. Bang, J. Døør, S. V. Steffensen, and J. Nash (Eds) Language, Ecology and Society: A Dialectical Approach, 3–31. London: Heinemann.

Steffensen, S. V. and Fill, A. (2014). Ecolinguistics: the state of the art and future horizons. Language Sciences 41(PA): 6–25. DOI:

Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. New York: Routledge. DOI:

Taylor, P. (1986). Respect for Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Taylor, R. L. (1998). Companionship with the world: Roots and branches of a Confucian ecology. In M. E. Tucker and J. Berthrong (Eds) Confucianism and Ecology: The Interrelation of Heaven, Earth and Humans, 37–58. Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of World Religions.

Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. New York: Columbia University Press.

Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Tucker, M. E. (1994). Ecological themes in Taoism and Confucianism. In M. E. Tucker and J. Grim (Eds) Worldviews and Ecology: Religion, Philosophy, and the Environment, 150–160. Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis Books.

Twigger-Ross, D. and Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16: 205–220. DOI:

Uzzell, D., Pol, E. and Badenas, D. (2002). Place identification, social cohesion, and environmental sustainability. Environment and Behavior 34: 26–53. DOI:

Virden, R. J. and Walker, G. J. (1999). Ethnic/racial and gender variations among meanings given to, and preferences for, the natural environment. Leisure Sciences 21: 219–239. DOI:

Wang, M. (1985). Evolution of the forms of materialism in pre-Qin and Han Dynasty. Philosophical Researches 5: 50–56.

Wei, D. D. (1999). The ecosophy in Buddhism. Social Sciences in China 5: 105–117+206.

Weston, A. (1991). Non-anthropocentrism in a thoroughly anthropocentrized world. Trumpeter 8(3): 108–112.

Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., and Watson, A. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences 14: 29–46. DOI:

Xiao, Y. (1998). On the value of benevolence and its practical value in ecological environment. Mt Wutai Researches 2: 7–10.

Yu, M. C. (2006). Philosophical ideas in Buddhism-imbued environment. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition) 2: 25–32.

Zhang, D. N. (1985). Studies of the unity of Heaven and human in Chinese philosophy. Journal of Peking University 1: 3–10.

Zhang, H. C. and Ren, J. H. (2003). On the Eco-ethics of Chinese Buddhism. Journal of Jishou University (Social Science) 3: 44–49.

Zhou, W. J. (2017). Ecolinguistics: Towards a new harmony. Language Sciences 62 (Supplement C): 124–138. DOI:

Zhou, W. J. and Huang, G. W. (2017). Chinese ecological discourse: a Confucian-Daoist inquiry. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 12 (3): 264–281. DOI:

Zimmerman, M. E. (1993). Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.



How to Cite

Ruijie, Z., & Wei, H. (2021). Ecolinguistics and ecosophy: For a harmonious relationship between people and place through the intermediate medium of language. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 14(3), 261–297.